The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

77 protocols using vantage 256

1

Plane-wave Shear Wave Elastography of Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used plane-wave single tracking location shear wave elastography (pSTL-SWE) on a commercially available ultrasound scanner (Vantage 256, Verasonics Inc., Kirkland, WA, USA) equipped with an 11-5v linear transducer array (Vantage 256, Verasonics Inc., Kirkland, WA, USA) to perform SWE18 (link). Tumors were first located using a metal rod (1.35 mm diameter by 20 mm length) before acquiring three cross-sectional (~ 2 mm increments) SWE images. In addition, we used the bladder and the metal clips on both ends of the tumor to localize the tumor, as illustrated in (Supplementary Fig. 1). The tumor segmentation was performed in the ultrasound images. The cross-sectional area was computed for three acquired cross-sections, and the mean cross-sectional area was used as a surrogate of tumor volume. SWS and SWA values were computed using the time-of-flight18 (link) and frequency shift19 (link) methods. pSTL-SWE imaging was performed at three different times: before injecting tumor cells (day 0), during treatments (days 10 and 12 post-tumor cell injection), and post-SCRT (days 7, 9, 11, 14, and 16). We used ultrasound images to guide us as we manually segmented all tumor cross-sections. We calculated the mean SWS and SWA for each time point across all the segmented regions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histogram Matching for Ultrasound Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample data were acquired using the Verasonics Vantage 256 (Verasonics Inc., Kirkland, WA) using the P4-2v phased array transducer. Channel data were stored for individual element transmissions with center frequency 4.5 MHz for each element on the array. Synthetic aperture focusing was applied to coherently sum together the transmissions from all elements at each point in the image [35 ]. The ATS 549 general and small parts phantom (CIRS Inc., Norfolk, VA) was imaged to visualize speckle background, contrast lesion targets (−15 dB and −6 dB), and point targets.
To illustrate the impact of histogram matching across a wide spectrum of signal and image processing, we selected four representative imaging methods:
Histogram matching was performed using 256 bins in all cases. The partial histogram matching method was implemented using the mean and variance matching of equations (8) and (9).
In order to make the histogram matching methods used in this work accessible to others in the imaging community, a MATLAB implementation and sample phantom data have been made available at https://github.com/nbottenus/histogram_matching (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4124190).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phantom Cyst Imaging Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phantom acquisitions of 2, 3, and 4 mm anechoic cyst targets (Model 549, ATS Laboratories, Bridgeport, CT) were acquired using the Verasonics Vantage 256 (Verasonics, Inc., Kirkland, WA, USA), and the 64-element P4-2v phased array transducer imaging at 4 MHz with a 4 cm transmit focus.
A matched model of the P4-2v and phantom target were also simulated using Field II. White noise was bandpass-filtered to the transducer bandwidth, and added to the simulated channel echo data to mimic the experimental channel SNR as predicted by the lag-one coherence measured in a speckle region at the focal depth [29 ].
B-Mode and MIST (3-parameter) images were formed of the phantom and matched simulation datasets. MIST images were formed using a single-sample estimate (0λ) of the covariance matrix, as well as a spatially-averaged covariance matrix over a wavelength (1λ) kernel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluation of LoSCAN Imaging Feasibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clinical feasibility of LoSCAN was evaluated using matched DAS and LoSCAN images generated from channel data acquired from a collection of in vivo liver and fetal targets. All data were collected using a C5-2v curvilinear array on the Verasonics Vantage 256 research scanner (Verasonics, Inc., Kirkland, WA, USA) under Investigational Review Board (IRB) protocols approved by the Duke University Medical Center. Acquisitions were performed with a pulse-inversion imaging sequence using a 2.4-MHz transmit frequency, 60-mm focus, and F/2 focal geometry. Fundamental and harmonic images were formed by taking either the difference or sum of interleaved noninverted and inverted channel data and filtering across the appropriate bandwidth. LoSCAN was performed using coherence estimates averaged over the default 5 × 5 λ kernel size. Details of the in vivo data set used in this study are outlined in Table I.
Using adjacent regions of uniform speckle as reference, image quality metrics were measured from large vessels in the liver and hypoechoic organs inside and amniotic fluid around the fetus. For each set of matched images, comprising of fundamental and harmonic DAS and LoSCAN images, metrics were calculated using the same regions of interest (ROIs) selected based on the harmonic DAS image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing PFHnD Phase Change Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize the phase change dynamics of PFHnDs, the prepared polyacrylamide phantom embedded with PFHnDs was imaged using a Verasonics Vantage 256 ultrasound system (Verasonics Inc.) and an Nd:YAG Phocus laser (10 Hz, 5-7 ns pulse length, Opotek Inc.) operating at 1064 nm and a fluence of 46 mJ/cm2. An array transducer operating at 5 MHz (L11-4v, Verasonics Inc.) was used