The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultravision lp large volume detection system hrp polymer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

The UltraVision LP Large Volume Detection System HRP polymer is a laboratory equipment product designed for use in immunohistochemistry (IHC) applications. It provides a detection system for the visualization of target antigens in tissue samples. The product functions as a polymer-based detection system that utilizes horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as the reporter enzyme.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using ultravision lp large volume detection system hrp polymer

1

Quantification of Immune Markers in Bone Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient bone biopsies were fixed in formalin at 10%. Once fixed, the samples were embedded in paraffin, so as to allow the cut to the microtome thin sections (3–6 μm). Bone biopsy sections were incubated with polyclonal rabbit Abs against CD38 (1:1.500) (code n. HPA022132, Sigma, Saint Louis, MO) or CD39 (1:70) (code n. 14211-1-AP, Proteintech, Manchester, UK), CD73 (1:1.000), CD31 (1:50), for 60 min at room temperature. Antibodies anti-CD31, CD73 and CD203a were produced in the Lab of one of the authors (FM). The staining was visualized using the UltraVision LP Large Volume Detection System HRP polymer (Thermo Scientific, Erembodegem, Belgium) according to the manifacture's specifications. A sample was considered positive if the target antigen was detected at least in the 50% of cells. Images were captured by DP22 digital camera (Olympus; Hamburg, Germany) and analyzed with the OLYMPUS Stream software, adjusting tone and contrast to ensure the best image quality.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Analysis of Colonic Damage in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The middle sections of the distal colons of each rat were fixed in 4% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) and embedded in paraffin, and 3 μm sections were obtained. The slides were stained with H&E or AB. To estimate colonic damage, the slides stained with H&E were observed by a phase contrast microscope (LEICA ICC50, Wetzlar, Germany) and scored according to the parameters shown in Supplementary Table S145 (link). Goblet cells in crypts were counted with the AB-stained specimens. For IHC, the antigen was retrieved using Tris-EDTA buffer (pH 9.0) and the detection procedure was performed using an UltraVision LP Large Volume Detection System: HRP Polymer (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primary antibody against MUC2 (sc-7314, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) was used, and the images obtained from the phase contrast microscope (LEICA ICC50) were analysed with ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spinophilin Localization in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For measuring the localization and distribution of the spinophilin protein in BC tissue, we included eight formalin-fixed paraffin embedded BC cases from the Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria. The ethics committees of the Medical University of Graz approved this study (No. 24-248 ex 11/12). Immunohistochemical analysis for spinophilin expression was performed on whole tissue slides of BC tissue. In detail, the 3μm thick sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated with graded ethanol. For spinophilin detection, the sections were subjected to antigen retrieval in a pressure cooker (Dako, Pascal) in 0.01 M sodium-citrate buffer, pH 6.0, and subsequently incubated for 60 minutes with a rabbit antibody to human spinophilin (Millipore, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA; Anti-Spinophilin Antibody: AB5669) at a 1:50 dilution. The reaction was visualized using the UltraVision LP Large Volume Detection System HRP Polymer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) and all sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. For the negative control, the primary antibody was omitted. The localization and distribution of spinophilin-staining were evaluated by an experienced pathologist (A.A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological Analysis of Skin Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dorsal skins were fixed with 10% formalin immediately after collection, gradually dehydrated in 80%, 90% and 100% ethanol and cleaned with xylene. Next, the tissues were embedded in paraffin, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was carried out. Masson’s trichrome staining was performed for the detection of collagen fibers in the skin tissue. The paraffin-embedded tissues were placed in a 5% iron alum solution for 30 min at 56 °C and then stained with Weigert iron hematoxylin and Biebrich scarlet acid fuchsin solution. After the first stain, the slides were placed in a phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid solution and then stained with aniline blue solution. The stained slides were observed using a light microscope (Leica DM750, Wetzlar, Germany) to detect collagen fibers and nuclei. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to analyze LAMP-1 and collagen-1 using a UltraVision LP large volume detection system HRP polymer (TL-060-HL, Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. LAMP-1/CD107a antibody (1:500, NB120-19294, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA) and collagen-1 antibody (1:500, NB600-408, Novus Biologicals) were used as primary antibodies and goat antirabbit IgG secondary antibody (HRP (horseradish peroxidase)) (1:1000, HAF008, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used as the secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Analysis of FFPE Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) sections were deparaffinized in an incubator at 65°C for 40–60 minutes followed by incubation in xylene (5 min +10 min, twice) and xylene-EtOH mixture (1∶1) for another 5 min. Sections were rehydrated by incubation in decreasing alcohol concentrations. Microwave treatment at 90W for 20 min in 10% target retrieval solution pH 6 (Dako Österreich GmbH) was followed by endogenous peroxidase blocking through incubation in 3% H2O2 for 10 min. To reduce unspecific antibody binding, blocking with serum-free protein block (Dako Österreich GmbH) was performed for 30 min. Sections were incubated with anti-proteolipid protein (PLP) antibody (1 µg/ml) (Chemicon (Millipore)) and isotype control (1 µg/ml) overnight (+4°C). Sections were subsequently incubated with a secondary antibody anti-IgY (host rabbit) (Abcam) for 1 hour and reactivity was visualized with UltraVision LP large-volume detection system HRP polymer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Freemont, CA, www.labvision.com) and stained with Dako REAL DAB+ Chromogen (Dako Österreich GmbH) for 1 min following the manufacturer's instructions. Stained sections were counterstained with Harriś Hematoxylin solution (Merck) for 20 seconds, blued in hot tap water and mounted with mounting medium (Tissue Tek, Coverslipping Resin, Sakura Finetek USA Inc, Torrance, CA; www.sakuraus.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!