The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dylight 550

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

DyLight 550 is a fluorescent dye developed by Thermo Fisher Scientific. It is designed for labeling proteins, nucleic acids, and other biomolecules for imaging and detection applications. The dye has an excitation maximum at 562 nm and an emission maximum at 576 nm, making it suitable for use with common fluorescent imaging equipment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

44 protocols using dylight 550

1

Fluorescent DNA Synthesis and Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All DNA below 90 bp were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies, and DNA of greater length was synthesized by PCR. FAM-labelled DNA was also purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. DyLight-550 and DyLight-650 maleimides were purchased from Thermo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunocytochemistry of Stem Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunocytochemistry was as previously described (Weick et al., 2013 (link)). Briefly, coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for fifteen minutes, rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and permeabilized using 0.2% Triton for five minutes. Cells were blocked with 10% donkey serum in PBS for 30 minutes, followed by an overnight incubation of primary antibody in 5% donkey serum at 4°C. Primary antibodies consisted of monocloncal Oct4 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), polyclonal Pax6 (1:500, developmental studies hybridoma bank), monoclonal βIII-Tubulin (1:2000, Sigma), and polyclonal GABA (1:100, Sigma). Cells were then washed with 1x PBS and incubated for one hour at 4°C with secondary antibody in 5% donkey serum. Secondary antibodies (anti-mouse DyLight 488 and anti-rabbit DyLight 550 (1:500; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were washed with 1x PBS and then treated with DAPI at 1:10,000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by three washes with 1x PBS, and mounted on glass cover slides using Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry Analysis of YAP and Calpain-6

