The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using desmin

1

Quantitative IHC Analysis of GFAP, Desmin, and Caspase-3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of all sections was done using the avidin–biotin–peroxidase method using the Bond‐Max fully automated immunostainer (Leica Biosystems, Deer Park, IL, USA) (Hsu et al., 1981 (link)). GFAP (ready‐to‐use primary antibody, mouse anti‐human, monoclonal antibody, PA0026; Leica Biosystems) and desmin (ready to use primary antibody, mouse anti‐human, monoclonal antibody, PA0032; Leica Biosystems) were used to stain the hippocampus and renal glomerular and interstitial myofibroblasts, respectively. The antibodies were added to each section. The quantification of the IHC was done for each slide (five microscopic fields for GFAP and 20 microscopic fields for desmin; magnification was 50 μm as present on scale, quantification was done in each microscopic field as a whole), using quantitative‐image analysis (Leica Microsystems). The quantification of desmin in the glomeruli and interstitium was done using quantitative‐image analysis (Leica Microsystems).
Similarly, quantification of apoptotic cells in hippocampus required the addition of an apoptotic marker Anti‐Caspase‐3 antibody, monoclonal antibody (ab184787) which was quantified in five microscopic fields (magnification was 50 μm as present on scale, quantification was done in each microscopic field as a whole) using the quantitative‐image analysis (Leica micro‐systems, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ASCL1 Expression in Rhabdomyosarcomas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were immunostained for desmin (Leica, Novocastra, Buffalo Grove, IL, clone DE-R-11, 1:50 – 1:100), myogenin (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, clone F5D, 1:25 – 1:50), MyoD1 (Ventana, Tucson, AZ, clone EP212, 1μg/mL), synaptophysin (Leica, Novocastra, Buffalo Grove, IL, clone 27G12, 1:100 – 1:200), chromogranin A (Ventana, Tucson, AZ, clone LK2H10, 1μg/mL), CD56 (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, clone 123C3, 1:50 – 1:100), TTF1 (Leica, Novocastra, Buffalo Grove, IL, clone SPT24, 1:200) and ASCL1 (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, Clone: 24B72D11.1, 1:100). Immunohistochemical results were dichotomized into cases with absent expression and those with positive expression, defined by staining noted in at least 5% of neoplastic cells. Immunophenotyping of all RMS was performed on representative whole slide sections.
ASCL1 expression in rhabdomyosarcomas was compared to 70 patients with HGNEC and 110 patients with typical urothelial carcinomas (UC) from specimens obtained from patients treated with radical cystectomy at our institution between 1987 and 2014 (18 (link)). Tissue microarrays, with four 1.0mm cores representing each HGNEC and typical UC, were immunostained for ASCL1 for this purpose. In addition, whole slide sections of 47 cases of non-urinary bladder rhabdomyosarcomas were immunostained for ASCL1, to assess specificity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunolabeling of Cochlear Pericytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cochleae or HEI‐OC1 cells were immediately harvested and fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 2 h or 15 min at room temperature. SV or the basilar membrane was dissected, blocked with donkey serum (8%), and treated with primary antibodies, anti‐desmin (1:200, Abcam) and anti‐F4/80 (1:200, eBioscience), anti‐CtBP2 (1:200, BD‐Biosciences), anti‐Myosin VIIa (1:200, Proteus Biosciences), anti‐Rab13 (1:200, Affinity) and secondary antibodies against rabbit or rat labeled with Alexa 488 or 594 (1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Isolectin GS‐IB4 conjugated to Alexa‐Fluor 647 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was applied for 1 h at room temperature. After mounting and capturing pictures by a laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica, SP8), the coverage of pericytes or PVM/Ms, which was displayed as desmin or F4/80 area/Isolectin area, was quantified by ImageJ.
5 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microscopic Examination of Sarcoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopic examination of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides was conducted in all cases. For a subset of cases, immunohistochemical stains for desmin (Leica, Buffalo Grove, IL), myogenin (Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA), H3K27me3 (EMD Millipore, Burlington, MA), alpha-1 antitrypsin (Roche Ventana), and p53 (Leica) were evaluated. Three cases were stained for periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) with diastase digestion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pluripotency and Lineage Marker Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.5% Tween-20 in PBS, and incubated to 0.1% Tween-20 with 10% horse serum. We exposed the cells to primary antibodies overnight and to secondary antibodies for 1 hour (Alexa Fluor, Invitrogen). We employed the following primary antibodies: SSEA-3 (1:100, R&D), SSEA-4 (1:500, DSHB), TRA1-60 (1:500, Chemicon), TRA1-81 (1:500, Chemicon), NANOG (1:500 Abcam), alpha-fetoprotein (1:500, DAKO), alpha-actinin (1:500 Sigma), alpha smooth muscle actin (1:500, Sigma), Desmin (1:100, Novocastra), TuJ1 (1:1000, Sigma), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, 1:1000, DAKO; 1:500, Sigma). Alkaline phosphatase staining was performed20 (link). For the analysis, we used a confocal LEICA LCS2 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Muscle Biopsy Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four patients received muscle biopsies. Muscle specimens were obtained from biceps in three patients, and from tibialis anterior in one patient. The muscle specimens were frozen in isopentane, and cooled in liquid nitrogen. Serial frozen sections were stained by routine histological and histochemical methods and by standard immunohistochemical techniques for dystrophin (N-terminus, C-terminus, and rod domain, Novocastra), sarcoglycan complex, (α-, β-, and γ-, Novocastra), dysferlin (Chemicon), and desmin (Novocastra).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Muscle Biopsy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed muscle biopsy for all of the patients. Serial frozen sections were stained by routine histological and histochemical methods and by immunohistochemical methods for dystrophin (N-terminus, C-terminus, and rod domain, Novocastra), sarcoglycan complex, (α-, β-, and γ-, Novocastra), dysferlin (Chemicon), and desmin (Novocastra).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Muscle Biopsy Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four patients received muscle biopsies. Muscle specimens were obtained from biceps in three patients, and from tibialis anterior in one patient. The muscle specimens were frozen in isopentane, cooled in liquid nitrogen. Serial frozen sections were stained by routine histological and histochemical methods and by standard immunohistochemical techniques for dystrophin (N-terminus, C-terminus, and rod domain, Novocastra), sarcoglycan complex, (α-, β-, and γ-, Novocastra), dysferlin (Chemicon), and desmin (Novocastra).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Muscle Biopsy and Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four patients received muscle biopsies. Muscle specimens were obtained from biceps in three patients, and from tibialis anterior in one patient. The muscle specimens were frozen in isopentane, and cooled in liquid nitrogen. Serial frozen sections were stained by routine histological and histochemical methods and by standard immunohistochemical techniques for dystrophin (N-terminus, C-terminus, and rod domain, Novocastra), sarcoglycan complex, (α-, β-, and γ-, Novocastra), dysferlin (Chemicon), and desmin (Novocastra).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!