The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using cytobank software

1

High-Dimensional Analysis of Leukocyte Phosphoproteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total leukocytes (CD45+CD41 cells; fig. S8A) were analyzed using Cytobank software and equal cell numbers were sampled for unsupervised, high-dimensional visualization t-Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (viSNE) analysis (33 (link)). Thirteen parameter viSNE maps were generated from antibodies against the following cell surface markers: CD8, CD4, CD20, CD11c, CD11b, CD123, CD13, CD56, CD33, CD15, CD3, CD14, and HLA-DR. For Spanning-tree Progression Analysis of Density-normalized Events (SPADE) analysis (55 (link)), mononuclear cells (CD45+CD41CD15 cells; fig. S8A) were analyzed with Cytobank software (Cytobank, Inc.). The down-sampled events were then clustered based on phenotypically similar cells by the expression of CD4, CD8, CD3, CD14, CD16, CD56, CD20, CD123, CD33, CD13, HLADR, CD11c, and CD11b. Because the largest single-cell increases in the abundances of intracellular phosphoproteins occurred at 15 min compared to initial experiments performed at 1 and 5 min after incubation with each SPM (fig. S7), 15-min incubations were thus used throughout. To determine the fold-difference in the abundances of phosphoproteins of interest, vehicle controls were used as reference points and compared to samples incubated with SPMs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CyTOF Analysis of PBMC Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human PBMC were immunostained with rare earth metal-tagged monoclonal antibodies. Available pre-conjugated antibodies were purchased from Fluidigm (San Francisco, CA) and others were conjugated to metal isotopes using the Maxpar antibody conjugation kit (Fluidigm) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were stained as previously described (6 ) and analyzed on a CyTOF 2 mass cytometer (Fluidigm) at an event rate of approximately 500 cells/second. To normalize CyTOF data over different days, EQ Four Element Calibration Beads (Fluidigm) were added in all samples. Data were analyzed with Cytobank software (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN). To remove debris and doublets, single cells were gated based on cell length and DNA content as described by Bendall et al. (25 (link)). High dimensional single-cell data produced by mass cytometry were interpreted using the Cytobank viSNE package, allowing visualization of high-dimensional cytometry data on a 2-dimensional map at single-cell resolution preserving the nonlinearity (26 ). The antibodies used for mass cytometry studies are included in Table S1 and tSNE plots for each marker are included in Figure S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CyTOF Data Normalization and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using the workflow previously developed (23 (link)). Briefly, after acquisition, intrafile signal drift was normalized and.fcs files were obtained using CyTOF software. To diminish batch effects, all files were normalized on EQ Beads (Fluidigm) using the premessa R package (https://github.com/ParkerICI/premessa). Raw median intensity values were transformed to a hyperbolic arcsine (arcsinh) and then analysis was performed using Cytobank software (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Platelet Isolation from Whole Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After acquisition, samples were cleaned up according to the latest standard of data pre-gating (Fluidigm) using the Cytobank™ software (www.cytobank.org, Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA)28 . To avoid leukocyte contamination, we gated the acquired events for platelet-specific markers: only CD41 (GPIIb)- and CD61-(GPIIIa) positive events were selected for further analysis and defined as platelets (Supplemental Fig. I). CD3 marker was included in the panel as an additional negative control (Supplemental Fig. II).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-Specific T-Cell Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Upon stimulation with the SARS-CoV-2 PepTivator, PBMCs were stained using fluorophore-conjugated antibodies. A master mix containing all the antibodies was prepared directly prior to staining. At first, the cells were stained using live/dead marker Viobility 405/452 dye (Miltenyi Biotech) for 10 min at RT in the dark. Following fixation and permeabilization, the cells were stained using fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (Table S2) for 10 min at RT in the dark. All samples were washed thoroughly with PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (AMERESCO, USA) and 2 mM EDTA. Data were acquired using the Cytoflex 5L cytometer (Beckman Coulter) followed by analysis using Cytobank software (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Live CD14, CD20, CD3+, CD4, and CD8 T-cells specific to SARS-CoV-2 S protein were defined based on the double expression of two activation markers exhibiting the highest expression levels of CD40L+ TNFα+ CD4 T-cells and CD40L+ IFNγ+ CD8 T-cells. The percentage of S-specific peptide CD4 for each patient was calculated as the percentage of CD40L+ TNFα+ CD4 in the S peptide-stimulated sample minus the percentage of CD40L+ TNFα+ CD4 in the DMSO control sample. The same calculation was performed for S-specific peptide CD8 and for each marker (CD40L, TNFα, and IFNγ) separately.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Dimensional Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