to capture ultrasound at a frame rate of 500 frames per second. Photoacoustic signal was captured at the rate of 10 Hz (laser PRF). Ultrasound data was collected for six frames after each laser pulse (12 milliseconds total), and pixels containing droplets were identified using compounded harmonic ultrasound difference images, similar to a previously described method [22 (link)]. To visualize PFHnD recondensation dynamics over time, linear ultrasound intensity of the identified droplet pixels was plotted over multiple laser pulses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tracking Muscle Dynamics via Ultrasound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A single healthy proband performed standing calf raises (Fig. 10) by doing slow, smooth, and controlled movements. This particular exercise was selected to provide largest possible variations of the pennation angle during the acquisition. A linear array US probe (Ge-9LD, General Electric Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) was attached to the lateral head of the Gastrocnemius muscle. For a proper attachment of the US probe to the skin surface, we integrated the transducer into a custom-made foam fixation, which is kept in position by elastic bands. The position of the array was adjusted to minimize out-of-plane movements and maximize the visibility of the aponeuroses and fascicles as indicated in Fig. 3 of [5] .
The probe was connected to a Verasonics Vantage 256 (Verasonics, Kirkland, WA, USA) research Ultrasound system. The platform was programmed to emit 15 plane waves per frame with a maximum inclination angle of 15 degrees and capture 10 seconds of muscle contractions. The data acquisition frame rate was limited to 15 FPS during the measurements.
All the experimental procedures presented in this paper followed the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Shear Wave Elastography Phantom Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The USE acquisition system consisted of a Vantage 256 (Verasonics, Kirkland, WA, USA) ultrasound system with a L11-5V transducer and is shown in Fig. 1(right). The imaging and push frequencies were 7.8 MHz and the pulse duration was 128 μs. A thin layer of ultrasound gel was applied to the phantom surface. Special care was taken to ensure no bubbles were present. A shear wave was generated by the transducer at a focal point 4 mm below the surface and directly under the center of the transducer. Each push utilized 32 elements. After each measurement, the sample was removed and replaced to test repeatability. Five trials were completed for each phantom.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Shear Wave Imaging Phantom Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The USE acquisition system consisted of a Vantage 256 (Verasonics, Kirkland, WA, USA) ultrasound system with a L11–5V transducer and is shown in Fig. 1(right). The imaging and push frequencies were 7.8 MHz and the pulse duration was 128 μs. A thin layer of ultrasound gel was applied to the phantom surface. Special care was taken to ensure no bubbles were present. A shear wave was generated by the transducer at a focal point 4 mm below the surface and directly under the center of the transducer. Each push utilized 32 elements. After each measurement, the sample was removed and replaced to test repeatability. Five trials were completed for each phantom.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrasound-Mediated Microbubble Cavitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 250-kHz spherically focused single-element transducer (H-115, Sonic Concepts, Bothell, WA) was placed at the bottom of a degassed water tank facing upwards and aligned to focus at each cell sample. The focal depth of the transducer was 45 mm. Cells or tumors were exposed to sine-wave ultrasound-bursts of 1000 cycles at a 30-Hz pulse repetition frequency (PRF) (duty cycle of 12%) for a total duration of 3 min. The peak negative pressure (PNP) generated in the region of interest was 500 kPa. MB oscillations in vitro were monitored by passive cavitation detection (PCD) using an unfocused and single-element transducer at a frequency of 2.25 MHz (V204-RM, Panametrics). The PCD transducer was aligned to the focus of the therapeutic 250-kHz transducer. MB distribution and destruction in tumors were monitored by real-time ultrasound imaging in contrast mode and PCD using a CL15-7 ultrasound transducer probe (128 elements, 0.18 mm pitch, Philips/ATL). Received radio frequency (RF) data were displayed and post processed by using a programmable ultrasound system Vantage 256 (Verasonics, Kirkland, WA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrasound Imaging with Spatial Compounding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Verasonics Vantage 256 research platform (Verasonics, Bothell, WA, USA) was used to drive an L7–4 Linear array transducer with 128 elements, center frequency 5 MHz and 60% Bandwidth (L7–4, ATL Ultrasound, Bothell, WA, USA). A 3-plane wave spatial compounding acquisition imaging sequence, involving the transmission of 3 plane waves at angles θe (−10°, 0°, 10°) was implemented at a pulse repetition frequency of 10000 Hz. This particular acquisition sequence was chosen, because it has shown to meet the requirements for temporal resolution and imaging quality to perform PWI processing[25 (link)], while also it provides sufficiently large angles for vector Doppler imaging. The sequence was calibrated so that it satisfies the FDA safety guidelines prior to performing in vivo scans. The parameters involving ultrasound acquisitions are summarized in TABLE I.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!