The results are presented as median and ranges for qualitative data or as numbers and percentages for quantitative data. The hypnosis (experimental) and control groups were defined by intention to treat. The comparison between the two groups was carried out using Wilcoxon tests for the quantitative variables and Fisher's exact tests for the qualitative variables. A multivariate generalized linear model was used to identify factors that may influence the STAI Y A score before coronary angiography (age, sex, group, anxiety trait, anxiety state the day before, belief in the effectiveness of hypnosis in general and belief in the effectiveness of hypnosis for its own sake). The significance threshold was set at 5%. Bonferroni's corrections were applied for multiple tests where applicable. All analyzes were performed with SAS/STAT software version 9.4 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC).
Sas stat software version 9
SAS/STAT software version 9.4 is a comprehensive statistical analysis package designed to analyze data and perform advanced statistical modeling. It provides a wide range of statistical procedures and techniques for data management, exploration, modeling, and inference. SAS/STAT 9.4 supports a variety of statistical methods, including regression analysis, analysis of variance, multivariate analysis, survival analysis, and more.
Lab products found in correlation
109 protocols using sas stat software version 9
Hypnosis for Anxiety Reduction in Coronary Angiography
The results are presented as median and ranges for qualitative data or as numbers and percentages for quantitative data. The hypnosis (experimental) and control groups were defined by intention to treat. The comparison between the two groups was carried out using Wilcoxon tests for the quantitative variables and Fisher's exact tests for the qualitative variables. A multivariate generalized linear model was used to identify factors that may influence the STAI Y A score before coronary angiography (age, sex, group, anxiety trait, anxiety state the day before, belief in the effectiveness of hypnosis in general and belief in the effectiveness of hypnosis for its own sake). The significance threshold was set at 5%. Bonferroni's corrections were applied for multiple tests where applicable. All analyzes were performed with SAS/STAT software version 9.4 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC).
Trends in Antibiotic Use: A Quality Improvement Study
Statistical process control charts (SPC) were created (QI Macros, KnowWare International, Inc, Denver, CO) to display and analyze data over time. The following rules were used to determine special cause variation (SCV): one point outside the upper or lower control limits, two of three points beyond 2 SD from the mean on the same side of the center line (CL), four of five successive points beyond 1 SD from the mean on the same side of the CL, eight successive points on the same side of the CL, or six successive increasing or decreasing points (24 (link)).
Insulin Sensitivity in Crossover Study
Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS/Stat software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). Skewness (±1) and/or kurtosis (±4) were used to assess the normality of distribution. Variables were transformed using the log10 or squared root in case of abnormal distribution. Comparison of baseline characteristics between participants who dropped out and those who completed the study was conducted using 2-sample independent t tests and chi-squared tests. Comparison between groups was conducted using a mixed model with repeated measures for crossover designs (22 (link)). The model included the variables treatment (HD or AD), visit number (1–4), and selected covariables (age, sex, and BMI) as fixed effects. Subjects were included as the random effect and visits were included in the repeated statement. The interaction treatment × visit was tested for all dependent variables. Multiple comparisons between visits were conducted using Tukey's post hoc test. Data are expressed as arithmetic means ± SDs unless otherwise stated, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.
Prognostic Impact of ATM Status in Lung Cancer
Intergenerational Impacts of Parental AUD
Mortality rates were calculated per 100,000 follow-up years. After confirming that the assumptions for Cox regression were fulfilled, both crude and background-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. HRs were adjusted for year of birth, sex, highest level of parental education, and loss of ≥ 1 parent before the child reached the age of 18 years. A sensitivity analysis that included only the first births of each mother-father pair (firstborns) was performed to test whether the inclusion of siblings (dependent observations) affected the results of the Cox regression.
The data analysis for this paper was generated using SAS/STAT software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows 7 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Comparison of Rotator Cuff Repair Methods
Hemodynamic and Cytokine Response to HVHF
Continuous data are summarized as the median (25th, 75th quantile) while categorical data are summarized as proportions. Fisher’s exact test, McNemar’s test, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used as appropriate. Hemodynamic parameters were compared between controls and HVHF at both hour 0 and hour 48. Median values within each group were then compared between hour 0 and hour 48 to assess the difference in the drop of the VDI from baseline. To control the type I error rate for each variable at 0.05 given four statistical tests, an alpha level of 0.0125 was used to determine significance.
Linear mixed-effect models were used to compare trends in cytokine values over the first 48 hours between the control and HVHF groups. A random intercept and slope term was included for each subject.
Data were analyzed following the intention-to-treat principle where appropriate. All tests were two-sided at a significance level of 0.05. Analyses were conducted using R Version 3.3.1 (R Core Team) or SAS/STAT software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc.).
Multivariate Analysis of Clinical Factors
Improving Guideline Adherence for MI Diagnosis
Myocardial Contrast Imaging Comparison
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!