viSNE, FlowSOM, and CITRUS analyses were performed using Cytobank software (Beckman Coulter). For viSNE analysis, equal number of cells (1,000 cells) from each flow cytometry standard (FCS) file were used, and resulting viSNE maps were fed into FlowSOM analysis.75 (link) For each cell subset, a new self-organizing map was generated using hierarchical consensus clustering on the tSNE axes. For CITRUS analysis, association models of significance analysis of microarrays and nearest shrunken centroid were selected as statistical methods. Abundance mode was selected to quantify and characterize individual clusters in samples. The minimal cluster size was 3%, and the cross-validation fold was 5.45 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw data were analysed in a blinded way. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann‐Whitney non‐parametric U‐test combined with Bonferroni correction, and the Kruskal‐Wallis non‐parametric test with the post hoc Dunns’ test using GraphPad Prism software, RRID:SCR_002798. The data are shown as means and significance threshold was placed at P < 0.05. Survival analyses (Cox regression, Kaplan‐Meier), correlations, heat maps and PCA were performed using the survival, GGally, gplots, ggplot2 (RRID:SCR_014601), ggbiplot, MissMDA and FactoMineR (RRID:SCR_014602) packages of the R i386 software version 3.6.2. Data clustering and global visualisation was performed using Cytobank software (Beckman) and the available analysis algorithms (viSNE, FlowSOM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Dimensional Phenotyping of Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were dissociated using the Miltenyi mouse tumor dissociation kit, and CD45+ cells were enriched using Percoll differential centrifugation. Live cells were stained using Cell-ID cisplatin, and Fc receptors were blocked with TruStain FcX (1:100) prior to extracellular staining using the University of North Carolina mass cytometry core antibody panel. Cells were fixed and permeabilized for intracellular staining of FoxP3 using the eBioscience FoxP3 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, US) staining buffer set. Finally, cells were intercalated with iridium overnight. Live CD45+ single cells were gated using Cytobank software (version 9.0, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and then analyzed in R as previously described [33 (link)]. Briefly, following hyperbolic inverse sine transformation, a self-organizing map was built, and consensus clustering was performed. Over-clustered clusters were collapsed manually and visualized by tSNE plots. The differential abundance of each cell type and the differential expression of each marker with each cell type was determined by a generalized linear mixed logistic model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Expanded Allo-reactive B Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Allo-stimulator B cells were obtained from previous study where transplant donor primary B cells were expanded using CD40L-transfected fibroblasts and IL-4 according to previously published protocol18 (link),42 (link). Wildtype and HLA-E+ K562 cell lines were provided by Deepta Bhattacharya. All stimulator cells were profiled for activating and inhibitory ligands by staining with a viability dye and surface antibodies (Supplementary Table 8) in FACS buffer (DPBS, 2% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM EDTA) for 30 minutes on ice; cells were stained in triplicate with isotype controls. After washing, cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (EMS, cat #15710) for 10 minutes at room temperature, resuspended in FACS buffer, and stored at 4°C until acquisition on LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences). Results were analyzed on Cytobank software (Beckman Coulter) and R software version 4.0.3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

CyTOF Data Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was undertaken using Cytobank software (https://www.beckman.jp/flow‐cytometry/software/cytobank‐premium), Prism 8 (GraphPad), and R statistical software (http://www.r‐project.org) within the CATALYST (Cytometry dATA anALYSis Tools) pipeline, referring to the CyTOF workflow (version 4).27, 28, 29 To test the statistical significance of differences between two groups, a two‐tailed paired Student’s test was applied in Prism 8. Using the CyTOF workflow, differential abundance analysis was assessed using a linear mixed model to calculate adjusted P values.28
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!