The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Winlist 3d 8

Manufactured by Verity Software House
Sourced in United States

WinList 3D 8.0 is a software package that provides advanced data analysis and visualization capabilities for flow cytometry. The software enables users to view and interact with flow cytometry data in a three-dimensional (3D) environment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using winlist 3d 8

1

Annexin V-FITC and Propidium Iodide Apoptosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following incubation with drugs, 5 × 105 cells were spun down and resuspended in 0.5mL HEPES solution (10mM HEPES, 150mM NaCl, 1mM MgCl2, 5mM KCl, 1.8mM CaCl2). Cells were incubated with 5μl FITC annexin V (Life Technologies) for 10 minutes at room temperature followed by addition of 10μl of a 50μg/ml solution of propidium iodide (Life Technologies). Flow cytometry was performed using a BD LSR II Flower Cytometer at the Flow and Image Cytometry Core facility at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Data was analyzed using WinList 3D 8.0 software (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDS-L cells (7.5 × 105 cells/ml) were exposed to WFA (10 μM) or DMSO for 8 h. Cells treated with FCCP (50 μM) for 2 h were used as a positive control. JC-1 was added at a 1 μM final concentration to cells for the last 30 min of treatment at 37°C and fluorescence was measured by the iCyt Synergy sorter system (Sony Biotechnology Inc., San Jose, CA) with 488 and 561 nm lasers. WinList 3d 8.0 software (Verity Software House Inc., Topsham, Maine) was used for data analyses. For microscopy, cells treated with WFA (10 μM) or DMSO and stained with JC-1 as described above were mounted on poly-l Lysine (MilliporeSigma-Aldrich # P-6282) coated slides by Cytospin. Pictures were taken on the same day with a Nikon A1RSi confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc, Melville, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Enumeration via Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial cell counts were measured by flow cytometry using an Influx (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) with a 200 mW 488 nm laser. Thawed samples were stained with SYBR Green I (0.5X final concentration; Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark [33 (link)]. 0.75 μm yellow-green and 0.5 μm green polystyrene beads (Polysciences, Inc., Warrington, PA, USA) were added as a standard. Samples were run for 2 min at 25 μl min-1 after a 2 min pre-run, and the inline measurement was confirmed by weighing the sample before and after the run. Bacterial populations were resolved by green fluorescence (520/35 nm bandpass filter, also serving as the data collection trigger) and Forward Angle Light Scatter (FALS). Cyanobacteria were analyzed in unstained samples based on FALS (trigger) versus chlorophyll autofluorescence (692/40 nm bandpass) and phycoerythrin autofluorescence (572/27 nm bandpass, Synechococcus only). Prochlorococcus abundances from unstained samples were subtracted from bacterial abundances derived from stained samples to enumerate non-photosynthetic bacteria. Flow cytometry data were analyzed in WinList 3D 8.0 (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric measurements were analysed using WinList 3D 8.0 (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA). All graphical analyses were created using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Single experimental values were calculated from raw data as described in the sections above. Sets of single values were analysed for outliers using the respective functionality in GraphPad Prism (settings: ROUT method, Q = 0.1%). Identified outliers were excluded from further analysis. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare two groups. Welch correction was employed in case of differing standard deviations (SD) between groups. For comparison of more than two groups, one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s Test for post hoc analysis were used. Relative marker expression or concentration values were compared to a normalised control by one-sample t test. Nomenclature for significance was applied according to New England Journal of Medicine standards. All calculations were computed with the statistics tools provided by GraphPad Prism, version 8.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!