The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti digoxigenin fitc

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States, Germany

Anti-digoxigenin-FITC is a fluorescently labeled antibody that recognizes the digoxigenin molecule. It is commonly used in various molecular biology techniques, such as in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting, to detect and visualize target molecules that have been labeled with digoxigenin.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using anti digoxigenin fitc

1

In situ hybridization of H. chilense genomic DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total H. chilense genomic DNA was also labelled by nick-translation with biotin-11-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Germany) or digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and used as a probe. The in situ hybridisation protocol was performed according to Prieto et al. (2004b (link)). The amount of either the biotin- or digoxigenin-labelled probes in the hybridisation mixture was 5 ng. Unlabelled wheat genomic DNA was used as blocking DNA at a ratio of 1:50 (probe/blocking DNA). Biotin-labelled H. chilense DNA and digoxigenin-labelled H. chilense DNA were detected with a streptavidin-Cy3 conjugate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and antidigoxigenin-FITC (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France), respectively. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Hybridisation signals were visualised using a Nikon Eclipse 80i epifluorescence microscope. Images were captured with a Nikon CCD camera using the Nikon 3.0 software (Nikon Instruments Europe BV, Amstelveen, The Netherlands) and processed with Photoshop 4.0 software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromosome Preparation and Fiber-FISH Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromosome preparations, DNA fibers obtention, single and double-color FISH, and Fiber-FISH experiments were conducted as described in Kuhn et al. (2008) (link). The probes labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP were detected with antidigoxigenin FITC (Roche) and probes labeled with biotin-14-dATP were detected with NeutrAvidin-rhodamine (Roche). Chromosomes were stained with DAPI (4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride salt). The preparations were analyzed under an epifluorescence Zeiss Axiophot 2 microscope equipped with a CCD camera and the images were obtained using the AxioVision software (Zeiss). To determine the size of the DNA fibers, hybridization signals were measured according to the protocol described by Schwarzacher and Heslop-Harrison (2000) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FISH method was conducted as follows: slides with fixed chromosomes were maintained at 37 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, they were incubated with RNAse (10 mg/ml) for 1 h at 37 °C in a moist chamber. Next, it was performed a 5-min wash with 1xPBS and 0.005 % pepsin was applied to the slides (10 min at room temperature). The slides were then washed again with 1xPBS. The material was fixed with 1 % formaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min. After further washing, the slides were dehydrated with 70, 85 and 100 % ethanol, 2 min in each bath. The chromosomal DNA was denatured in 70 % formamide/2xSSC for 3 min at 72 °C. The slides were dehydrated again in a cold ethanol series (70, 85 and 100 %), 5 min each. The hybridization mixture, containing 100 ng of denatured probe, 10 mg/ml dextran sulfate, 2xSSC and 50 % formamide (final volume of 30 μl) were heated to95 °C for 10 min and then applied on the slides. Hybridization was performed for a period of 16–18 h at 37 °C in a moist chamber. After hybridization, the slides were washed for 5 min with 2xSSC and then rinsed quickly in 1xPBS. The detection of the probes was performed with Streptavidin-Cy3 (Sigma) for the 18S rDNA probe and anti-digoxigenin-FITC (Roche) for the 5S rDNA probe. The chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (1.2 g/ml) in Antifading solution (Vector Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Dual-Colour FISH Technique for DNA Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual-colour FISH experiments were performed essentially according to Sember et al. [53 (link)]. Probes were detected by Anti-Digoxigenin-FITC (Roche) and Streptavidin-Cy3 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, San Diego, CA, USA). Experiments with altered labelling (e.g., biotin for 28S and digoxigenin for 5S rDNA) were included to verify the observed patterns. All FISH images presented here have pseudocoloured signals–red for the 28S rDNA and U2 snDNA probes and green for the 5S rDNA. In uni-colour FISH, hybridization signals of U2 snDNA probes were detected using the Cy3-conjugated streptavidin (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA), followed by additional signal enhancement using biotinylated Anti-Streptavidin and second round of Streptavidin-Cy3 detection (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, USA) according to Fuková et al. [68 (link)]. Finally, all FISH slides were mounted in medium containing antifade and 1.5 μg/ml DAPI (Cambio, Cambridge, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hybridization mix containing 50% (v/v) formaldehyde, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate in 5 × SSC, and 200 ng of labeled probes was applied onto the slides and denatured for 2 min 15 s at 80°C. Hybridization was carried out overnight at 37°C in a humid chamber. After the hybridization, the stringent wash was performed in 0.1 × SSC (2 mmol/l MgCl2 and 0.1% Triton X-100) (Schwarzacher and Heslop-Harrison, 2000 ) for 10 min at 42°C according to Vláčilová et al. (2002) (link). Indirectly labeled probes were detected using antidigoxigenin-FITC (Roche Applied Science) and Streptavidin-Cy3 (ThermoFisher Scientific/Invitrogen, Waltham, United States). The preparations were counterstained with DAPI and mounted in Vectashield antifade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). Images of metaphase plates were acquired with Axio Imager Z.2 Zeiss microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with Cool Cube 1 camera (Metasystems) and appropriate optical filters. The captured images were processed with ISIS software (Metasystems). Karyotypes were constructed after the analysis of at least twenty complete metaphase plates and their images were created using Adobe Photoshop CS5 (version 12.