The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using x ray diffraction

1

Comprehensive Catalyst Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physical morphology and structure of catalysts were studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI S-4700, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray diffraction (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation was used to check the film crystallinity. The Raman spectral results were collected using an Ar laser (512 nm) (Renishaw inVia RE04, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom) with a scan speed of 30 s and 1 µm spot size. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, PHI 5000 Versa Probe (25 W Al Kα), Kanagawa, Japan) was used for the chemical compositions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of Photocatalyst Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The synthesized samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) and CuKα radiation (2θ angle, range from 10 to 80; step 0.02°/s); the possible functional groups remaining on the surface of the photocatalyst were identified by FTIR (Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100, PerkinElmer Inc., Shelton, CT, USA), resolution 2 cm−1 using 32 scans in the range 4000–400 cm−1; all samples were prepared as KBr pellets (ratio 5/95 wt.%). The morphology of the prepared samples was observed with a Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyzer (Bruker Optics Inc, Billerica, MA, USA). The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the solid samples were obtained with a Jasco V-550 device (Jasco International CO, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an integrating sphere. Monitoring of the photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics was performed also with a Jasco V-550 device (Kyoto, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis and Characterization of β-Nb2ZnO6 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Niobium chloride (0.270 g) and zinc nitrate (0.2974 g) were weighed and shifted to a Teflon-lined autoclave with 20 mL of distilled water. After stirring, urea (0.2402 g) and ammonium fluoride (0.148 g) were added to the mixture. After stirring, the autoclave was heated at 200 °C for 12 h. The obtained precipitation was centrifuged and washed repeatedly using deionized water, followed by washing with ethanol, and dried overnight (60 °C). The samples were calcined at 500 °C and 700 °C in the furnace and assigned as (A) and (B), respectively.
The morphology and size of β-Nb2ZnO6 nanoparticles (A) and (B) were determined by a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (FEI, Morgagni 268, Brno, Czech Republic) and X-ray diffraction (Rigaku, Japan) quantified with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Ǻ) with a 1° per minute speed of scanning (range 10–80°). Surface area (BET) was determined by Micromeritics ASAP 2020 PLUS (Norcross, GA, USA) by degassing the samples (180 °C) and by employing N2 adsorption data with a range of relative pressure (P/P0) from 0.0 to 1.0. A diffuse reflectance UV-visible spectrophotometer was used for recording the UV-Visible spectra (UV-Vis, JASCO V-750, Great Dunmow, Essex, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fabrication of Aligned PVDF-TrFE Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In step 1, PVDF-TrFE nanofibers were fabricated through a standard electrospinning process. In brief, a solution of 18 wt% 70:30 PVDF-TrFE (Piezotech) was mixed into a 1:1 ratio of dimethylformamide (DMF) and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). The solution was electrospun using a 20-gauge needle, a flow rate of 600 μl/hr, and an applied voltage of 12kV. A rotating drum collector was used to create aligned fibers [1 (link)], [13 ], [14 ], at a distance of 9 cm from the needle, and a rotation speed of 3,000 rpm. The needle was mounted on a linear motor to create a more highly uniform fiber mat. Due to the in-situ poling, no further electrical poling or thermal annealing processes were required [15 ], [16 (link)]. The electrospinning process forms fibers from 500 nm to 1 μm in diameter, with large bulk alignment [1 (link)]. The as-electrospun nanofibers were characterized using X-ray diffraction (Rigaku) in Fig. 3a. The key peak at 19.8° represents the piezoelectric β-phase of the semi-crystalline polymer, PVDF-TrFE [17 ], [18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Histidine-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The as-prepared His@MNPs were characterized by using scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). To examine the element compositions, the energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was employed. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of His@MNPs were obtained using FT-IR spectrophotometer (FT-IR-4600, JASCO, Easton, MD, USA). The crystal structure of nanomaterials was determined by utilizing X-ray diffraction (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of PBAT-Coated Paper

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FTIR (Perkin-Elmer Spectrum Two) spectra in the 4000–400 cm−1 spectral range were used for the ATR-FTIR spectra. X-ray diffraction (Rigaku, Cedar Park, TX, USA, PANALYTICAL) was performed in the 10° to 80° 2θ scan range at a scan rate of 0.50 min−1. SEM (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) was used to study the structure of the PBAT film-coated paper. The coated paper morphology was measured with an SEM working at 15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Diamond/Aluminum Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to investigate the phase composition of the diamond/Al composites before and after corrosion at a scan rate of 10 °/min, using Cu-Kα radiation. Microstructural characterization of composites was performed by using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (HELIOS NanoscaleLab 600i, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Three-point bending test was completed by Instron 5569 (Instron, Boston, MA, USA) universal electrical tensile testing machine, with a loading rate of 0.5 mm/min and a span of 30 mm. The dimensions of the samples were 3 mm × 4 mm × 36 mm. The thermal diffusion coefficient k of diamond/aluminum composite was measured by Netzsch LFA 467 Nanoflash instrument (Netzsch, GmbH, Selb, Germany) with the sample dimension of Φ12.7 mm × 3 mm. The thermal conductivity of the composites was determined by the formula λ = k·ρ·c, where ρ and c represent the density and specific heat capacity of the composite, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Nano-Hydroxyapatite Crystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase composition of the prepared nano-HAp crystals was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The morphology and size of the nano-HAp crystals were observed using an XL-type environmental scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) operated at 30 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Catalytic Transformation of Glass Beads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercial 2.0 mm borosilicate glass bead (Sigma Aldrich) was utilized as a support under DBD plasma condition. Then, various metal oxides were loaded on the spherical glass bead. The catalyst was prepared by following procedure32 (link). The glass beads were etched with 5 M NaOH (≥98%, Sigma Aldrich) solution at 100 °C, followed by immersing it in a suspension of metal oxide. Next, the mixture was dried at 19 120 °C for 1 h and washed with distilled water. The operation was repeated several times until the glass beads were no longer transparent with desired content of metal oxide. MnO (99%, Sigma Aldrich), Mn2O3 (99.9%, Sigma Aldrich), MnO2 (≥99%, Sigma Aldrich), Fe2O3 (≥99%, Sigma Aldrich), NiO (99%, Sigma Aldrich), and Co3O4 (99.5%, Sigma Aldrich) were used as metal oxides. Fixed amount (1 wt%) of metal oxides were loaded to each of the catalysts. 4.0 g of catalysts were used in the reaction. X-Ray Diffraction (RIGAKU SMARTLAB) with a Cu Kα radiation operated at 40 kV and 50 mA was utilized to verify the solid-state phases of the catalysts. In addition, the N2 adsorption/desorption method by an ASAP 2010 instrument (Micromeritics Co.) was employed in order to obtain the specific surface area of the catalysts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Crystalline Structure Analysis of Modified Starch Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Changes in the crystalline structure of modified starch films were determined using X-ray diffraction (Rigaku). A scan range of 2θ = 5°–50°, a step size of 0.05°, and a scan speed of 10°/min were used(Lian, Cao, Jiang, & Rogachev, 2021 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!