The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using clc dna workbench

1

PCR and Capillary Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primers were designed using Primer347 (link),48 (link). PCR was performed using GOTaq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) on DNA from peripheral blood and on cDNA from lymphoblastoid cells, using standard protocol. Capillary electrophoresis sequencing (ABI 3130 genetic analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was performed using the ABI BigDye terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following standard protocol. Data was analysed in CLC DNA Workbench (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PCR and Capillary Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primers were designed using Primer347 (link),48 (link). PCR was performed using GOTaq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) on DNA from peripheral blood and on cDNA from lymphoblastoid cells, using standard protocol. Capillary electrophoresis sequencing (ABI 3130 genetic analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was performed using the ABI BigDye terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), following standard protocol. Data was analysed in CLC DNA Workbench (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sanger Sequencing of 11q11 Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OR genes involved in the 11q11 deletion were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Genbank accession nos. AB065774, AB065775, and BK004390). Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer3 software and are available upon request (genome build GRCh37/hg19). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out under standard conditions followed by direct sequencing of the purified PCR product on an ABI Prism Genetic Analyzer 3130xl (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences were analyzed using CLC DNA workbench (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Genetic Manipulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast cells were transformed with the LiOAc/SS-DNA/PEG method 67 (link)68 (link). Yeast genomic DNA was extracted with
Phenol/Chloroform/Isoamyl-alcohol (25:24:1) 69 (link) and further purified with ethanol precipitation if required. PCR
was performed with high-fidelity polymerases Phusion and Q5 (New England
Biolabs) or ExTaq (Takara) and Taq (New England Biolabs) for diagnostic
purposes. Sanger sequencing 70 (link) was
performed by the VIB Genetic Service Facility (Antwerp). The sequences were
analyzed with Vector NTI (Invitrogen) or CLC DNA workbench (CLC Bio) software.
Lists of primers and plasmids are provided as supplementary tables S4 and S5,
respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Analysis of BGN Exons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger sequencing of the seven coding exons of BGN (RefSeq transcript
NM_001711.3) was performed. The PCR primer sequences and reaction conditions are
listed in Supplementary Table S1 online. PCR products were bidirectionally
sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems,
Carlsbad, CA) and separated on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied
Biosystems). Sequences were analyzed using CLC DNA workbench (CLC Bio, Aarhus,
Denmark). Microarray analysis was performed using the Illumina HumanCytoSNP12-V2.1
BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to standard protocols. Copy-number
variants (CNVs) were analyzed using CNV-WebStore.12 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Sanger Sequencing and Microarray Analysis of BGN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger sequencing of the seven coding exons of BGN (RefSeq transcript NM_001711.3) was performed. The PCR primer sequences and reaction conditions are listed in Table S1. PCR products were bidirectionally sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) and separated on an ABI 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). Sequences were analyzed using CLC DNA workbench (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Microarray analysis was performed using the Illumina HumanCytoSNP12-V2.1 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to standard protocols. Copy number variant (CNV) analysis was performed using CNV-webstore.12 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identifying LDLR Pathogenic Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted genomic DNA from 500 μL of peripheral blood using a TIANamp Blood DNA Midi Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). After performing genomic polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we sequenced the coding exons and their flanking intronic sequences of LDLR (GenBank NM_000527.4) for pathogenic mutations in the family members. The primers used in PCR have been described in an earlier report [13 ]. We screened for mutations in LDLR by direct sequencing. To verify the mutation, we separated heterozygous alleles by cloning the affected fragment into an EGFP-N1 vector. The fragment was amplified by PCR using forward primer 5′-TGAAATCTCGATGGAGTGGGTCCCATC-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CTGTAGCTAGACCAAAATCACCTATTTTTACTG-3′ and then cloned into EGFP-N1 vector. Plasmids were extracted from colonies and sequenced using the same primer. To confirm the novel mutation in LDLR, we also examined the mutation in the 100 unrelated controls. We performed the analysis of amino acid conservation around the mutation site using a CLC DNA Workbench (QIAGEN Bioinformatics, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Shark VEGF-Targeting Antibody Discovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A male Heterodontus francisci shark was immunized iv with 1 μg rhVEGF165 (Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), 300-01A) in 1× PBS every 15 days for 20 weeks. The dissection of the spleen, mRNA purification, and library generation were performed as described [48 (link)]. For the phage display, 3 rounds of panning were completed against 250 ng/well of rhVEGF165 with 5, 10, and 20 wash cycles with 1× PBS/0.5% Tween (PBST-0.5). Positive colonies were selected by PCR with the ompseq and gback primers [49 ]. Positive PCR clones were grown in LB medium (Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), L3022), and plasmids were isolated using commercial kits (Qiagen (Hilden, Germany), 27104). Their sequences were obtained by capillary electrophoresis (Seqxcel, San Diego, CA, USA), analyzed on a CLC DNA Workbench (Qiagen, version 121 7.9.0, Redwood, CA, USA), and compared with internal and external databases using NCBI BLAST.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Insect Identification in Fagus sylvatica Seeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For 56 out of 58 obtained seed lots, the seeds were X-rayed to reveal the presence of insects (Appendix S1: Table S1), as described by Roques and Skrzypczy nska (2003) . Two seed lots of Fagus sylvatica L. (SL 72 and SL 73) were not assessed for insects because of late delivery. Infested seeds were dissected with a dissecting knife, and insects were collected and individually stored in collection tubes with 95-99% ethanol. All larvae were examined using a microscope and were identified to order level. All seeds were also visually inspected for exit holes of insects.
Genomic DNA was extracted from individual insect specimens with DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A fragment of the mitochondrial gene (mtDNA) cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 (COI) was subsequently amplified by PCR in 25 lL reaction volumes containing 2 lL of DNA template, 0.2 lmol/L of each of the primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 (Folmer Sequences were assembled and edited with CLC DNA Workbench (Qiagen) and compared against reference sequences in the BOLDSYSTEMS (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007) and National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank databases (Geer et al. 2010) . The specimens' queries were matched to its best matching identified reference sequence for identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!