The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

104 protocols using up50h

1

Evaluating Cytotoxicity of Si/SiO2 Quantum Dots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RAW 264.7 (subclone TIB-71) cell line (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) is derived from a murine Abelson leukemia virus-induced tumor and exhibits a monocyte/macrophage morphology. Cells were initiated, maintained, and propagated in vitro according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, RAW 264.7 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum to a final concentration of 10%. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 95% humidity. For subculture, cells were scraped and centrifuged before seeding at a density of 5 × 104 cells/mL (0.8 × 104 cells/cm2). Cell treatments involved exposing cultured RAW 264.7 cells at 60–70% confluence to Si/SiO2 QDs at concentrations of 5 and 15 μg/mL for all assays, except for the MTT assay, where additional QD doses of 25 and 100 μg/mL were also employed. The cells were exposed to the QDs for different time intervals of 6, 12, and 24 h. To prepare the QDs for cell treatments, the QDs were suspended in cell culture media and carefully sonicated and dispersed using an ultrasonic processor (Hielscher UP50H, Hielscher Ultrasonics GmbH, Teltow, Germany) before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanoparticle Transport Across Caco-2 and HT29-MTX Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We exposed Caco-2, HT29-MTX, and co-cultures to non-cytotoxic concentrations (20 μg/mL) of Si QDs and α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and to Lucifer Yellow (50 ug/mL). The nanoparticle suspensions were sonicated and dispersed using an ultrasonic processor Hielscher UP50H (Hielscher Ultrasonics GmbH, Germany). Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) was chosen as the transport buffer during the experiment. Particles were quantified by measuring absorbance/fluorescence levels for each (α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles: absorbance −325/500 nm; Si QDs: wavelength excitation/emission −325/644 nm; wavelength excitation/emission −405/535 nm) using the Flex Station 3 Multireader (Molecular Devices, USA). TEER monitoring was performed using a Millipore® Millicell Electrical Resistance (ERS) system (Millipore, USA). Measurements were performed at three different points of each well, and the final TEER was calculated according to the following formula:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown as monolayer culture and spheroids were lysed by adding lysis buffer (0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate), 1 mM EDTA in PBS, and freshly added protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich) and phosphatase inhibitors (Merck) and incubated for 20 min at 4°C. Lysates were sonicated (UP50H, Hielscher) for 20 s and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4°C.
Proteins were resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare). Primary antibodies against GAPDH (1:10,000, AM4300, Ambion), FAK (1:1000, 610088, BD Biosciences), or pFAKTyr397 (1:500, 3283, Cell Signaling Technology) were incubated over night at 4°C. Secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (1:30,000 for 115-035-003, 1:10,000 for 111-035-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch) were incubated for 1.5 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualised with an enhanced luminescence detection reagent with the Chemocam documentation system (Intas).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Biofilm Biomass and Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biofilms were washed thrice with phosphate-buffered saline at different time points (after 18, 20, 22, 24 h of incubation). The biofilm generated at the bottom of the well was removed by blending in an ultrasonic homogenizer (Hielscher UP50H, Teltow, Germany) for 20 s at 25% amplitude. Serial dilutions of the resultant solution were prepared and seeded in amounts of 100 μL on Sabouraud agar for C. albicans and mitis salivarius-bacitracin agar with sucrose MSBS (containing bacitracin and sucrose) for S. mutans, and then their growth was promoted for the next 48 h under microaerophilic conditions. The colony forming units (CFU/mL) were indicated. The protocol was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polymer Nanoparticles for Paclitaxel Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymer nanoparticles with (or without) Paclitaxel were prepared by the emulsification solvent evaporation method. Initially, neat polymeric nanoparticles were prepared by dissolving 50 mg of the TEHA-co-PDLLA block copolymer in 2 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) and homogenized using a probe sonicator model UP50H (Hielscher Ultrasound Technology, Teltow, Germany) at 15 W for 2 min with an aqueous phase containing either a) 10 mL of 0.5% w/v PVA solution, or b) 6 mL of 12 mM sodium cholate hydrate solution. The O/W emulsion formed was gently stirred at room temperature under a fume hood until the evaporation of the organic solvent was completed. Nanoparticles were purified by centrifugation at 9500 rpm for 20 min and reconstituted from the precipitate in fresh water (twice). The resulting suspension was lyophilized (Scanvac, Coolsafe 110-4 Pro, Labogen, Scandinavia) and stored at ambient temperature under vacuum until further study. Nanoparticles with addition of PTX were also prepared based on the above process by adding proper amounts (25 mg in 250 mg of polymer) of PTX in the organic DCM