The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

54 protocols using freeze dryer

1

Purification of Bioemulsifier by Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crude bioemulsifier sample was subjected to further purification using a gel filtration chromatography column packed with Sephadex G-75 (Acros Organics, Germany). The column was washed and eluted with 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at a flow rate of 5 mL/min. The collected fractions were measured at an absorbance of 280 nm using UV‒Vis spectrophotometer (Jenway 6305, UK), and the total protein content, total carbohydrates, and total emulsification activity (EI24) were determined. Fractions with higher emulsification activity were pooled and lyophilized in a freeze dryer (CHRIST, Germany) and stored for further characterization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation and Characterization of Pp-EE Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 95% ethanol extract of Pp-EE was prepared with the arial part of P. paradoxa Nutt., as reported previously [38 (link)]. The arial part of P. paradoxa Nutt., purchased from Herbmaul (Seoul, Korea), was ground to a powder, which was then used for the extraction process. The extraction was performed with 127 g of the plant material and 890 mL of 95% ethanol for 2 h, three times. The extract was percolated through filter paper (3 mm; Whatman PLC, Kent, UK), condensed using a rotary evaporator (Büchi AG, Flawil, Switzerland), and lyophilized using a freeze dryer (Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen, Osterode am Harz, Germany). Pp-EE powder was dissolved and used as a 100 mg/mL stock solution using DMSO as a solvent. The experiment was performed while using DMSO as vehicle control, with the same dilution level as the negative control. For the in vitro experiment, Pp-EE stock solution was dissolved in a culture medium. When making dilutions to treat cells, the dilution coefficient was considered so that the final concentration could be the target concentration we wanted. For the in vivo experiment, the powder was suspended in 0.5% sodium carboxymethylcellulose (0.5% CMC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Radiolabeled Steroids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed as previously described (36). Briefly, cells were seeded and incubated in 24-well plate for ∼24 h and then treated with the indicated drugs and [3H]-labeled steroids (∼1,000,000 cpm/well; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) at 37 °C. Aliquots of medium were collected and treated with β-glucuronidase (Novoprotein Scientific Inc, China) at 37 °C for 2h, extracted with ethyl acetate: isooctane (1:1), and dried in a freeze dryer (Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen, Germany). Dried samples were reconstituted in 100 μL of 50% methanol and injected into the HPLC. Metabolites were separated on CORTECS C18 reverse-phase column (Waters, Ireland), using a methanol/water gradient at 40 °C. The column effluent was analyzed using β-RAM model 3 in-line radioactivity detector (LABLOGIC, USA). Results showed the mean and standard deviation (sd) value from one representative experiment. All HPLC studies were run in duplicate and repeated at least three times in independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimized Extraction of C. formosum Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Cultivated young leaves of C. formosum were collected from a local field in Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand. The plant was identified by comparison to the voucher specimen BCY No. 022 deposited in the herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ubon Ratchathani University. The leaves were dried at 50°C and sifted through a 40-mesh screen sieve. Extraction of the plant powder was performed using a heat-reflux method (38.83% ethanol in water, 59.76°C, 5.50 h) according to the optimized extraction conditions previously reported by the authors.3 (link)
Ethanol was removed under vacuum, and the resulting CFE in aqueous solution was dried in a freeze dryer (Martin Christ GmbH, Osterode, Germany) before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Formulation of Fenofibrate Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An exactly weighed quantity of 100 mg of FLZ was dissolved in 3 mL of dichloromethane. Thereafter, by using a syringe, the drug was dropped into distilled water (20 mL) containing the stabilizer (0.5, 1, 5 w/v %) under magnetic stirrer at 1000 rpm for 4 h until the solvent was completely evaporated, thereby resulting in supersaturation of the FLZ in solution and nanoparticle formation. The prepared FLZ nanosuspensions were frozen at −30 C and finally dried with a freeze-dryer (Martin Christ, Osterode, Germany) at −40 C (Ibrahim et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Methanol Extract of Pterospermum elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol extract of P. elegans stem was supplied by Foreign Plant Extract Bank (no. FBM118-023; Daejeon, Korea). The plant was collected by Sydara K (one of the authors of the paper) in Ham Ao, Laos in 2010 and authenticated by Institute of Traditional Medicine (ITM). A voucher specimen recoded as ‘Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) 0033580ʹ was deposited in the herbarium of the Korea KRIBB. Briefly, the dried and refined aerial parts of P. elegans (92g) were extracted with 1,000 mL of 99.9% (v/v) methanol using a sonicator (SDN-900H, SD Ultrasonic Cleaner, Seoul, Korea) at 45°C for 3 days (15 min sonication at 1500 W and 40 kHz followed by 2 h standing; repeated 10 times per day). The resultant product was filtered with non-fluorescent cotton, condensed using a rotary evaporator (N-1000SWD, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan) under reduced pressure at 45°C, and lyophilized using a freeze dryer (Christ, Germany). