The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spme vial

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

SPME vials are specialized containers designed for solid-phase microextraction (SPME) techniques. They provide a controlled environment for the adsorption and desorption of analytes during the SPME process. The vials are constructed to ensure consistent and reliable sample preparation for subsequent analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using spme vial

1

Volatile Analysis of Spiked Wine Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GCMS) was used to analyse the volatile constituents of the wines produced from the fermentation of the spiked MGJM mixtures. Aliquots of the wines (5 mL) were diluted 1 in 2 with H2O to a final volume of 10 mL before analysis. In all cases, NaCl (3 g) was added to each SPME vial (amber 20 mL, Supelco) prior to sample addition. Samples were spiked prior to analysis with 10 µL of a solution containing the following deuterated internal standards at the specified concentrations: d13-hexanol (920 mg/L); d11-hexanoic acid (930 mg/L); d16-octanal (82.1 mg/L); d5-ethyl nonanoate (9.2 mg/L), d3-linalool (1.73 mg/L). SPME-GCMS was carried out using an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a GerstelMP2 auto-sampler and using an Agilent Technologies 5975C mass spectrometer for detection of m/z and compound identification. SPME and chromatography conditions and compound identification were carried out as reported by Dennis et al. [8 (link)]. Quantification of the analytes was achieved by linear 5-point external calibrations (r2 = 0.97–0.99). Standard compounds were added to model wine (12% aqueous ethanol, pH adjusted to 3.2 with potassium bitartrate) at five different concentrations, and further preparation of the SPME vials was analogous to the above procedure for samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Headspace SPME Extraction of Pepper Volatiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) method was employed to extract the volatile compounds from the minced pepper samples. The volatile components were analyzed according to the methods previously described (2 (link)). Samples (30 g each) were blended with 30 ml of distilled water, and 2 g of the sample was immediately transferred into a 15 ml SPME vial (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) followed by addition of 50 μL 2-octanol (10–6 mol/L) in methanol as an internal standard. After sample preparation, each vial was placed in a water bath at 70°C for 15 min with agitation to reach an equilibrium state. Subsequently, a fiber coated with 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was injected into the vial for 30 min to absorb volatile compounds.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Headspace SPME Extraction of Bacterial VOCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A new 75 mm CAR/PDMS SPME fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was conditioned with helium at 270 °C for 2 h prior to use. After each extraction cycle, the fiber was returned to the SPME needle to prevent contamination and conditioned again with helium at 270 °C for 20 min. Extractions were performed in 15 mL Supelco SPME vials filled with 9 mL bacterial culture containing a stir bar. The vials were clamped inside a thermostatic water bath placed on a hot stirrer. The SPME needle was allowed to pierce the septum and the fiber was exposed to the headspace of the vial for 90 min at 60 °C with constant magnetic stirring. The VOCs from 9 mL KMB broth were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Volatile Compound Analysis by SPME-GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volatile compound analysis was performed by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC MS-QP2010, Shimadzu, Japan). Samples of 2 mL were placed into SPME vials (Supelco, USA) and kept in a water bath at 60 °C for 15 min to stabilize the volatile compounds in the head space of the vials. An SPME fiber assembly (75 μm, Carboxen/Polydimethylsiloxane) was then immersed into the head space of each vial, which was left at 60 °C for 30 min, allowing the volatile compounds to be collected by the fiber assembly. At the end of this period, the SPME fiber assembly was injected into the GC MS. A Restek Rx-5Sil MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm; Restek Corporation, USA) was used with helium (1.61 mL/min) as the carrier gas and the furnace program's initial temperature was 2 min at 40 °C with a final temperature of 250 °C for 5 min. The Wiley, NIST, Tutor, and FFNSC libraries were used to identify volatile compounds (Güneşer et al., 2015 (link); Tu, Tang, Azi, Hu, & Dong, 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microbial Volatile Organic Compound Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VOCs were collected using a SAAB-57318 (75 μm CAR/PDMS) SPME. A new SPME fiber was preconditioned with helium at 270 °C for 2 h before use. Extractions were performed in 15 mL Supelco SPME vials filled with 7 mL bacterial fermentation (OD = 1.0–1.2 A) containing a stirring rod. A thermostatic magnetic stirrer was placed on top of the vials. The SPME needle pierced the septum, and the fiber was exposed to the headspace of the vial for 120 min at 60 °C with constant magnetic stirring. Analysis of microbial VOCs was conducted via GC-MS.
VOCs produced via the representative isolates were detected using a 7890 GC/5975 MSD gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) [23 (link),24 (link),25 (link)]. Identification of compounds was carried out via comparison of retention times and mass spectral data. Relative content was determined from the standard chart (spectrogram database NIST111L). Each data is the mean of three replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Chlorinated Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Trichloroacetic acid (TCA; CAS No. 76-03-9; ≥99%pure), chloroform, isopropanol and ethanol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dichloroacetic acid (DCA; CAS No.79-43-6; ≥98.0% pure), trichloroethanol (TCEOH; CAS No.115-20-8), methyl chloroformate (MCF; CAS No. 79-22-1), pyridine (CAS No. 110-86-1), methanol, and NaCl were procured from Merck Chemicals (Darmstandt, Germany). Trizol reagent was purchased from Invitrogen Bioservices India Pvt. Ltd. (Bangalore, India). Material related to solid-phase microextraction (SPME), such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fiber of 100 μm film thickness, SPME vials, septa, holder and heating block were supplied by Supelco (Bellefonte, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!