The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using loading dye

1

DNA Origami Folding Verification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel electrophoresis was used to verify the quality of the DNA origami folding (see fig. S1). Agarose gels (2%) were prepared by dissolving 2 g of agarose (Bioline, Molecular Grade) into 100 ml of 1× TAE buffer with 11 mM Mg2+ (40 mM tris, 19 mM acetic acid, 1 mM EDTA, 11 mM MgCl2). The gel was stained using 100 μl of ethidium bromide solution (0.625 mg/ml). Ten microliters of DNA origami solution were mixed with 2 μl of 6× loading dye (New England Biolabs). M13mp18 ssDNA (at 100 nM) was used as a reference at 40 nM concentration by diluting it with the folding buffer (1× TAE buffer with 12.5 mM Mg2+). The gel wells were loaded with 10 μl of the sample. The gels were run with a constant voltage of 90 V for 45 to 60 min and imaged under ultraviolet (UV) light (Bio-Rad equipment, Image Lab Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA-Nanohydroxyapatite Conjugate Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1 : 200 ratio (w : w) pDNA–R-nHA conjugates were prepared as described above, and 100 ng aliquots of the precipitates were resuspended in 20 μl of Dnase/RNase free water, respectively. DNase 1 (250 U μl−1) (Zymo Research, Tustin, CA, USA) was added (1 μl) to the resuspended pDNA–R-nHA conjugates and digestion allowed to proceed for 1 h at RT. After incubation, samples were mixed with 2 μl of 6× loading dye (New England Biolabs Ltd., Ipswich, MA, USA) and loaded onto 1% w/v agarose for electrophoresis. Samples of digested and undigested pDNA or undigested pDNA–R-nHA were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Digitonin Fractionation and DNA Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For digitonin fractionation, 107 cells were collected and washed with PBS. The cells were then resuspended in SoTE buffer (0.6M sorbitol, 2 mM EDTA and 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). Digitonin was added to a final concentration of 0.025% or 1%, and the mixture was incubated on ice for 5 min. When we treated the extractions with DNaseI, we used 2×107 cells. In addition to the 1% digitonin, we also added DNaseI to the resuspended cells and incubated them on ice for 30 min instead of 5 min. To separate the fractions, cells were centrifuged at 8000 g for 5 min at 4°C. For western blot analysis, a cell equivalent of 107 cells from both fractions (supernatant and pellet) was mixed with Laemmli buffer. For analysis of DNA content, a cell equivalent of 107 cells from both fractions (supernatant and pellet) was mixed with 6× loading dye containing SDS from NEB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification of ssDNA from Agarose Gels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Zymoclean Gel RNA Recovery Kit from Zymo Research was used to purify ssDNA from agarose gels. The gel bands containing target ssDNA were excised with a clean razor blade. Three times the gel slice volume of the provided agarose dissolving/binding buffer was added to each excised gel band and melted at 55 °C on a heat block for 15 min. Each dissolved gel solution was transferred to a provided silica-based spin column and centrifuged at 12,000 rcf for 2 min. 400 µL RNA Prep buffer was added to each spin column followed by centrifugation at 12,000 rcf for 1 min. Washing was carried out by the addition of 800 µL ethanol-based wash buffer followed by centrifugation at 12,000 rcf for 30 s. After repeating the washing step with 400 µL ethanol-based wash buffer, each spin column was centrifuged at 12,000 rcf for 2 min to remove residual ethanol. Flow-through in all steps was discarded. After transferring each spin column to clean microcentrifuge tubes, 6–20 µL of provided nuclease-free water was added directly to the column matrix, and the spin columns were centrifuged at 10,000 rcf for 1 min for retentate collection. A fraction of each purified ssDNA was mixed with 6 × loading dye (NEB) and the yield was estimated by gel electrophoresis as described above24 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive RNA Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA samples and 1 kilobases plus DNA marker were mixed with 6 × loading dye (New England BioLabs, USA), loaded onto a 1% agarose gel in Tris–acetate-EDTA buffer and run at 110 V for 50 min. RNA samples were run and analysed using the FlashGel RNA cassette system (Lonza Bioscience, USA).
