The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Inveon micropet microct rodent model scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States

The Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner is a preclinical imaging system designed for small animal research. It combines positron emission tomography (microPET) and computed tomography (microCT) technologies to provide high-resolution, multimodal imaging capabilities for the study of small laboratory animals, such as mice and rats.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using inveon micropet microct rodent model scanner

1

Preclinical PET Imaging of Pembrolizumab

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET scans were acquired in an Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, TN, USA). Mice were intravenously (IV) injected with 5–10 MBq of 89Zr-Df-Pembrolizumab for imaging. Rats received a 37 MBq IV dose of 89Zr-Df-Pembrlizumab. For whole-body rat imaging, 30 min PET scans were acquired using a continuous bed motion method. A total of 30 passes through a 30 cm transaxial field of view were recorded. Rat reconstructions were performed using the 2D ordered-subset expectation maximization reconstruction. For mice, 40 million coincidence events static scans were recorded, and images were reconstructed using the 3D ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm. Region-of-interest (ROI) analysis of the images performed to determine tracer uptake in major organs/tissues using the Inveon Research Workplace software (Siemens Medical Solutions, TN, USA). Quantitative results were given as percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Labeling and Evaluation of 64Cu-Nanonaps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For labelling, 37 MBq of 64CuCl2 was diluted in 300 µL of 0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5) and added to 400 OD860 ONc nanonaps for 30 minutes at 37 °C. The 64Cu-nanonaps were purified by centrifugal filtration and re-suspended in 500 µL of PBS for further use. For in vitro stability, one OD860 of 64Cu-nanonaps was re-suspended in 1 mL of SGF or SIF and incubated at 37 °C with stirring. Portions of the mixture (50 µL) were sampled at different time points and washed by centrifugal filtration for analysis. Radioactivity was measured by a Wizard2 gamma counter (Perkin Elmer).
PET scans were performed using an Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens). After overnight fasting, each BALB/c mouse was gavaged ~7.4 MBq of 64Cu-nanonaps (100 OD860). 5–10 minute static PET scans were performed at various time points post-injection. Images were reconstructed using a maximum a posteriori algorithm without scatter correction. After 24 hours mice were euthanized and biodistribution was measured with gamma-counting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Zirconium-89 PET Imaging of Tumor Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PET imaging, tumor-bearing mice were injected intravenously with ~200 μCi of 89Zr-Df-1A2G11. PET scans were performed using an Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Mice were subjected to 5–15 min of static PET scans at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 120 h post-injection. List mode scans of 40 million coincidence events were acquired for each mouse. The images were reconstructed using a maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm, with no attenuation or scatter correction. PET images were reconstructed using a three-dimensional Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization (OSEM3D) algorithm. Quantification of PET images was accomplished in an Inveon Research Workplace (Siemens Medical Solution) workstation via region of interest (ROI) analysis with tissue uptake being reported as percent injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).
Biodistribution studies were carried out to validate the PET data. Immediately after the last imaging time point (120 h post-injection), mice were euthanized. The major organs, tissues and tumors were collected and weighed before the activity was counted with a WIZARD2 automatic gamma counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The uptake was expressed as %ID/g (mean ± SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Labeling and Evaluation of 64Cu-Nanonaps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For labelling, 37 MBq of 64CuCl2 was diluted in 300 µL of 0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 5.5) and added to 400 OD860 ONc nanonaps for 30 minutes at 37 °C. The 64Cu-nanonaps were purified by centrifugal filtration and re-suspended in 500 µL of PBS for further use. For in vitro stability, one OD860 of 64Cu-nanonaps was re-suspended in 1 mL of SGF or SIF and incubated at 37 °C with stirring. Portions of the mixture (50 µL) were sampled at different time points and washed by centrifugal filtration for analysis. Radioactivity was measured by a Wizard2 gamma counter (Perkin Elmer).
PET scans were performed using an Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens). After overnight fasting, each BALB/c mouse was gavaged ~7.4 MBq of 64Cu-nanonaps (100 OD860). 5–10 minute static PET scans were performed at various time points post-injection. Images were reconstructed using a maximum a posteriori algorithm without scatter correction. After 24 hours mice were euthanized and biodistribution was measured with gamma-counting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Radiolabeled HGF for PET Imaging of c-Met

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET scans, image reconstruction, and ROI analysis of each PET scan were performed using an Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.) as described previously (20 (link)). Each tumor-bearing mouse was intravenously injected with 5–10 MBq of 64Cu-NOTA-rh-HGF and 5- to 10-min static PET scans were performed at various time points post-injection (p.i.). The tracer uptake was calculated as percentage injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) (mean ± SD; ≥3 mice per group).
Denature studies were carried out to evaluate c-Met specificity of 64Cu-NOTA-rh-HGF in vivo, where a group of 3 mice were each injected with 5–10 MBq of sonicated-denatured tracer, 64Cu-NOTA-dnrh-HGF. Biodistribution studies were performed after the last PET scans at 24 h p.i. to validate the PET data. The tumors, liver and muscle were also frozen and cryosectioned for histologic analysis. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD. Means were compared using the Student t test. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PET Imaging of Zr-89 Labeled Nivolumab

