The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ds3 constant current isolated stimulator

Manufactured by Digitimer
Sourced in United Kingdom

The DS3 Constant Current Isolated Stimulator is a laboratory equipment designed to provide a constant current stimulus. It is capable of generating electrical pulses with adjustable parameters such as current intensity, pulse duration, and frequency.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using ds3 constant current isolated stimulator

1

Electrical Stimulation Setup for Larval Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Custom built electrical stimuli setup consisted of copper mesh electrodes that were mounted 6 cm apart on opposing sides and connected to a DS3 isolated constant current stimulator (Digitimer, Ltd.). Three electrical field stimulations (6mA, 20V, 500msec) were triggered every five minutes by MetaMorph (Molecular Devices). The larvae were paralyzed in 2% pancuranium bromide and mounted in the middle of 90mm diameter petri dishes filled with 30 ml E3 medium to ensure consistent stimulation. Shock assay was performed in 6–7 dpf agarose-restricted larvae, paralyzed with 2% pancuranium bromide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optogenetics and Electrical Stimulation of SCN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electrical stimulation of the SCN region (or where relevant optic nerve) was delivered via concentric stimulating electrodes (FHC SKU30202; 25 μm/125 μm inner/outer pole diameter) coupled to a DS3 Isolated Constant Current Stimulator (Digitimer) or STG4004 stimulus generator (MCS) for acute and long-term recordings respectively. In both cases, stimuli were 300 μA, 200μS dipolar pulses and were delivered with an interstimulus interval of 2 s (acute recording) or 60 s (long-term recordings). For experiments using optogenetic stimulation in most cases, stimuli were delivered via a 200 μm core, 0.66NA, fibre positioned ~ 200 μm above the slice surface. The fibre was coupled to a 465 nm PlexBright table top module (Plexon Inc.) and 10 ms light pulses (~ 800 mW/mm2 at fibre tip) were interleaved with electrical pulses as above (i.e. optogenetic stimuli occurred 1 s or 30s after electrical stimulation for acute and long-term recordings). In a subset of recordings (Fig. S3), optogenetic stimuli were delivered locally to one SCN hemisphere via a 105 μm core 0.66NA fibre resting on the slice surface (delivering ~ 600 mW/mm2 at fibre tip).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrical Stimulation Induces Ultrasonic Vocalizations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats implanted with stimulating electrodes were placed inside context B arena as described for the fear conditioning paradigm. Rats were allowed to explore the arena for 2 min, then stimulation (0.1 ms pulses, 100 Hz, 2 s) began at an intensity of 30 μA (DS3 isolated constant current stimulators, Digitimer Ltd.) and increased in 5 μA steps up to a maximum of 75 μA [39 (link)], with intervals of 3 min. Behavioural responses were recorded throughout the protocol using Freeze Frame software.
A M500-384 USB Ultrasound Microphone ultrasound detector positioned above the stimulation arena coupled to BatSound Touch Lite (Pettersson Elektronik) was used to record USVs. Recordings were sampled at 384 kHz, with a spectrogram window size of 512.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electrode Lesion and Brain Histology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following behavioural testing, rats implanted with recording or stimulating electrodes were anesthetised with gaseous isoflurane and intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (27.5 mg/kg) until hindpaw reflexes were absent. A current pulse of 100 µA for 2 s (DS3 isolated constant current stimulators, Digitimer Ltd.) was passed through the headstage to lesion electrode sites. Rats were then transcardially perfused with phosphate-buffered saline, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). The brains were extracted and left in 4% PFA for 24 h. Brains were then cut into 80 µm sections on a vibratome or freezing microtome, and these sections mounted onto glass slides. Sections were then stained with cresyl violet acetate, covered with DPX mounting medium and coverslipped. A Leica DMR upright bright-field microscope was used to image the lesion site. Location of the lesion site was projected onto a schematic of the PAG.