Additionally, saRNA samples were prepared according to the Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit guide and run on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 using the mRNA Nano assay class protocol. The data was analysed by the 2100 Expert software (B.02.10.S1764). Fraction of intact saRNA based on the electrogram was represented by area under the curve (Supplementary information). The Lonza RNA marker (Lonza Bioscience, USA, #50,577) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Extraction and Gel Electrophoresis of Mosquito Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from each alcohol-preserved mosquito was extracted using DNAzol® reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). After PCR reactions, the amplified products were analyzed on 3% agarose gel with a low molecular weight DNA ladder (New England Biolab, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) used to estimate the band size. The electrophoresis was run for 50 min at 100 V in TBE buffer. The gel was then submerged in 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide (EtBr) (Invitrogen) solution for 15 min, de-stained for 5 min in distilled water, and visualized in a UV transilluminator.
Since EtBr is known to be a strong mutagen and is treated as hazardous waste, as alternatives we tried using Ultrapower™ (BioTeke, Beijing, China) and RedSafe™ (iNtRON Biotechnology, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) dyes, which are advertised as non-toxic and have no hazard waste. For Ultrapower™ staining, the dye solution (10,000×) was diluted 100-fold in 6× loading dye (New England Biolab), then 1 μl of diluted dye was mixed with 5 μl of PCR product. 1 μl of diluted dye was also added to 5 μl of the DNA ladder before loading on the gel. For RedSafe™ staining, 5 μl of this dye (20,000×) was mixed in with 100 ml molten agarose gel prior to gel pouring. Visualization was done immediately after gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Polyplex Integrity Validation by Gel Retardation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the integrity of Alveofact-coated polyplexes after sonication, a gel retardation assay was performed. A 1% Agarose gel was prepared and stained with ROTI®GelStain Red. Polyplexes were prepared with 300 pmol siRNA at three different Alveofact:PEI ratios (0, 2.5:1 and 5:1). As positive control, polyplexes were treated with 1 USP unit of heparin. 3 μL of low range ssRNA ladder (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) and 3 μL of siRNA were respectively diluted in 27 μL of RNA free water. 30 μL of each sample were mixed with 5 μL of loading dye (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA), loaded into the slots of a gel, and electrophoresis was run at constant voltage of 200 V for 15 min in Tris-borate EDTA buffer. The gel was visualized using a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio Rad, Hercules, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Barcoded cDNA Amplification and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Circularized cDNA was amplified and barcoded (Table S4) by adding 15 μl of PCR master mix (8 μl HF master mix (NEB), 0.8 μl 10 μM reverse barcoding primer, 0.8 μl 10 μM forward barcoding primer, 5.4 μl water) per 1 μl template (1 cycle: 30 s 98°C;; 3-to-7 cycles: 10 s 98°C; 10 s 60°C; 5 s 72°C;; 1 cycle: Hold 4°C). Tubes were taken at the end of 3-4-5-7 cycles. PCR products were mixed with 3μl loading dye (NEB) and run on 8% TBE gel (Invitrogen) (90 V, 95 min) in 1xTBE buffer. The gel was stained with SybrGold (Invitrogen) (5 min, RT) and DNA corresponding to 120-170 nt was excised. For physical disruption, the gel slices were spun through 0.5 mL tubes with holes at the bottoms nested in 1.5 mL tubes. Then 0.67 mL DNA soaking buffer (0.3 M NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) was added to the gel slurry and tubes were incubated overnight on a rotating wheel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Total RNA Quantification and Gel Electrophoresis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA concentration was determined via nanodrop and 0.5–1 µg was mixed with loading dye (New England Biolabs) and resolved via electrophoresis on a 1% agarose 1× TAE (40 mM Tris, 20 mM Acetate and 1 mM EDTA) with SYBR™ Safe DNA Stain (Invitrogen, 1:1000 dilution) gel at 150 V for 20 min then visualised on a Biorad Chemidoc Imaging system (Blue imaging tray). One kb HyperLadder (Bioline) was loaded on each gel as a reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In vitro cleavage assay of ThermoCas9

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro cleavage assays were performed with purified recombinant ThermoCas9. ThermoCas9 protein, the in vitro transcribed sgRNA and the DNA substrates (generated using PCR amplification using primers described in Supplementary Table 2) were incubated separately (unless otherwise indicated) at the stated temperature for 10 min, followed by combining the components together and incubating them at the various assay temperatures in a cleavage buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 7), 500 mM NaCl, 25 mM MgCl2, 25 (V/V%) glycerol, 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)) for 1 h. Each cleavage reaction contained 160 nM of ThermoCas9 protein, 4 nM of substrate DNA, and 150 nM of synthetized sgRNA. Reactions were stopped by adding 6X loading dye (NEB) and run on 1.5% agarose gels. Gels were stained with SYBR safe DNA stain (Life Technologies) and imaged with a Gel DocTM EZ gel imaging system (Bio-rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!