The patient was placed in an open-leg position. The operator stood on the right side of the patient, the first assistant stood on the left side, and the laparoscopist stood between the patient’s legs. After carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum of 8-10 mmHg had been established though the umbilical port, four operating ports were placed in the upper abdomen. A flexible laparoscope was then introduced via the umbilical port; a three-dimensional laparoscopic system was employed (Endoeye Flex 3D, EVIS EXERA III; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). During LTG, dissection of the LNs was D1 plus dissection, as defined by the Japan Gastric Cancer Treatment Guideline, 4th ed., in 2014 [15 ]. In our institution, a total of twelve surgeons performed this surgery, under two supervisors. Hence, our surgical procedures were performed in a unified way.
Endoeye flex 3d
Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan
The Endoeye Flex 3D is a compact and lightweight video endoscope system designed for minimally invasive medical procedures. It features a flexible, steerable tip and a high-resolution 3D imaging capability. The core function of the Endoeye Flex 3D is to provide healthcare professionals with a tool for visualizing and examining internal body structures during various diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
3 protocols using endoeye flex 3d
1
Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Procedure
2
Standardized Simulation of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The interventions in both trials were the same. In both trials, an identical standardized patient setting was simulated, using inanimate artificial, biotissue, organs (LifeLike BioTissue, Ontario, Canada) as previously published by King et al. [7 ]. The specifics on the simulation set-up and biotissue were previously published in the LAELAPS-3D2D [13 (link)] and LAEBOT-3D2D [24 (link)] trials.
For robotic surgery, the integrated 3D HD da Vinci robotic laparoscope and robotic system was used (Intuitive, Sunnyvale California, USA). For laparoscopy, the ENDOEYE FLEX 3D (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) 10-mm articulating laparoscope with high-definition vision was used. Participants first watched an instruction video and had an oral instruction before the start of the experiment. Hereafter, participants were allocated to complete a PJ and a HJ twice in the biotissue model, once with 3D- and once with 2D-vision. The anastomosis techniques and type and number of sutures were standardized, as means to compare the groups in this pooled analysis. Resolution (high-definition/1280 × 1024) and lighting conditions were identical between both interventions and approaches.
For robotic surgery, the integrated 3D HD da Vinci robotic laparoscope and robotic system was used (Intuitive, Sunnyvale California, USA). For laparoscopy, the ENDOEYE FLEX 3D (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) 10-mm articulating laparoscope with high-definition vision was used. Participants first watched an instruction video and had an oral instruction before the start of the experiment. Hereafter, participants were allocated to complete a PJ and a HJ twice in the biotissue model, once with 3D- and once with 2D-vision. The anastomosis techniques and type and number of sutures were standardized, as means to compare the groups in this pooled analysis. Resolution (high-definition/1280 × 1024) and lighting conditions were identical between both interventions and approaches.
3
Laparoscopic Gauze Retrieval Protocol
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All operations were performed using the same model of the laparoscopic device, including the imaging system (IMH-20, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and the laparoscope (Endoeye Flex 3D, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), to equalize surgical settings, such as recording quality, light source, and operation view. The videos were recorded at a resolution of 1920 × 1080 pixels at 60 frames per second.
The surgical gauze was the same product (DaeHan Medical Supply Corporation, Chungju-si, Republic of Korea) of 10 cm × 7.5 cm × 4P, with an average weight of 1.438 g (± 0.01 g).
The digital scale was an Electronic Scale (14,192-641C, IT Caster Ltd., Wan Chai, Hong Kong) with an error range of 0.01 g.
The gauzes were from the abdominal cavity through the laparoscopic 12 mm-sized trocars (Kii® Optical Access System, Applied Medical Resources Corporation, California, USA) or multi-channel glove port (UP04FLV2-B, UNI-PORT, Dalim Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea).
The surgical gauze was the same product (DaeHan Medical Supply Corporation, Chungju-si, Republic of Korea) of 10 cm × 7.5 cm × 4P, with an average weight of 1.438 g (± 0.01 g).
The digital scale was an Electronic Scale (14,192-641C, IT Caster Ltd., Wan Chai, Hong Kong) with an error range of 0.01 g.
The gauzes were from the abdominal cavity through the laparoscopic 12 mm-sized trocars (Kii® Optical Access System, Applied Medical Resources Corporation, California, USA) or multi-channel glove port (UP04FLV2-B, UNI-PORT, Dalim Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!