The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using gotaq qpcr master mix system

1

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted and genomic DNA was removed using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega), with a 1:1 mixture of random and Oligo (dT)15 primers. All qPCR reactions were performed using the GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix System (Promega). Validated primers were purchased from Qiagen (see Supplemental Table 1). qPCR reactions (in duplicate) were performed using a 7300 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA): Hot-Start activation at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 15 sec) and annealing/extension (55°C for 60 sec). Relative gene expression was determined using the Pfaffl method (Pfaffl, 2001 (link)) to account for differential primer efficiencies. The Cq value for 18s ribosomal RNA (Rn18s) was used for normalization. The Cq value for naïve, undifferentiated cultures was used as the reference point, and the data are reported as “Fold Change from Naive.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Lin28 and miR-107 in Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-time q-PCR analyses were performed with the ABI Prism 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Briefly, a 20-μl reaction mixture containing 2 μl of cDNA template and 1 μl each of sense and anti-sense primers (Promega Gotaq q-PCR® Master Mix system, Madison, WI, USA) was amplified as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 40 s. Real-time q-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate for each sample, and the mean value was used to calculate mRNA levels. Quantitative analysis was performed using the comparative CT method. The Lin28 and miR-107 copy numbers in tumor tissues were normalized to the mRNA copy numbers of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to obtain the value 2 −Δ CT. The primer sequences are as follows in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative RT-PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were performed as described (28 (link)). Oligonucleotide primer pairs for qPCR were designed to be either on exon boundaries or spanning at least one intron (Table S1). qPCR was performed using the GoTaq qPCR Master Mix system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Gene expression was normalized to the expression of 36B4 using the equation 2^- (Ct gene of interest – Ct housekeeping gene).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using the GoScript Reverse Transcription (RT) system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). RNA levels were measured by qRT-PCR on Roche Light Cycler 480 using the GoTaq qPCR Master Mix system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The expression of lncRNA and mRNA was normalized with GAPDH. The primer sequences are listed in the supplementary material.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Viral Load and Cytokine Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Viral load was determined using the TCID50 method (according to Schogler et al., 2015 (link); more details are given in the Supporting Information). RNA extraction (using RNA Clean & Concentrator‐5 w/Zymo‐Spin IC Columns; Zymo Research), cDNA synthesis (using 200 ng of total RNA and the GoScript Reverse Transcription System; Promega, cat.no. A5003), quantitative real‐time RT‐PCR (384‐well plates, duplicates for target genes, quadruplicates for the housekeeping gene; GoTaq qPCR Master Mix system, (Promega, cat.no. A6002) were performed according to manufacturer's instructions (details are given in the Supporting Information). Protein levels were measured using a human cytokine/chemokine magnetic bead panel (Milliplex MAP kit, Millipore/Merck), a Magpix Luminex instrument and the xPONENT software (version 4.2, Luminex Corp) according to manufacturer's instructions (single measurements and overnight incubation at 4℃; more details are given in the Supporting Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Total RNA Purification and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For genomic DNA PCR, genomic DNA was purified with the Wizard Plus Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega, Wisconsin-Madison, USA). PCR was performed using rTaq DNA polymerase (Takara, Tokyo, Japan) and the PCR primers were listed in Table S2. The experiment was repeated at least 3 times.
Quantitative PCR was performed with GoTaq qPCR master mix system (Promega) and analyzed in the LightCycler 480 system (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The primers were also listed in Table S2. Data were normalized to 18sRNA and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) expressions. The values shown in the graph represent mean ± S.E.M. Every experiment was repeated at least 3 times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcriptomic Analysis of Mouse Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted and genomic DNA was removed using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Microarray analyses were performed by the Boston University Microarray and Sequencing Resource using GeneChip® Mouse Gene 2.0ST arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). For RT-qPCR analyses, cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega), with a 1:1 mixture of random and Oligo (dT)15 primers. All qPCR reactions were performed using the GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix System (Promega). The qPCR reactions were performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA): hot-start activation at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 15 sec) and annealing/extension (55°C for 60 sec). The primer sequences are provided in Table S1. Relative gene expression was determined using the Pfaffl method to account for differential primer efficiencies (Pfaffl 2001 (link)), using the geometric mean of the Cq values for beta-2-microglobulin (B2m) and 18s ribosomal RNA (Rn18s) for normalization. The Cq value from naïve, undifferentiated cultures was used as the reference point. Data are reported as “Relative Expression”, unless log-transformed and reported as “Log Relative Expression.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted and genomic DNA was removed using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega), with a 1:1 mixture of random and Oligo (dT)15 primers. All qPCR reactions were performed using the GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix System (Promega). Validated primers were purchased from Qiagen Inc. (Valencia, CA)(Table S1). Sequences for the Abca1 and Srebp1c primers, which were synthesized, were previously reported.35 (link) qPCR reactions were performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA): Hot-Start activation at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles of denaturation (95°C for 15 sec) and annealing/extension (55°C for 60 sec). Relative gene expression was determined using the Pfaffl method,36 (link) using the threshold value for 18s ribosomal RNA (Rn18s) for normalization. No significant differences were observed in the expression of Rn18s across the different times or treatments (data not shown). The Cq value from naïve, undifferentiated cultures was used as the reference point, and data were reported as “Fold Change from Naive.” Expression data from medium wells and Vh wells were averaged for each experiment and reported as “Med/Vh.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Analysis of miRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted with a TRIzol reagent (Takara, Nogihigashi, Japan), and was transcribed reversely in cDNA with the GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). RT-PCR analysis was conducted using a GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Three wells were repeated in each sample. With internal control of Gapdh, the 2−ΔΔCt method was utilized to calculate the relative expression levels of genes. The specific primers for miRNAs were designed using stem-loop RT-PCR. U6 was used as the miRNA reference. All of the primers are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Adipogenic and Osteogenic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following Nile Red staining, the staining solution was removed, and the cultures were washed two times with PBS. Then, total RNA was extracted and genomic DNA was removed using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). For RT-qPCR analyses, cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the GoScript™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega), with a 1:1 mixture of random and Oligo (dT)15 primers. All qPCR reactions were performed using the GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix System (Promega). Validated primers (18s ribosomal RNA (Rn18s): QT01036875, PPARγ1/2 (Pparg): QT00100296, fatty acid binding protein 4 (Fabp4): QT00091532, perilipin (Plin1): QT00150360, runt related transcription factor 2 (Runx2): QT00102193, Osterix (Osx): QT00293181, osteocalcin (Bglap): QT00259406O) were purchased from Qiagen. qPCR reactions were performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). Relative gene expression was determined using the Pfaffl method (Pfaffl, 2001 (link)), using the threshold value for Rn18s for normalization. No significant differences were observed in the expression of Rn18s across the different treatments (data not shown). The Cq value from naïve, undifferentiated cultures was used as the reference point. Data were normalized to the expression in cultures treated with 100 nM Rosi and reported as “% Rosi Control.”
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!