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hippocampal eLFP Recording and Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evoked local field potentials (eLFP) were recorded in the stratum radiatum of the CA1 hippocampal region using glass micropipette electrodes filled with ACSF (resistance 1–2 MΩ) and an HEKA EPC 10 Patch Clamp Amplifier (HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht, Germany). The DS3 Constant Current Isolated Stimulator (Digitimer, Welwyn Garden, UK) and a bipolar stimulating electrode placed on the Schaffer’s collaterals at the hippocampal area CA2 were used for the induction of eLFPs. Current pulses 20–300 μA in amplitude and 200 μs in duration were applied to obtain reliable eLFPs. Single eLFPs were recorded continuously every 20 s. PatchMaster software (HEKA Electronik, Lambrecht, Germany) was used to record eLFPs, control the HEKA EPC 10 Patch Clamp Amplifier and the DS3 Constant Current Isolated Stimulator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation for SCI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCI rats were randomized into one of two treatment groups: repeated transcutaneous stimulation (SCI + tSCS group, n = 6) or no stimulation (SCI, n = 6). Starting 5 days post-injury, animals from the SCI + tSCS group were fitted with transcutaneous electrodes as described above (Section 2.1.1) and secured in a modified, custom-built apparatus to allow them to lie prone with hindlimbs hanging below at rest. The motor threshold (T) was evaluated visually and with light manual touch and was determined as the lowest intensity eliciting a twitch of the ankle. Stimulations were evoked using a DS3 constant current isolated stimulator (Digitimer Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK) and a customized script written in Signal (CED). The stimulation protocol consisted of single, monophasic pulses of 1 ms in duration delivered at 0.2 Hz. Stimulation intensity alternated in bouts of 3 min between suprathreshold (1.2 T) and subthreshold (0.8 T) for a total duration of 18 min per session. Untreated SCI animals were similarly secured to the apparatus for an equal amount of time but were not stimulated. Sessions were repeated 3 times a week for 4 weeks before the terminal experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Evoked Motor Potentials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were anesthetized with propofol (50–100 mg kg−1, intraperitoneally) and two 30-G stainless steel-stimulating electrodes were placed subcutaneously, overlying the left and right motor cortices. MEPs were elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation with a pulse duration of 1 ms at 8.5 mA, using a DS3 constant current isolated stimulator (Digitimer). Responses were recorded from the GCM using 30-G platinum transcutaneous needle electrodes (distance between recording electrodes ∼1 cm; Grass Technologies, Astro-Med). Recording electrodes were connected to an active headstage (3110W; Warner Instruments) and signal amplified (×100) using a DP-311 differential amplifier (Warner Instruments). The amplified signal was acquired by the PowerLab 8/30 data-acquisition system (ADInstruments) at a sampling frequency of 20 kHz, digitized and stored in a PC for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrical Shock Stimulation in Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A rectangle of stacked copper plates was brought into contact with the fly’s abdomen and legs using a manually movable stage (DT12XYZ/M, Thorlabs). The design of the copper plates was based on Felsenberg et al., 2018 (link). Shocks were provided by a DS3 Constant Current Isolated Stimulator (1.2 s, 32 mA, Digitimer; maximum voltage 90 V) and triggered by the same software as the odor delivery. Successful shock delivery was confirmed by observing the fly’s physical reaction with a Genie Nano-M1280 camera (Teledyne Dalsa) coupled to a 1x lens with working distance 67 mm (SE-16SM1, CCS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrical Stimulation of Fly Abdomen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A rectangle of stacked copper plates was brought into contact with the fly's abdomen using a manually movable stage (DT12XYZ/M, Thorlabs). The design of the copper plates was based on (Felsenberg et al., 2018) . Shocks were provided by a DS3
Constant Current Isolated Stimulator (1.2 s, 32 mA, Digitimer; maximum voltage 90 V) and triggered by the same software as the odor delivery. Successful shock delivery was confirmed by observing the fly's physical reaction with a Genie Nano-M1280 camera (Teledyne Dalsa) coupled to a 1x lens with working distance 67 mm (SE-16SM1, CCS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!