The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using cd206 clone c068c2

1

Isolation and Characterization of Mouse Skin-Derived Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse skin was incubated with 0.25% (w/v) trypsin-EDTA (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 60 minutes at 37°C to separate the dermis from the epidermis. These tissues were then incubated with 400 units/mL collagenase type II (Worthington) with shaking for 30 minutes at 37°C. After adding 10 mM EDTA, the resulting cell suspensions were passed through a 70 μm cell strainer (Corning), and RBCs were then lysed for 2 minutes on iced with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) containing 0.84% (w/v) ammonium chloride. The cells were preincubated with purified rat anti–mouse CD16/CD32 (mouse BD Fc Block, clone 2.4G2, BD Biosciences) and then stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies specific for mouse F4/80 (clone BM8), CD11c (clone N418), and CD206 (clone C068C2), purchased from BioLegend. Flow cytometry was performed on a EC800 Cell Analyser flow cytometer (Sony Biotechnology) and analyzed using FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Macrophage Phenotyping and DsRed Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For macrophage analysis, CD45.1 (Ly-5.1) and CD45.2 (Ly-5.2; Tonbo Bioscience), CD11b (clone M170; BioLegend), F4/80 (clone CIA31; Serotec), Mertk (R&D Systems), CD64 (clone X54-5/7.1; BioLegend), CD11c (N418; BioLegend), and MHCII (clone M5/114.15.2; BioLegend) antibodies were used. For validation experiments, CD206 (clone C068C2; BioLegend), CD163 (clone M96; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and Tim4 (clone RMT4-54; BioLegend) antibodies were used. Cells were stained with the indicated antibodies for 15 min at 4°C and were analyzed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) on an LSR Fortessa flow cytometer equipped with DIVA software (BD). FlowJo software was used to analyze data. To measure the degradation of the DsRed fluorescence signal within macrophages, extracted tissues were processed (as explained above) and kept at 37°C or 4°C (control) during flow cytometric analysis of macrophages every hour for a total of 6 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of transplanted tumors were obtained by digestion with 1 mg/ml Collagenase I (Sigma) and 1 mg/ml Dispase II (Roche) in RPMI containing 5 % FBS for 45 min at 37°C under shaking condition. The cell suspension was passed through a 70 μm nylon mesh and centrifuged. After red blood cell lysis, Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse FcR antibody (clone 93, Biolegend) for 15 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. Then, cells were stained with anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, Biolegend), CD11b (clone M1/70, Biolegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, Biolegend), F4/80 (clone BM8, Biolegend), PDGFRα (clone APA5; Biolegend), CD206 (clone C068C2, Biolegend), CD11c (clone N418, Biolegend) and MHC II (I-A/I-E, clone M5/114.15.2, Biolegend) antibodies for 30 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. For analysis of Treg cells in the tumor, cells were stained with anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, Biolegend, 1:100), Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 1:50) antibodies using a Foxp3 staining buffer kit following the instructions (eBioscience). Samples were acquired on a Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Single-cell Analysis of Macrophage Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A single‐cell suspension was derived from the BALF of LysMCre:Shp2fl/fl and Shp2fl/fl mice 24 hour after secondary S aureus infection. After blocking the Fc receptor, cells were stained with CD11b (clone M1/70, BioLegend, San Diego), F4/80 (clone BM8, BioLegend) and Dectin‐1 (clone RH1, BioLegend), or their corresponding IgG isotype controls. After extracellular markers were stained, the cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained with CD206 (clone C068C2, BioLegend) or its isotype control. Cell samples were detected by CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.), and FlowJo software (TreeStar, Inc.) was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Dissociation and Staining of Murine Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After in vivo experiments, mouse tumors were rapidly excised and mechanically dissociated in PBS using scissors. The tumors were then digested in serum-free RPMI supplemented with 20 mg/ml DNase I (Roche), 20 mg/ml Dispase II (Roche) and 20 mg/ml collagenase I (Sigma) for 30–60 min at 37 °C with rotation to promote dissociation. The resulting single-cell suspensions were passed through 70 μM strainers twice, and red blood cells in the tumor samples were lysed with red blood cell lysis buffer (eBioscience, #00-4333-57) for 5 min at room temperature. Then, the single-cell suspensions were washed in Cell Staining Buffer (BioLegend) and incubated with the indicated flow antibodies at 4 °C for 30 min. Prior to staining with antibody panels, cells were blocked with a monoclonal antibody against CD16/32 (BioLegend) for 15 min at 4 °C. All the antibodies and reagents used for flow cytometry included ZombieRED (ECD, Biolegend, #423110), CD45 (clone 30-F11, Biolegend, #103116), CD3e (clone 145-2C11, Biolegend, #100328), CD4 (clone RM4-5, Biolegend, #100536), CD8 (clone 53–6.7, Biolegend, #100706), GZMB (clone QA16A02, Biolegend, #372208), PRF1 (clone S16009B, Biolegend, #154404), F4/80 (clone BM8, Biolegend, #123127), CD11b (clone M1/70, Biolegend, #101206), CD86 (clone GL-1, Biolegend, #105006) and CD206 (clone C068C2, Biolegend, #141719).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identification and Quantification of Muscle Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions from muscle were prepared by collagenase II (Worthington Biochemical Corp, Lakewood, NJ, USA) digestion followed by staining with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies.
Antibodies used: (1) Gr1 Clone RB6-8C5 (eBioscience, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat#48-5931-82); (2) F4/80 Clone BM8 (Invitrogen, Cat# 11-4801-82); (3) CD11b Clone M1/70 (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat#17-0112-81); (4) Siglec-F Clone E50-2440 (RUO), (BD BioSciences, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA, Cat# 552126); (5) CD206 Clone C068C2 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA, Cat#141701) and live dead stain (eBioscience). Data acquisition was performed on a FACS Aria or Fortessa (BD Biosciences). UltraComp eBeads (Cat#01333342, Invitrogen) were used to generate single-stain controls. Data was analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10.2) and gating strategies as previously described [39 (link)] to discriminate against dead cells, debris, and doublets were utilized. M1 macrophages were defined as Gr1low-med, F4/80+, and CD11b+.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Single-Cell Tumor Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were processed into single-cell suspensions by mincing, as well as chemical (Murine Tumor Dissociation Kit, Miltenyi Biotec) and mechanical (gentleMACS Dissociator) dissociation, per manufacturer recommendations. Suspensions were filtered through a 100 μm filter and washed with 1% BSA in PBS prior to blocking nonspecific staining with anti-CD16/32 (BioLegend) antibody. Cell surface staining was performed using fluorophore-conjugated anti–mouse CD45.2 (clone 104), CD3 (clone 145-2C11), CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD8 (clone 53-6.7), CD31 (clone 390), PDGFR (clone APA5), PD-L1 (clone 10F.9G2), H2-Kb (clone AF6-88.5), CD107a (clone 1D4B), PD-1 (clone RMP1-30), CD11b (clone M1/70), Ly6G (clone 1A8), Ly6C (clone HK1.4), CTLA-4 (clone 9H10), CD39 (clone Duha59), CD11c (clone N418), F4/80 (clone BM8), and CD206 (clone C068C2) from BioLegend, and IL-12Rb2 (clone 305719) from R&D Systems. FoxP3+ Treg staining performed with the mouse Treg Staining Kit #1 (eBioscience) as per manufacturer’s protocol. Cell viability was assessed via staining with Sytox (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or Zombie (BioLegend) dyes. All analyses were performed on a BD Fortessa analyzer running FACSDiva software and interpreted using FlowJo V.X10.0.7r2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!