The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using miseq lane

1

Transcriptome Analysis of Diapause in Oocytes and Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from both mature oocytes and pharate larvae by homogenizing tissue in TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and performing a phenol-chloroform extraction followed by an isopropanol precipitation according to the manufacturer’s directions. Residual DNA was removed from each sample using TurboDNA Free (Ambion, Austin, Texas). RNA integrity and concentration were assessed on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Individually-barcoded sequencing libraries were prepared according to the TruSeq RNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) at the University of Maryland Institute for Genome Science. All six barcoded mature oocyte samples (3 diapause, 3 non-diapause) were pooled and run on a single Illumina MiSeq lane. All eight barcoded pharate larvae samples (4 diapause, 4 non-diapause) were pooled and then split evenly on two Illumina MiSeq lanes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mitochondrial DNA Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Private collections were sequenced using the mtFull Sequence procedure in the Gene by Gene, Ltd. lab (Houston, TX). Briefly, tissue from cheek swabs were extracted using a magnetic bead procedure. Samples were LR-PCR amplified using a KAPA HiFi Hotstart PCR kit (Roche Sequencing) with the profile: 95 °C for 5 min, [98 °C for 20 s, 65 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 3 min] × 35, 72 °C for 5 min, 4 °C hold. Amplicons were fragmented enzymatically using a QIAseq FX DNA Library kit (Qiagen), sequencing adapters were ligated, and libraries were pooled on an Illumina MiSeq lane and sequenced with 2 × 150 bp reads to 1000 × depth. We used NextGENe v2.3.1 to align raw reads and call variants. Alignment was done to the rCRS reference9 (link) with a matching requirement of ≥ 12 bases and ≥ 85%, and variant calling was done according to the manufacturer's protocols. This included a 20% threshold of original reads for heteroplasmies, which were scored with IUPAC ambiguity codes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Methylation Analysis of CpG Sites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences of each of the six CpG sites were amplified by PCR using primers containing overhangs for subsequent bar coding and library preparation (listed in Table S3). An adapted protocol of the PyroMark PCR Kit (Qiagen) was used for the PCR (50 cycles and 2 mm MgCl2). For each sample, amplicons of the six CpG sites were pooled and subsequently barcoded with 12‐bp bar codes using an adapted protocol of the NEXTflex 16S V1‐V3 Amplicon Seq Kit (Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, USA). Pooled bar‐coded samples were analyzed on a MiSeq lane (Illumina) using 250PE mode for sequencing. Methylation levels of sequenced Illumina reads were calculated by the cytosine frequency at each CpG site divided by the total number of reads. The average number of reads per sample and genomic region was approximately 25 000 and only sequences that occurred at least 10 times were further considered.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing for BHBM Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from RYO0622 and BHBM-resistant cells using a standard yeast DNA extraction protocol (60 (link)). Genomic DNA samples were quantified using Qubit fluorometry (Life Technologies) and diluted for sequencing library preparation using a Nextera XT library preparation kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA). For the initial round of sequencing, individual sequencing libraries were prepared for the parent and a single BHBM-resistant clone. These libraries were pooled and sequenced on a single MiSeq lane (Illumina), generating paired-end 150-bp reads. Further BHBM-resistant colonies were obtained in a second screen, and their DNAs were pooled at equal concentrations before preparation of a single sequencing library for the pool. This pool was sequenced alongside a new library for the parent strain on a single HiSeq 2500 lane (Illumina), generating paired-end 100-bp reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Illumina Multiplexed Sequencing of Chloroplast DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from fecal swabs was extracted using the MoBio PowerSoil‐htp 96‐well Isolation Kit (Carlsbad, CA). A portion of the chloroplast trnL intron was PCR amplified using the g (5′‐GGGCAATCCTGAGCCAA‐3′) and h (5′‐CCATTGAGTCTCTGCACCTATC‐3′) primers for the trnL gene (Taberlet et al., 2007), but modified to include appropriate barcodes and adapter sequences for Illumina multiplexed sequencing. Unique per sample 12‐bp error‐correcting barcodes were used, as described in Caporaso et al. (2012). Each PCR was mixed per the Promega PCR Master Mix specifications (Madison, WI), with 2 μl of gDNA template for a reaction volume of 25 μl. The thermocycling program used an initial step at 94°C for 2 min, a final extension at 72°C for 2 min and the following steps cycled 35 times: 2 min at 94°C, 1 min at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C.
Amplicon DNA yields from each PCR were then quantified using PicoGreen fluorometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). All PCRs were normalized to equimolar concentrations and pooled together before purification using the MoBio UltraClean PCR Clean‐Up protocol. Sequencing was performed on a single Illumina MiSeq lane with 2 × 150 cycles at the University of Colorado Next‐Generation Sequencing Facility. We sequenced single sample per individual pig. Sequence processing was performed as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soil Metabarcoding of Cyst Nematode Communities

