The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using kratos axis ultra

1

XPS Surface Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS was performed using a monochromatic Al Kα-source (Kratos Axis Ultra, Kratos Analytical). The size of the source beam was 2 mm × 2 mm, and the size of the analyzed region was 0.3 mm × 0.7 mm. The instrument was maintained at a pressure of 10−7 Pa during the experiments. The spectra were post processed with CasaXPS software to determine the change in composition of the sample surfaces.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Spectroscopic Characterization of Cathodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements were recorded using a PerkinElmer 100 FT-IR spectrometer. The spectra were averaged over 100 scans having a resolution of 2 cm−1 in the attenuated total reflectance mode. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were recorded on a delay-linked detector (DLD) (Kratos Axis-Ultra; Kratos Analytical Ltd.) with an Al Kα radiation source (1486.6 eV). A Hitachi S-4500 field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) instrument was used to obtain the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of respective cathodes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy of CNT-coated Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS on CNT-coated samples was carried out using the Kratos (Axis Ultra; Heywood, UK) system and was performed in an ultra-high vacuum environment (~10−9 Torr) with a monochromatized Al Kα (1486.6 eV) source. These acquired data were processed with Casa XPS software (Casa Software Ltd., Heywood, UK). Data analysis was carried out by using duplicate samples, selecting multiple spots in each sample, and optimizing the scan location for maximum output counts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

XPS Analysis of Nano-layer Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS (Kratos Axis Ultra, Kratos Analytical, Manchester UK) was conducted with survey scans at a pass energy of 160 eV, and high-resolution scans at a pass energy of 40 eV. Nano-layer adhesion to silica surface was imaged with SEM after rinsing silica bead (diameter ϕ=100 nm) dispersion (10 mg ml−1 in deionized water), spread on a silicon wafer coated with Z-Cat-C10, thoroughly with deionized water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Characterization of Material Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was operated with a JSM-7100F microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 10.0 kV. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning TEM (STEM) were operated at 100 kV by HT7700 (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to study crystal structures of materials with Cu–Kα radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA. The elemental composition and the electric structure were investigated by Kratos Axis Ultra photoelectron spectrometer (Kratos Analytical Inc., Manchester, UK) using mono Al Kα (1486.6 eV) X-rays. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured by Quadrasorb SI (Quantachrome Instrument, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The specific surface area and pore size distribution were obtained by using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method and the non-localized density functional theory (NLDFT) method, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

XPS Analysis of Catheter Reuse

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Room-temperature X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to examine the surface composition of catheters following 3 (n = 3) and 30 (n = 1) consecutive days of reuse. All experiments were performed at the nanoFAB Centre of the University of Alberta using an XPS imaging spectrometer (Kratos Axis Ultra, Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK). A detailed summary of XPS procedures is provided in Supplemental Appendix SC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of size 5 mm × 5 mm × 1 mm (longitudinal × width × thickness) were prepared. XPS measurements were performed on an XPS spectrometer (Kratos Axis Ultra, Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK). Spectral fitting and component analysis were performed using high-resolution spectra, and the number of components and their binding energy positions were obtained from previous studies [24 (link),25 (link)]. The XPS data were collected using a K-alpha XPS system with an aluminum Kα X-ray source. The base pressure in the analytical chamber was less than 5 × 10−7 Pa, and the survey scans’ spanning binding energies from 1200 to 0 eV were collected using a constant pass energy of 30 eV and a step interval of 0.050 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Milk Powder Surface Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were made using a Kratos AXIS Ultra spectrometer (Kratos Analytical Ltd., Manchester, UK) The relative amounts of protein, fat and lactose at the powder surface were determined using a matrix formula created from the elemental compositions of the pure milk components, according to the method described by Faldt, Bergenstahl, and Carlsson (1993) . It should be noted that after calculation the WPP tested in this study gave a slight negative surface fat value for all size fractions.
Considering that the fat content of the powder was negligible (~0.1%, w/w), the equations were adjusted to remove fat; fat content of WPP surfaces were considered to be "not determined".
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For material characterization, nitrogen sorption measurements were carried out using BELSORP-mini II-VS (MicrotracBEL Corp. Osaka, Japan). Before the measurement, samples were pre-treated at 200 °C under vacuum for 2 h. The specific surface area was calculated by a BET method using the adsorption area. The Barrett Joyner Hallenda (BJH) method was also applied to estimate the pore size distribution.
Thermogravimetric (TG) analyses were conducted using Thermo Plus Evo2 (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Measurements were carried out in the air from room temperature to 400 °C via raising the temperature by 4 °C/min.
SEM observations were performed using S-5200 (Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan), with the accelerating voltage of 30 kV. Studies with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were also conducted using Kratos Axis Ultra (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and RINT-UltimaIII/PSA (Rigaku), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of Electrodeposited Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystalline phase analysis of the electrodeposited films was performed by a PANalytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (1.5406 Å). The XRD patterns were analysed using the general structure analysis system (GSAS) to evaluate the structural features and phase composition of the films. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the films was carried out on a Shimadzu Kratos AXIS-ULTRA delay-line detector high-performance XPS system with monochromated Al Kα radiation. The shift of the binding energy scale due to charging was corrected by setting the C 1s peak at 284.5 eV. The core-level XPS spectra were deconvoluted using XPSPEAK software (version 4.1). Morphology of the films was examined by a Fei Inspect F50 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). Optical property was determined by measuring reflectance using a Perkin Elmer LAMBDA 1050 UV–Visible spectrophotometer (UV–Vis) equipped with a diffuse reflectance sphere (DRS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!