The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Kasp genotyping assay

Manufactured by LGC
Sourced in United Kingdom, Germany

The KASP genotyping assay is a DNA-based technology developed by LGC for genetic analysis. It provides a reliable and efficient method for the detection and identification of specific genetic variants within a sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

34 protocols using kasp genotyping assay

1

Genotyping of rs1021737 SNP in CTH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rs1021737 (S403I) SNP in CTH was selected based on previous published evidence of functional consequences to CTH function [57 (link),80 (link)]. Genotyping of rs1021737 was performed using KASP genotyping assays (LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK) in an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Mean call rate for the SNPs was >98%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Variants Associated with Atrial Fibrillation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methods for DNA extraction and also the SNP genotyping and analysis of this study have been described previously in detail [20 (link)]. In brief, we used whole blood and isolated the total genomic DNA using LGC’s Kleargene™ silica-based DNA extraction technique, which was performed at LGC Genomics. Isolated DNA was then analyzed using UV spectrophotometry to estimate both the quality and quantity of the DNA and normalized.
Based upon the results of previous genetic association studies, 24 common genetic variants known to be associate with AF [9 (link)–12 (link), 14 (link), 16 (link), 17 (link), 21 (link)–27 (link)] were selected for SNP genotyping in both the cases and controls. SNP genotyping was performed using KASP™ genotyping assays from LGC genomics (http://www.lgcgenomics.com). For each SNP two allele specific forward primers and one reverse primer were designed (LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK) as described in detail previously [20 (link)]. All assays were conducted without any knowledge of case or control status. Genotypes for all SNPs passed our quality-control threshold (call-rate ≥ 94%; Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P > 0.05 in control subjects).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

TaqMan and KASP SNP Genotyping Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems) or KASP genotyping assays (LGC Genomics) were used for the analysis of the SNPs. Case and control samples were amplified simultaneously in 384 well format (Hydrocycler 16 (LGC Genomics), using 3 ng whole genome amplified DNA from blood). Endpoint genotype detection was carried out on the ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Call rates for 40 out of 41 SNPs were 94–99%. Internal quality controls showed a concordance rate of ≥ 99%. Samples with < 50% call rate over all assays were excluded from the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genotyping of TREM2 and PLD3 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from whole blood samples as described previously (Engelman, et al., 2013 (link)). Genotyping of the TREM2 variant R47H (rs75932628) and PLD3 variants V232M (rs145999145) and A442A (rs4819; splice site variant) was performed using competitive allele-specific PCR based KASP genotyping assays (LGC Genomics, Beverly, MA). The quality control process has been described previously (Darst, et al., 2016 (link)). The PLD3 splice site variant, A442A, was monomorphic in our sample. Consequently, no genetic association analysis could be performed on this variant. The other PLD3 variant and the TREM2 variant were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

APOE Genotyping by Competitive Allele-Specific PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

APOE genotyping was performed by competitive allele-specific PCR, using KASP™ genotyping assays (LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK) for both rs7412 and rs429358. Subsequent genotype data was converted into APOE allele status [70 (link)]. Full methods for the KASP™ genotyping platform are available from LGC Genomics (http://www.lgcgenomics.com/genotyping/kasp-genotyping-reagents/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Analysis of Complement Activation in AMD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Venous blood was obtained for genetic analysis and the measurement of the complement components C3 and C3d. Complement component C3 and the activation fragment C3d were measured in serum samples as described previously.[29 (link)] The C3d/C3 ratio was calculated as a measure of complement activation. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using standard procedures. Genotyping of nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to be associated with AMD, in the ARMS2 (rs10490924), CFH (rs1061170, rs800292, and rs12144939), C3 (rs2230199 and rs1047286), CFB (rs4151667 and rs641153), and CFI (rs10033900) genes was performed in at least 85% of the included subjects with KASP™ genotyping assays (LGC Genomics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genotype frequencies in the control individuals were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Variant Validation via Genotyping and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variant-specific KASP genotyping assays (LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK) and/or direct automated (Sanger) sequencing were used to validate all the variants in the candidate genes. Sequencing was performed at STAB VIDA (Caparica, Portugal) and Macrogen (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and data was analysed with SeqMan Pro (Lasergene 13, DNASTAR, Madison, WI). The primers used for amplification and sequencing were the same as the ones used to amplify the pooled DNAs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genomic DNA Isolation and SNP Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood (EDTA-preserved) was used for isolation of genomic DNA using the QuickGene-810 Nucleic Acid Isolation System (Fujifilm, Life Science Products, Tokyo, Japan) and quantified on a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Saveen Werner, Limhamn, Sweden).
The SNPs were analyzed using KASP SNP genotyping assays (LGC Genomics, Hoddesdon, UK), which facilitates bi-allelic discrimination through a competitive PCR and incorporation of a fluorescent resonance energy transfer quencher cassette. KASP genotyping assays were designed by LGC Genomics toward the following sequences: rs10407022, CTCCAGGCA[T/G]CCCACAAGAGC and rs11170547, GTTCTCCCTTTCAC[C/T]TACTAACACTAATTTG. A standard touch-down PCR program, as advised from the manufactures, was used to discriminate alleles. The annealing temperature was decreased by 0.6°C in 10 cycles from 61°C to 55°C for AMHR2 rs11170547 C>T and from 68°C to 62°C for AMH rs10407022 T>G.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping rs383232842 in Cattle Breeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotypes for rs383232842 were obtained in 661 Braunvieh, 3807 Fleckvieh and 503 Holstein animals using a customized KASP™ genotyping assay (LGC Genomics) (FAM/HEX/reverse primer sequence: TGTTCATGAGAACGATGCTGTTCG/CTTGTTCATGAGAACGATGCTGTTCA/TGCTTGATATTCATCAGCTTCACACAGAT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Candidate Gene Selection for Stress Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess genetic variation possibly underlying the evaluated traits, candidate genes were selected as described in Cuervo-Alarcon et al.45 (link). In brief, based on previous studies on SNP discovery in European beech63 (link)–65 (link), candidate genes that very likely participate in stress response according to the UniProt (www.uniprot.org) and the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) (www.arabidopsis.org) databases122 (link),123 (link) were selected. SNPs for genotyping in those genes were chosen based on their identification as haplotype tag SNPs by the software htSNPer 1.0124 (link) or because they already showed signs of natural selection in previous studies66 (link),68 (link). For primer design, sequences surrounding the SNPs were sent to LGC Genomics Ltd. where SNP genotyping was performed using the PCR-based KASP genotyping assay (Hoddesdon, UK). In total, 70 polymorphic SNPs in 23 candidate genes were genotyped in the saplings and represented 19 non-synonymous, 26 synonymous and 25 non-coding SNPs (Supplementary Table S12).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!