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface-sterilized cysts were crushed in a small centrifuge tube using a pestle. DNA was isolated from the macerated cysts according to a modified CTAB protocol described in Hu et al. (2017) (link). The DNA extracted from the 50 pooled cysts collected from each plot was used to construct a single metabarcode library, with four replicates per crop sequence at each collection time point. The PCR amplification, library preparation, and sequencing were conducted at the University of Minnesota Genomic Center, Saint Paul, MN, United States (Gohl et al., 2016 (link)). The universal bacterial primers targeting the 16S rRNA V4 region with primers 515F (GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA) and 806R (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) were used. The Illumina index and flow cell adapters were amplified together with the V4 primers during the first step PCR, and dual-index barcode sequence was added at the second PCR step (Gohl et al., 2016 (link)). The samples from the same year were pooled and sequenced on one Illumina MiSeq lane with the 2 × 300 bp kit. For each paired-end lane of MiSeq, additional samples were included in order to assess the PCR and sequencing error in the downstream pipeline, including blank control samples, a mock community sample, which had equal amount of DNA isolated from pure bacterial cultures, and nine randomly chosen cyst samples for technical replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcriptome Analysis of Artemisia Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five half-sib seedlings from each A. tridentata ssp. wyomingensis (UTW1, 38.3279 N, 109.4352 W) A. tridentata ssp. tridentata (UTT2, 38.3060 N, 109.3876 W) and A. arbuscula ssp. arbuscula (CAV-1, 40.5049 N, 120.5617 W) were grown simultaneously in a petri dish on top of wetted filter paper for two days. No specific permissions were required for these locations and none of the species are endangered or protected. Seedlings were then flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground using a mortar and pestle. RNA was extracted using a Norgen RNA Purification Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Ontario, Canada). Sequencing libraries were prepared using an Illumina Tru-seq RNA Kit V2 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, California). Libraries were then pooled and multiplexed on an Illumina MiSeq lane and sequenced as 250 bp paired-end reads at the Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Microbiome Profiling from Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA and microbiome characterization from human fecal slurries, mouse cecal content, and mouse feces was extracted using a phenol:chloroform plus bead-beating protocol followed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as previously described31 (link). Briefly, feces or cecal contents were subjected to bead-beating twice for 3 minutes in a mixture containing phenol:cholraphorm:isoamyl. alcohol (UltraPure [25:24:1, v/v], ThermoFisher Scientific) and sodium dodecyl sulfate. The aqueous phase was collected, and DNA was precipitated by the addition of 1 M sodium acetate and 100% isopropanol. The DNA was then cleaned with the Neucleospin cleanup kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany) and the purified DNA was subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. 16S rRNA gene amplicon libraries were prepared using V3-V4 universal primer sets with Illumina adapters and barcodes45 (link). The resulting libraries were loaded onto a single Illumina MiSeq lane (Illumina, San Diego, CA) at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (Minneapolis, MN) which produced an average sampling depth of 36,196 ± 11,225 reads per sample. DADA246 (link) quality control and removal of chimeric reads was conducted with QIIME247 (link) (version 2022.2). Taxonomy was classified using the SILVA database48 (link) (version 132).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

16S rDNA Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from all fecal pellets and plate contents using a bead beating procedure and Qiagen PowerLyzer kit. For the human, wild chimpanzee, fence lizard, and house mouse samples, the V4-V5 region of 16S rDNA was amplified in duplicate with barcoded 515F 926R primer pair and the high fidelity Phusion polymerase as described previously (Comeau et al., 2017 (link)). For the captive chimpanzee samples, the V4 region of 16S rDNA was amplified in duplicate with barcoded 515F 806R primer pair as described previously (Walters et al., 2016 (link)) using the high fidelity Phusion polymerase. Previous validation wok has shown that, when combined with the universal 515F primer, 926R and 806R primers are expected to yield highly concordant results (Walters et al., 2016 (link)), and downstream analyses of culture media performance within each host species were not confounded with the reverse primer used for amplification. 16S rDNA libraries were pooled in equimolar amounts and sequenced on Illumina MiSeq lane using 300+300 bp paired-end V3 chemistry following protocols established by Comeau et al., 2017 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ancient DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation, DNA extraction and PCR set-up were carried out in a dedicated aDNA laboratory at the Natural History Museum, London (NHM). PCR, qPCR and post-PCR work as well as DNA sequencing were carried out at the NHM, London. The DNA was extracted using a modified silica binding method [19 (link)], and PCR was amplified using primers specific to orang-utan, chimpanzee, gorilla or humans (electronic supplementary material, table S5). In order to infer robust consensus sequences and to monitor for contamination and miscoding lesions, we pooled the PCR products into equimolar ratios and sequenced them at approximately 1% of a full Illumina MiSeq lane. Consensus DNA sequences have been uploaded to NCBI GenBank (KX533938-KX533939). See the electronic supplementary material for full description of methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!