The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Methanol

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, China, Germany, Belgium, Canada, France, India, Australia, Portugal, Spain, New Zealand, Ireland, Sweden, Italy, Denmark, Poland, Malaysia, Switzerland, Macao, Sao Tome and Principe, Bulgaria

Methanol is a colorless, volatile, and flammable liquid chemical compound. It is commonly used as a solvent, fuel, and feedstock in various industrial processes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 986 protocols using methanol

1

HPLC Analysis of Diverse Organic Solutes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The test solutes used in this study were obtained from various suppliers. Toluene, propylbenzene, butylbenzene, biphenyl, phenol, benzoic acid, aniline, N,N-dimethylaniline, caffeine, o-cresol, p-cresol, m-cresol, phloroglucinol, bromobenzene, chlorobenzene, nitrobenzene, anisole, naphthoic acid, acetophenone, 2,4-dimethylphenol, 2,6-dimethylphenol, p-nitrophenol, o-nitrophenol, m-nitrophenol, uracil, naproxen, ibuprofen, nifedipine, and bupropion were acquired from Sigma–Aldrich. Benzaldehyde, naphthalene, and benzyl alcohol were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. All chemicals were used as received without any further purification. Individual samples were prepared in methanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as the solvent at a concentration of 10−2 mM; the mixture containing the various components was prepared in methanol at a concentration of 2 mM each. Samples were filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter before injection into the chromatograph. HPLC-grade methanol from Thermo Fisher Scientific was used as the mobile phase modifier. Food-grade CO2 was purchased from PRAXAIR and used as the mobile phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemicals used for extraction including hexane, methanol, and ethyl acetate were of analytical grade and purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Massachusetts, USA). The compounds, 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Folin-Ciocalteu's phenol reagent, potassium ferricyanide (K3[Fe(CN)6]), sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), ferric chloride (FeCl3), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), 2,2′-azinothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS), and potassium persulfate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phenolic acid standards (Vanillic, protocatechuic acid, Cinnamic acid, Chlorogenic, Gallic, Caffeic, and p-Coumaric), hydrochloric acid (37%) (HCl), and trolox were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Hamburg, Germany), while methanol, acetic acid, acetonitrile, and phosphoric acid used in the HPLC analyses were of HPLC grade and purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, (Loughborough, and Leicestershire, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted Metabolomics Profiling by UHPLC-Q Exactive HF-X