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunocytochemistry was performed after cell fixation with 4% PFA in PBS and saturation of the non-specific sites with BSA and donkey serum. The cells were permeabilized by adding Igepal or Triton X-100 in the saturation solution. For immunohistochemistry we collected paraffin-embedded specimens of resected pulmonary metastatic tissue from 3 patients with well-characterized osteosarcoma. Informed consent was obtained from each patient or the patient’s guardian. Sections from these tissues or 143B cells were used to analyze YAP and calpain-6 expression. Saturation of non-specific Ig binding sites involved using PBS containing 0.02% Triton-X100, 1% donkey serum, 1% BSA. Secondary antibodies consisted of DyLight-550 or -480-conjugated anti- IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nuclei were then counterstained with DAPI at 0.1 µg/ml. To reduce autofluorescence in tissue sections, we used the TRUEVIEW quenching kit (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). The primary antibodies are listed in supplemental Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of Endothelial Cells and Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells or frozen sections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h, blocked with 5% BSA containing 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h, and incubated with primary antibody against CD144 (1: 500, Abcam, catalogue number: ab205336) at 4 °C overnight followed by washing 3 times with PBS and incubation with anti-rabbit IgG (H + L), F (ab ‘) 2 Fragment (Alexa Fluor® 488 Conjugate) (1: 500, CST, catalogue number: 4412S) for 2 h. After washing in PBS three times, DIPA (1 mg / ml) was added for 10 min incubation followed by washing twice with PBS, mounting on an anti-tissue fluorescence quencher and observation under a microscope.
Mice femurs were isolated and keeped in 4% PFA for 2 h at 4 °C. After decalcification and dehydration, the femurs were embedded with 8% gelatin 20% sucrose 2% PVP and kept at − 80 °C. Femurs were sliced into 20–30 μm thickness. Non-specific binding were blocked with 4%BSA in PBS at room temperature for 1 h. The desired primary antibody diluted in PBS with 1%BSA were covered the sections at 4 °C overnight. For bone marrow endothelial staining, we used Mouse Endomucin Antibody (RD, AF4666). Rat anti-CD150 (Biolegends, 115,902), Rat anti-CD48 (Biolegends, 103,432), Rat anti-lineage-biotin (Biolegends), DyLight® 550 (ThermoFisher, SA5–10027) and Streptavidin-Brilliant Violet 421™ (Biolegends, 405,225) were used for HSC staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Permeability Assay for Thrombin-Induced Disruption of TIME Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect disruption of confluent TIME cell monolayers on MCs, we used the 45 kDa collagen-binding of fibronectin (FNc) purified from human plasma (Sigma-Aldrich) conjugated to DyLight 550 with a labeling kit (ThermoFisher Scientific). The cells were grown to confluence either on gelatin-coated round 12-mm glass coverslips (GG-12-Gelatin, Neuvitro), or in spinner flasks spun at 35 rpm at 37 °C and 5 percent CO2. On the day of the permeability assay, the cells were treated with thrombin for 30 min at 2 U/mL and with 1 μg/mL FNcf for 5 min. The cells were washed with ice cold PBS, fixed in 4 percent paraformaldehyde/PBS for 30 min (coverslips) or in 50 percent EtOH/PBS and 1 percent FBS for 10 min at 23 °C (MCs), and washed again with PBS. The coverslips were mounted on glass slides with Prolong Gold (Invitrogen), a DAPI-containing medium. Permeability was quantified by measuring dye (DyLight 550, Ex/Em 562⁄576 nm, ThermoFisher Scientific) fluorescence amplitude per MC in epifluorescence images at 20X magnification (EVOS FL, ThermoFisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Rejuvenating Aged Plasma Therapy in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following pull-down of sVCAM1, pooled, depleted aged human plasma (IgG versus sVCAM1 depleted) or saline (200 µl/mouse) was injected retro-orbitally (r.o.) into young (4-month-old) NSG mice (n=7–8 mice/group) twice daily for 4 days for 7 total injections. Mice were also injected with BrdU (100 mg/kg, i.p.) starting on the third day. Mice were anesthetized with avertin followed by saline perfusion on the 4th day of treatment, 4 hours after the 3rd BrdU and 7th plasma injections. One mouse per group received intra-orbital injections of 100 µg fluorescently labeled (DyLight™488, Thermo Scientific, 53025) InVivoMAb anti-mouse CD106 (VCAM-1, clone M/K-2.7, Bioxell, BE0027) and fluorescently labeled (DyLight™550, Thermo Scientific, 84530) rat anti-mouse MECA-99 (gift of the Butcher lab) 3 hours prior to perfusion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunostaining Protocol for Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was performed using procedures similar to those described previously (Minc, et al., 2011 (link); Foe and von Dassow, 2008 (link)). Embryos were fixed for 70 min in 100 mM Hepes, pH 6.9, 50 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgSO4, 2% formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde, 0.2% Triton X-100, and 800 mM glucose. To limit autofluorescence, samples were rinsed in PBS and placed in 0.1% NaBH4 in PBS made fresh 30 min before use. Samples were then rinsed in PBS and PBT (PBS plus 0.1% Triton X-100) and incubated for 24–48 h in rabbit anti-KDEL (Invitrogen) at 1:1000 and mouse anti-tubulin (DM1A; Sigma-Aldrich) at 1:5000 primary antibodies in PBT. After three washes of 1 h in PBT, samples were incubated for 12 h in goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondary antibodies coupled with Dylight 488 and Dylight 550 (ThermoFisher Scientific) at 1:1000 in PBT. Samples were then washed three times for 1 h in PBT, incubated 15 min in PBS containing 10 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 to label DNA, transferred into 50% glycerol PBS, and finally transferred into mounting medium (90% glycerol and 0.5% N-propyl gallate PBS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunostaining of Microtubules in Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was performed by using procedures similar to those described previously (Foe and von Dassow, 2008 (link); Minc et al., 2011 (link)). Embryos were fixed in the same glass-bottom dish, after filming centration or decentration, for 70 min in 100 mM Hepes, pH 6.9, 50 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgSO4, 2% formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde, 0.2% Triton X-100, and 800 mM glucose. To limit autofluorescence, samples were rinsed in PBS and placed in 0.1% NaBH4 in PBS made fresh 30 min before use. Samples were then rinsed in PBS and PBT (PBS 0.1% Triton X-100) and incubated for 24 to 48 h in mouse anti-tubulin (DM1A; Sigma-Aldrich) primary antibody at 1:5,000 in PBT. After three washes of 1 h in PBT, samples were incubated for 12 h in goat anti-mouse secondary antibody coupled with Dylight 550 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 1:1,000 in PBT. Samples were then washed three times for 1 h in PBT, transferred in 50% glycerol PBS, and finally transferred into mounting medium (90% glycerol and 0.5% N-propyl gallate PBS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fluorescent Labeling of Replication Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type ORC and Cdc6 were purified as described previously (Frigola et al., 2013 (link)). We used a N- and C-terminal protein modifications to fluorescently label ORC (-LPETGG at the C-terminus of Orc5 and Orc6, Ubiquitin-GGG-Flag at the N-terminus of Orc1), Mcm2-7 (LPETGG at the C-terminus of Mcm2, Ubiquitin-GGG-Flag at the N-terminus of Mcm4, 3xFlag-TEV[ENLYFQ/G]-GG at the N-terminus of Mcm3), and Cdt1 (Ubiquitin-GGG tag at the N-terminus, LPETGG tag at the C-terminus). The ubiquitin (in vivo) and 3xFlag-TEV (using TEV protease, NEB) fusions were removed to reveal three N-terminal glycines required for N-terminal sortase-mediated labeling. The peptides NH2-CHHHHHHHHHLPETGG-COOH and NH2-GGGHHHHHHHHHHC-COOH were used for N- and C-terminal labeling, respectively, and will be referred to as the N-peptide and C-peptide. The N- and C-peptides were labeled with maleimide-derivatized DY549P1 (Dyomics), DY649P1 (Dyomics), Dylight550 (Thermo-scientific), Dylight650 (Thermo-scientific), or Cy3B (Cytiva) via cystine–maleimide conjugation as described previously (Ticau et al., 2015 (link)). Sortase was used to couple the fluorescently labeled peptide to the N- or C-terminus of the helicase-loading proteins as described below. The peptide-coupled proteins were separated from uncoupled proteins using Ni-NTA Agarose (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptional Profiling of S. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. pneumoniae D39 (wild-type) and MT3 (ΔparB::spc) cells with an OD600 of 0.2 were diluted 100-fold in 28 ml C+Y medium (pH 7.0) and grown without aeration to an OD600 of 0.2. Cells were collected by centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. RNA was isolated using the macaloïd method and the High Pure RNA isolation kit (Roche), as previously described (44 (link)). RNA concentration and quality were determined using NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific) and capillary electrophoresis with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technology). cDNA synthesis and labeling with either DyLight550 or DyLight650 (Thermo Scientific) were performed as described in reference  11 (link). For microarray methods and data analysis, procedures described in reference  44 (link) were used. Genes were considered significantly affected when the absolute change was greater than 2-fold, with a P value cutoff of 0.005.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!