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a solvent for lyophilized substances.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lyophilization of Eu-Doped NLC for Storage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lyophilization of NLC-Eu ensures long term storage of the samples as it enhances the chemical and physical stability of the nanoparticles. Lyophilized NLC-Eu permits the incorporation of these nanoparticles into more stable form, such as capsules and tablets. Lyophilized NLC-Eu was prepared using a freeze dryer (Martin Christ GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). Briefly, 5 mL of NLC-Eu nano-emulsion was poured into a plastic petri dish and frozen at − 80 °C (Thermoforma, Marlotta, USA) for a few hours. The plates were then covered using parafilm, which had several holes poked through it, and subsequently, freeze-dried for 24 h at − 55 °C [26 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ethanol Extraction of Soy Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scheme for the aqueous ethanol washing process is provided in Figure 1. Aqueous ethanol solutions were prepared in advance by mixing water with 96% ethanol in a Schott glass bottle with the correct volume. The ethanol to the total solvent volume ratio is referred to, in this study, as water/ethanol ratios of 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100%.
DFSM was mixed with aqueous ethanol solution in a solid/liquid ratio of 1:10 (w/v) and stirred at room temperature (25 °C) for 30 min. Then, the dispersion was centrifuged (20,000× g, 30 min, 25 °C) to separate the supernatant and pellet. The supernatant was collected as the extract, and the pellet was transferred to a fume hood overnight to evaporate the ethanol. Subsequently, the pellet was freeze-dried (Freeze Dryer, Martin Christ, Osterode, Germany) and milled into powder, which is reported in this study as dried soy protein concentrates (SPCs). All the extracts and SPCs processed with varied water/ethanol ratios were prepared in triplicate and stored at 4 °C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing Alginate Micro-structures Using Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize the TEP derived from the precursors (e.g. various alginate blocks), a bright-field microscope (Keyence, Japan) was employed. The fresh sample solutions were prepared prior to observation as described above. In order to visualize TEP with the bright-field microscope, precursor solutions were stained by freshly pre-filtered (0.05 μm polycarbonate filter) alcian blue solution as presented above. Stained samples were then observed under the microscope. For each sample, about 20 images were randomly taken.
The micro-structures of TEP derived from MG-, MM- and GG-blocks at different Na+/Ca2+ ratios were also observed by a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Jeol JSM-7600F, Japan). Although TEP were freeze dried prior to microscopic observation, this microscopic technique could still provide direct visualizations of evidence of TEP micro-structures. 10–50 mL of sample solutions prepared as described above were filtered through 0.1 μm polycarbonate filters (Whatman, United Kingdom) at a constant pressure of 0.2 bars and was then rinsed by 1 mL of Milli-Q water. Filters with retained alginate blocks were completely freeze-dried completely in a freeze dryer (Christ, Germany) for further examination. All samples were observed at least three times and 8–10 images were randomly recorded each time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bioactive Glass-Gelatin Scaffold Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
58sBG with a composition of TEOS (6.6 ml), TEP (0.86 ml) and Ca(NO3)2 4H2O (4.25 g) was prepared by an evaporation–induced self–assembly (EISA) method as previously reported (Tsigkou et al., 2014 (link)). The ink was first prepared before printing. A total of 1.05 g 58sBG, 1.5 g Gel and 0.6 g of SA were added to 10 ml of deionized water at 55°C in a constant temperature system. Then, magnetic and mechanical stirring were used to mix the materials. The obtained ink was transferred to the barrel of a 3D bioprinter (Regenovo, Hangzhou, China). The experimental parameters of the printing process were set as follows: the needle diameter was 0.4 mm, the extrusion pressure was 0.38 MPa, the printing speed was 15 mm/s, the adjacent filaments were 1.2 mm, and the extrusion temperature was 28°C. According to the needs, two different shapes of scaffolds were printed (10 mm × 10 mm × 1.5 mm cubic scaffold for in vitro study, 5 mm diameter and 1.5 mm high cylindrical scaffold for in vivo study). Next, the obtained scaffolds were soaked in 10% CaCl2 solution and cross–linked for 10 min. Further cross–linking in 0.25% glutaraldehyde solution for 30 min was carried out. After that, scaffolds were washed with distilled water 5 times and soaked in distilled water for 8 h. Finally, scaffolds were frozen at 80°C and dried for 24 h in a freeze dryer (CHRIST, Germany) for further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!