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Instruments: Q Exactive™ HF-X (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), Vanquish UHPLC (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA); Chromatographic columns: Hypesil Gold column (C18) (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The column temperature was 40 °C, and the flow rate was 0.2 mL/min. In positive mode: mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid (Thermo Fisher, USA); mobile phase B was methanol (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). In negative mode: mobile phase A was pH 9.0, 5 mM ammonium acetate (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA); mobile phase B was methanol.
The scan range was m/z 100–1500, spray voltage was 3.5 kV; sheath gas flow rate was 35 psi; Aux gas flow rate is 10 L/min; Capillary temp was 320 °C; S-lens RF level was 60; Aux gas heater temp was 350 °C. Mobile phase gradient settings: Time: 0–1.5 min, A: 98%, B: 2%; Time: 3 min, A: 15%, B: 85%; Time: 10 min, A: 0, B: 100%; Time: 10.1–12 min, A: 98%, B: 2%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HIF-1α Expression in PC12 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PC12 cells were seeded at 4 × 104 cells /mL and incubated for 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Following incubation, the cells were fixed with 80% ice-cold methanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 5 min and the methanol was removed. After permeabilisation with 0.1% PBS/Tween for 20 min, cells were incubated in a blocking solution consisting of 10% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) with 0.3 M glycine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with primary monoclonal antibodies for HIF-1α (ab16066) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at a concentration of 2 µg/1 × 106 cells and incubated for 30 min at 22 °C. The primary antibody-blocking solution was then removed via centrifugation at 300× g for 3 min. The cells were washed with PBS, centrifuged for 3 min at 300× g and then incubated with 500 µL of secondary antibody DyLight 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) (1/500 dilution) for 30 min at 22 °C. An FC500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) was used to analyse the samples. At least 10,000 events were collected per sample. Data were analysed using Flowing Software (Turku Centre for Biotechnology, Turku, Finland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction and Analysis of Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol and trifluoroacetic acid for the extraction of fractions were obtained from Fischer Scientific (Leicester, UK). For the pomace extraction, citric acid monohydrate was used as an acidifying agent, obtained from Penta Chemicals (Prague, Czech Republic). The carriers used in the microencapsulation process were maltodextrine 18–20 DE obtained from Astron Chemicals (Attica, Greece) and arabic gum powder from Nexira (Rouen, France). The materials used for the analysis of the samples were Folin Ciocalteu phenol reagent (2N) from Carlo Erba Reagents (Barcelona, Spain), sodium acetate 3-hydrate from Panreac Quimica SA (Barcelona, Spain), sodium carbonate anhydrous from Penta Chemicals (Prague, Czech Republic), sodium hydroxide from Panreac Quimica SA (Barcelona, Spain), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany) and gallic acid (98% w/w) obtained from Acrōs Organics (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). The standard compounds used were rutin trihydrate from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), cyanidin galactoside from Extrasynthese S.A. (Genay Cedex, France) and chlorogenic acid from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Water, acetonitrile and Methanol for HPLC analyses of the samples were obtained from Fischer Scientific (Leicester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolite Extraction from Frozen Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen tissues of CBC1 (100 mg) were individually ground with liquid nitrogen, and the ground tissues were resuspended in 500 μL of prechilled 80% methanol (Thermo, United States) and 0.1% formic acid (Thermo, United States) for vortexing. The samples were incubated on ice for 5 min and then centrifuged at 15000 rpm in a refrigerated centrifuge (ST16R, Thermo, United States) at 4 °C for 10 min. Some of the supernatant was diluted to obtain a solution containing 53% methanol (Thermo, United States) with LC-MS grade water. The samples were subsequently transferred to fresh Eppendorf tubes (500 μL) and then centrifuged at 15000×g and 4 °C for 20 min. Finally, the supernatants were injected into a HPLC-MS/MS system for analysis. In addition, equal volumes of the different experimental samples were taken and blended as quality control (QC) samples, which were used to evaluate the stability of the results of the whole experimental process and the correlation analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Embryo Fixation and Staging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dechorionated embryos were transferred to a 1.5 mL microtube and mixed in 362.5 μL PBT (0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS), 12.5 μL 10x PBS, and 125 μL 16% formaldehyde, methanol-free (w/v) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Embryos in the 4% formaldehyde fixing solution (w/v) were shaken for 15 min at 200 rpm using a mini rotator/shaker (Thermo Scientific). Fixing solution was discarded, 500 μL heptane (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 500 μL methanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were added, and samples were vigorously shaken by hand/vortex for 2 min. heptane, methanol, and embryos in the interphase were removed and discarded. Samples were washed 3 times with methanol before resuspension in 1 mL PBT containing 1 μL Hoechst 33,342 (20 mM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). After a 10 min incubation at RT, 2 × 1 min and 1 × 10 min washes with 1 mL PTB were carried out to remove excess dye. Embryos were then staged using the ECLIPSE Ts2 microscope (Nikon) based on Foe et al.,10 (link) and reference images for nuclear cycle divisions from others.36 (link),37 Embryos in PBT were kept on ice during staging. Finally, PBT was removed, TRIzol was added to pooled embryos, and samples were stored at −80°C until RNA was isolated using a standard TRIzol RNA isolation protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ginsenoside Rg1 Metabolite Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ginsenoside Rg1 (purity > 98%) was purchased from Herbpurify CO., LTD (Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China). DSS (molecular weight: 36-50 kDa) was bought from MP Biomedicals Inc. (Aurora, OH, USA). MS-grade formic acid was purchased from TCI (Shanghai, China) and methanol was purchased from Thermo (USA). Ultra-pure water was produced by a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, MA, USA). methanol (Purity > 99.0%) used was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA). The reference substance of Trp and its metabolites used were as follows: Nicotinamide (Nam, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, China); Indole-3-formaldehyde (IAld, Yuanye, Shanghai, China); 3-Indolepropionic acid (IPA, Aladdin, Shanghai, China); Tryptophan (Trp, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, China); and 3-Indolyllactic acid (ILA, Aladdin, Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Phenolic Compounds in Grape Skin Fermentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The standard products of p-hydroxycinnamic acid, neochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, rutin, polydatin, rosmarinic acid, and epicatechin gallate (Shanghai Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were weighed, and 0.1 mg mL−1 solution was prepared using methanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The grape skin fermentation solution by lactic acid bacteria was extracted with a HyperSep C18 column (Thermo Scientific, Bellefonte, PA), eluted with methanol–water (1 : 1, v/v), and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter. Fermentation components were detected (UltiMate3000 HPLC System, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using the following chromatographic conditions: Accucore C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 2.6 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific), flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1, detection wavelength of 285 nm, injection volume of 10 L, column temperature of 30 °C, collection time of 75 min, and mobile phases A for acetonitrile (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and B for 0.1% aqueous acetic acid solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Bile Acid Standards

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
72 BA standards (56 unlabeled and 16 deuterated) were characterized in this manuscript. The 56 unlabeled BA standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and Steraloids (Newport, RI) and the 16 deuterium labeled BAs were purchased from C/D/N Isotopes Inc. (Point-Claire, Quebec Canada). Each BA standard was dissolved in high purity methanol purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA) to a concentration of 5 mg/mL. Prior to analysis, each BA standard was further diluted with methanol to a final concentration of 0.5 μM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!