The mean and standard deviations (mean ± SD) were calculated for all measurements. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software ver. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for variance analysis among the facial type groups. The significance level was set at α = 0.05.
Spss statistical software ver 17
Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States
SPSS statistical software version 17.0 is a data analysis tool developed by IBM. It provides a range of statistical functions to help users analyze and interpret data. The software supports a variety of data types and can be used for tasks such as regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and data visualization.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
6 protocols using spss statistical software ver 17
1
Facial Type Variance Analysis
2
Comparative Statistical Analysis of Biological Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The tests were performed at least three times unless otherwise specified. The data were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) by SPSS statistical software (ver.17.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). A comparison of means was carried out using Duncan’s test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3
Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software ver. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and the independent t-test was used to compare the data obtained from good and poor sleepers. Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between PSQI, ESS, ISI, and SSS and the independent variables-BDI, MBI, hand strength test (Jamar dynamometer), the Purdue pegboard test, and the 9-hole peg test. A p-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4
Comparing Toxicity and Cosmesis Outcomes
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS statistical software ver. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were compiled to characterize the patient populations. Toxicities and cosmesis were compared across the variables of interest using either chi-squared tests or ANOVA. Significance was assessed at 0.05.
5
Evaluating Post-Operative Pain and Sensory Recovery
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software ver. 17.0. Continuous and normally distributed variables are expressed as means and standard deviations, and non-normally distributed variables are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges. Before the operation and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the operation, the VAS scores of the two groups were analyzed using the paired t-test. Statistical analysis of the SSR before the operation, and 1 and 3 months after the operation in the two groups was also performed using the paired t-test. P-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate significant differences.
6
Statistical Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Variables
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Continuous variables were expressed as median and range or mean ± standard deviation. Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentages. The AX2 test (with Yates continuity correction in a 2 × 2 contingency table) was used for nominal data. Numerical variables were compared using a Student’s t test. Data were considered significant at p < 0.05. SPSS statistical software ver. 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!