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were injected intravenously with 5 – 10 MBq of the tracer (89Zr-Df-nivolumab) prior to PET imaging. For imaging, mice were placed in supine position in the Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). Scans were performed with 40-million coincidence events static scans being recorded. Images were reconstructed using the 3D ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm and quantified via region-of-interest (ROI) analysis in the Inveon Research Workplace software (Siemens Medical Solutions). Signal quantification was expressed as the percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vivo PET Imaging of 4T1 Tumor Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small animal PET scans were performed on Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Each 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse was injected intravenously with 5–10 MBq of the radio-labeled polymer conjugate and static PET scans were performed at 0.5, 3, 6, 20, 48 and 72 h post-injection (p.i.). The images were reconstructed using a maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm, with no attenuation or scatter correction, and are presented as maximum intensity projections (MIP). For each microPET scan, three-dimensional (3D) regions-of-interest (ROIs) were drawn over the tumor and major organs by using vendor software (Inveon Research Workplace) on decay-corrected whole-body images, and are presented as percentage of injected dose per gram (%ID/g). The data obtained from the ROI analysis were used to construct the time-activity-curves (TAC) for the tumor and other major organs.
Ex vivo biodistribution studies were carried out after the final PET scan at 72 h p.i. to confirm that the quantitative values based on PET imaging truly represented the radioactivity distribution in tumor-bearing mice. The mice were euthanized and blood, 4T1 tumor, and major organs/tissues were collected and wet-weighed. The radioactivity in the tissue was measured using a gamma-counter (Perkin Elmer) and presented as %ID/g (mean ± SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Zr-89 PET Imaging of Tumor-Bearing Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PET imaging, tumor-bearing
mice were injected intravenously with ∼200 μCi of 89Zr-Df-1A2G11. PET scans were performed using an Inveon microPET/microCT
rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Mice were
subjected to 5–15 min of static PET scans at 12, 24, 48, 72,
and 120 h postinjection. List mode scans of 40 million coincidence
events were acquired for each mouse. The images were reconstructed
using a maximum a posteriori (MAP) algorithm with no attenuation or
scatter correction. PET images were reconstructed using a three-dimensional
ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM3D) algorithm. Quantification
of PET images was accomplished in an Inveon Research Workplace (Siemens
Medical Solution) workstation via region of interest (ROI) analysis
with tissue uptake being reported as percentage injected dose per
gram of tissue (%ID/g).
Biodistribution studies were carried
out to validate the PET data. Immediately after the last imaging time
point (120 h postinjection), mice were euthanized. The major organs,
tissues, and tumors were collected and weighed before the activity
was counted with a WIZARD2 automatic gamma counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham,
Massachusetts, USA). The uptake was expressed as %ID/g (mean ±
SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PET Imaging of 4T1 Breast Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PET imaging, animal studies were carried out in accordance with the University of Wisconsin-Madison Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. For tumor PET imaging studies, 1 × 106 4T1 murine breast cancer cells suspended in 30 μL of PBS were injected in the fourth mammary pad of 5–6 week old female BALB/c mice (Envigo, IN). Tumor sizes were monitored regularly, and mice were used when the tumors reached ~7 mm in diameter, typically 7–10 days post-inoculation. Twenty-five OD of 64Cu-labeled Pheo nanoparticles was injected intravenously in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice via the tail vein (n = 3). Static positron emission tomography (PET) images were acquired at different time points postinjection (p.i.) on an Inveon microPET/microCT rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). All PET images were reconstructed using a maximum a posteriori algorithm, without attenuation or scatter correction, and analyzed with Inveon Research Workplace software after decay correction. All data are presented as a percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g). Mice were euthanized after the final PET scans at 72 h postinjection, and ex vivo biodistribution studies were performed, to validate the in vivo results. Blood, tumor, and major organs were collected and wet-weighed, and radioactivity in each tissue was measured on a WIZARD2 (link)γ counter (PerkinElmer) and presented as %ID/g.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Longitudinal PET Imaging of Tumor VEGF Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U87MG tumor-bearing mice were each intravenously injected with 5-10 MBq of 64Cu-NOTA-GO-VEGF121 or 64Cu-NOTA-GO via tail vein. Serial PET scans were performed at various time points post-injection (p.i.) with using a micro PET/micro CT Inveon rodent model scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.). Data acquisition, image re-construction, and ROI analysis of the PET data were performed as described previously [26 (link), 31 (link)]. Quantitative PET data of the U87MG tumor and major organs was presented as %ID/g. After the last scan at 48 h p.i., biodistribution studies were carried out to confirm that the %ID/g values based on PET imaging truly represented the radioactivity distribution in mice. Mice were euthanized and U87MG tumor, blood and major organs/tissues were collected and wet-weighed. The radioactivity in the tissue was measured using a γ counter (PerkinElmer) and presented as %ID/g (mean ± SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!