solution. Additionally, for the preparation of core–shell magnetic nanoparticles, 10 mg of superparamagnetic manganese ferrite nanoparticles were added in the PTX-polymer DCM solution and the process was following as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial Proteome Extraction and Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two mL bioreactor liquid was centrifuged (3200× g, 10 min, 4 °C) and the pellet was solved in 1 mL lysis buffer (8M Urea, 2M Thiourea, 1 mM Phenylmethylsulfonylfluorid). Bacteria were disrupted by bead beating (FastPrep-24, MP Biomedicals, Sanra Ana, CA, USA; 5.5 ms, 1 min, 3 cycles) followed by ultra-sonication (UP50H, Hielscher, Teltow, Germany; cycle 0.5, amplitude 60%) and centrifugation (10,000× g, 10 min) [28 (link)]. The supernatant was used for protein concentration determination using the PierceTM 660 nm Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Ten micrograms of protein lysate was incubated with 25 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol (in 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate) for 1 h and 100 mM iodoacetamide (in 20 mM ammonium bicarbonate) for 30 min. Protein cleaning, cleavage and peptide cleaning were done with hydrophobic Sera-Mag SpeedBead Carboxylate-Modified Magnetic Particles (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) as described elsewhere [29 (link)]. Proteins were digested with Trypsin (1:50), peptides were eluted with 2% dimethylsulfoxide solved in water without fragmentation. Peptides were solved in 0.1% formic acid for mass spectrometric measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimizing Lipid Nanocapsules for Miconazole Nitrate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on preformulation studies (data unseen) and previous reports, MN loaded LNCs were prepared using lipid matrix of both oleic acid and Labrafac® oil with ratio 1:1 (Kamel & Basha, 2013; Eissa et al., 2015 (link); Kiani et al., 2017 ). The previously mentioned oil mixture has shown high solubilization power for MN referred to the long chain of oleic acid and the HLB value. Briefly, 20 mg of MN was mixed with lipid matrix (melted in water bath at 80 °C) at different ratios (1:2, 1:3, and 1:4) where soy phosphatidylcholine was used as surfactant (Table 1). A hot aqueous solution was prepared by dissolving soy phosphatidylcholine (5 g) in PG (10 g) in a mass ratio of 1:2. The aqueous solution was added using syringe to the previous lipid phase and the mixture was stirred at 1000 rpm for 15 min at room temperature to obtain the required nanocapsules suspension. The obtained LNCs suspensions were ultrasonicated for 5 min using probe sonicator (UP50H, Hielscher, Teltow, Germany). The composition of prepared polymeric and LNCs formulations is shown in Table 1. The effect of different ratios of MN:lipid matrix (1:2, 1:3, and 1:4) on PS, ZP, and %EE was further studied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Lysis and Protein Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRC-5 and CCD-1070Sk cells were collected from culture flasks, washed with PBS and the cell lysates were obtained by sonication (30 s × 3 times) on ice with an ultrasonic processor (Hielscher UP50H, Teltow, Germany). The homogenate was centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and the supernatants (total proteic extracts) were collected for biochemical assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Formulation and Characterization of EEP-NPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formulations of EEP-NPs (or Empty-NPs) were prepared using the modified oil-in-water (o/w) single emulsion solvent evaporation method with some modifications [9 (link)]. Briefly, an organic solution consisting of 100 mg/mL EEP and 100 mg PLGA dissolved in DCM was prepared and added dropwise to an aqueous solution containing 0.4% (w/v) PVA and 1% (w/v) CS to obtain the ratio of 1:2 (v/v) of organic and aqueous phases. The resulting solution was stirred, and then sonicated using an ultrasonic processor UP50H (Hielscher Ultrasonics, Hielscher, NJ, USA) at 90% amplitude for 30 min within an ice bath. For complete polymerization, each mixture was stored overnight at room temperature in the dark. Afterwards, the solution was centrifuged at 8800× g for 40 min at 4 °C to obtain NPs. The NPs were further washed once and reconstituted with deionized water before lyophilization. The NP samples were stored at −20 °C until used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Metabolite Extraction from Frozen Hearts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polar metabolites were extracted from the hearts for the metabolic studies in accordance with Beckonert’s procedure [23 (link)]. In brief, an ice-cold solution of methanol and water (in proportion 8:2.5) was added to the tubes with frozen heart samples. The tissue was homogenized on ice using a Hielscher UP50H ultrasonic processor using 30 s pulses over a period of 5 min. The samples were incubated on ice for 15 min and then centrifuged at 1000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and the solvent was evaporated from the samples using a speed vacuum concentrator. The material was re-suspended in 580 μL of phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (in D2O containing Trimethylsilylpropanoic acid (TSP) and NaN3). The samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 12.000 × g for 5 min and for each sample 550 μL of the supernatant was transferred into the NMR tube (Wilmad Labglass, USA) and kept at 4°C until the NMR analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!