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Metaphase Chromosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitotic metaphase chromosome spreads were prepared according to Doleželová et al. (1998 (link)). Probes for 45S rDNA and 5S rDNA were prepared by labeling Radka1 (45S rDNA) and Radka2 (5S rDNA) DNA clones (Valárik et al., 2002 (link)) with digoxigenin-11-dUTP or biotin-16-dUTP (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) using PCR with M13 forward and reverse primers (Invitrogen). Probes for tandem repeats CL18 and CL33 were amplified using specific primers (Hřibová et al., 2010 (link)) and labeled as the rDNA probes using PCR. Hybridization mixture consisting of 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate in 1×SSC, and 1 μg/ml of each labeled probe was added onto slides and denatured at 80°C for 3 min. The hybridization was carried out at 37°C overnight. The sites of probe hybridization were detected using anti-digoxigenin-FITC (Roche Applied Science) and streptavidin-Cy3 (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, USA), and the chromosomes were counterstained with diamidino-2-phenylindole. The slides were examined with Axio Imager Z.2 Zeiss microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with Cool Cube 1 camera (Metasystems, Altlussheim, Germany) and appropriate optical filters. The capture of fluorescence signals and layers merging were performed with ISIS software (Metasystems); the final image adjustment was done in Adobe Photoshop 12.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing rDNA Loci in Allium and Festulolium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cytogenetic experiments chromosomes were prepared using the SteamDrop method (Kirov et al. 2014 ). To visualise 5S and 45S rDNA in Alliumfistulosum Linnaeus 1753, the plasmids pSct7 (Lawrence and Appels 1986 (link)) and pTa71 (Gerlach and Bedbrook 1979 (link)) were used. FISH was performed as described in Kirov et al. (2016) . Biotin and digoxigenin labeled probes were detected by Streptavidin-Cy3 (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and anti-digoxigenin-FITC (Roche, Germany), respectively.
GISH on × Festulolium Ascherson & Graebner, 1902 hybrids was performed as described in Van Laere et al (2010) . Loliumperenne Linnaeus, 1753 was used as probe DNA, labelled with Digoxigenin, while Festucapratensis Hudson, 1762 was used as block DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chromosome FISH Probe Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hybridization mix (30 µl) containing 50% (v/v) formamide, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate in 2x SSC and 10 ng/µl of labeled probe was added onto slide and denatured for 3 min at 80°C. Hybridization was carried out overnight at 37°C. The sites of hybridization of digoxigenin- and biotin-labeled probes were detected using anti-digoxigenin-FITC (Roche Applied Science) and streptavidin-Cy3 (ThermoFisher Scientific/Invitrogen), respectively. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI and mounted in VECTASHIELD Antifade Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The slides were examined with Axio Imager Z.2 Zeiss microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with Cool Cube 1 camera (Metasystems, Altlussheim, Germany) and appropriate optical filters. The capture of fluorescence signals, merging the layers, and measurement of chromosome length were performed with ISIS software 5.4.7 (Metasystems), the final image adjustment and creation of idiograms were done in Adobe Photoshop CS5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Situ Hybridization of Telomeres and Centromeres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed anthers were squashed in 45% acetic acid in water for in situ hybridisation. The telomeric sequence was amplified by PCR using the (5′-TTTAGGG-3′) and (5′- CCCTAAA-3′) primers in the absence of template DNA [42] and a cereal centromeric sequence (CCS1) was amplified using the conditions described by [43] (link). The in situ hybridisation protocol was performed according to [44] (link). Digoxigenin-labelled centromeres and biotin-labelled telomeres were detected with antidigoxigenin-FITC (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and streptavidin- Cy3 conjugates (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), respectively. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and mounted in Vectashield. Hybridisation signals were visualised using a Nikon eclipse 80i epifluorescence microscope. Images were captured with a Nikon CCD camera using the Nikon 3.0 software (Nikon Instruments Europe BV, Amstelveen, The Netherlands) and processed with Photoshop 4.0 software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescence Microscopy Chromosome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparations were transferred from 2 × SSC to 0.1% (v/v) Tween (Sigma Aldrich) in 4 × SSC (4 × SSC/Tween) and kept there at RT for several minutes. After a quick draining of the slides on a paper towel, 100 μl of anti-digoxigenin-FITC (Roche Applied Science) diluted 1:70 in 4 × SSC/Tween +3% (w/v) BSA (Bovine Serum Albumine; Sigma-Aldrich) was mounted on a slide, covered with a plastic coverslip and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in the humid plastic box. Then the preparations were washed three times in 4 × SSC/Tween (7 min each wash) at 37 °C (water bath), drained and mounted in Vectashield antifade medium (Vector Laboratories) supplemented with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Sigma-Aldrich) at 1 μg/μl final concentration. The preparations were analyzed under 100× oil immersion objective of the Nikon NiU epifluorescent microscope and images were captured with a cooled monochrome DSQi1 camera (Nikon) to the computer using NIS Elements software (Laboratory Imaging, Ltd.) and uniformly processed in Adobe Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Systems). Additionally, to confirm the assignment of a correct number to a given chromosome pair (within the metaphase plate), chromosome measurements were carried out on some digitally captured metaphases using the public domain Fiji software package (https://fiji.sc/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!