The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

45 protocols using metalyzer 3b

1

Incremental Exercise Test for VO2max Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On their first visit to the laboratory, the subjects' O 2max was measured with an incremental exercise test to exhaustion, performed on a cycle ergometer (Monark Weight Ergometer 814E, Varberg, Sweden). The increments were set at 15-20 W per minute according to the expected physical fitness so as to reach exhaustion within 12 minutes as recommended [12] (link).
Complete metabolic data were collected using a breath-by-breath ergospirometry system (Metalyzer ® 3B, Cortex Biophysik GmbH, Germany). They had a O 2max of 47.1 ± 7.4 ml.min -1 .kg -1 .
During the four experimental sessions, heart rate (PolarVantage, Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland), oxygen consumption and respiratory exchange ratio (RER) (Metalyzer ® 3B, Cortex Biophysik GmbH, Germany) were assessed regularly (Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Metrics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolic data were collected breath by breath via a gas analyser (MetaLyzer 3B; Cortex Biophysik, Germany), throughout the CPET and during recovery. Prior to testing, the equipment was calibrated following the manufacturer's instructions. MetaSoft Studio © software (version 5.13.0 SR2) was used to filter data using a 20 s moving time interval average (Robergs et al. 2010 (link)). Thus, the highest average oxygen uptake over 30 s was considered the peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 peak). VT1 and VT2 were determined independently by two experienced CPET clinicians using standardize guidelines that have been shown to have high reliability (Franssen et al. 2022) (link). Criteria for maximum effort included a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) of ≥ 1.10 and a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) above 18 (Liguori et al. 2022; Robergs et al. 2010) (link). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure were measured manually at rest before the test, every 2 min during the test, immediately afterward, and during the 5 min recovery phase of CPET. RPE was assessed using the Borg 6-20 scale at each 1 min through the incremental phase and at the end of the test (Borg 1982) . Participants were familiarized with the Borg scale prior to testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CRF was determined by the maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max in ml.kg -1 min -1 ) which was obtained from maximal exercise testing. The mode of measurement was a bike ergometer (Lode, The Netherlands) along with a breath-by-breath analysis (Metalyzer 3B, CORTEX Biophysik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). An individualized test protocol was used to assess CRF. The test in most cases was initiated at 30 Watt (W) and at a speed of 60 revolutions a minute (rpm). The patients were asked to maintain a speed of between 60 and 80 rpm during the test. The Wattage was increased by 1 W every 6 s. The aim of the test was to achieve exhaustion within 8-12 min. Before exercise testing, the patients were required to do a familiarisation session. If the patient was not expected to reach 8 min with the exercise protocol, the resistance was first set at 10 W. In contrast, patients who were expected to go beyond 12 min had a work rate increment of 2 W every 6 s. The test was terminated when the participant could no longer maintain a pedal rate of 60 rpm after being encouraged. Blood pressure and electrocardiogram (ECG) during exercise testing were recorded and checked by a medical doctor during the test constantly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Indirect Calorimetry during Sub-Maximal Exercise

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-time breath-by-breath gaseous exchange data (Metalyzer 3B, Cortex Biophysik, Leipzig, Germany) of V ̇O2 (L.min -1 ), V ̇CO2 (L.min -1 ) and RER were recorded during all exercise tests. Consequently, indirect calorimetry was used to calculate EE (kJ.min -1 ) and substrate oxidation rates (g.min -1 ) using stoichiometric equations, assuming negligible protein oxidation, specifically developed for exercise intensities between 40-50% V ̇O2peak, as shown below (Jeukendrup & Wallis, 2005) (link).
Exported data was analysed only from the final 50 minutes of all one-hour sub-maximal tests to ensure participants reached steady-state. Data was averaged for every 15 second period during the entire 50 minutes of exercise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cardiorespiratory Fitness Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CRF, as an outcome of change in cardiorespiratory fitness, was determined by the maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max in ml.kg -1 min -1 ) which was obtained from a maximal exercise test. Another objective measure that was evaluated during the CRF test included the work rate (Watt). The mode of measurement for CRF was a bike ergometer (Lode, The Netherlands) together with a calibrated breath-by-breath system (Metalyzer 3B, CORTEX Biophysik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). An individualised test protocol that was based on the guidelines of the American Heart Association [25] (link) was used for the assessment of CRF. If the patient was not expected to reach 150 Watts (W) resistance, the resistance was first set at ten W and gradually increased by one W every 6 s. In contrast, patients who were expected to reach about 150 W started at 30 W and the resistance was increased by two W every 6 s. The test was terminated when the patients could no longer maintain a pedal rate of 60 revolutions per minute. The occurrence of side effects from CRF testing was avoided by the monitoring of the BP, HR and electrocardiogram (ECG) [20] (link) -if the BP, HR or ECG was abnormal, patients were referred to the cardiologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Graded Cycling Exercise Test Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, a standardized warm-up of 10 min at 100 W was performed; the ramp protocol consisted of increments of 30 W · min-3 until volitional exhaustion [13 (link)]. The end of the test was considered when the participant was unable to maintain the power output of each final completed stage. During GXT participants were monitored through a gas exchange measurement system/device with breath-by-breath technology and calibrated before each test (Metalyzer 3b, CORTEX Biophysik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany). Each participant used their own bike mounted on a smart training device (Bkool, model Bkool one; Madrid, Spain). The protocol was completed with a PowerTap P1 (PP1), which produced reliable output power readings of 100–500 W, in a seated position (rho ≥ 0.987), and an absolute reliability index (150–500 W; COV = 2.3%; SEM < 1.0 W) [18 ]. The PowerTap during cardiopulmonary tests are more ecologically valid, allowing cyclists to use their own bicycles [18 ]. HR was collected via a HR monitor (HRM-Tri; Garmin Ltd., Olathe, KS, USA). The smart trainer assessed power with internal sensors that were paired to a smartwatch for future analysis (Forerunner 735xt, Garmin, Olathe, KS, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Validating Polar H10 Heart Rate Sensor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polar H10 was used as the criterion device. The HR sensor was attached to a Polar Pro heart rate strap placed over the sternum. Polar H10 live data were transmitted to a spiroergometry system (METALYZER 3B, CORTEX Biophysik GmbH), which recorded HR data at 1-second intervals. Polar H10 has previously been found to be valid when compared with ECG, with a correlation of r=0.997 [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Respiratory Parameters During Gaming

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Respiratory parameters [oxygen uptake ( V· O2), carbon dioxide output ( V· CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and ventilation (VE)] were monitored continuously (METALYZER® 3B, CORTEX Biophysik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) in sitting position starting 10 min before, over the entire course of the game, and until 10 min thereafter. The spirometry data were obtained breath-by-breath and were analyzed for every 5 s. Data were calculated as 5-min intervals and as 0.5-, 1-, and 2-min intervals after the start of the gaming session. When referring to these data, index entries, therefore, contain either “pre,” the minutes in the game (e.g., RERmin2), “post” or the number of minutes after the end of the game (e.g., RERmin+10). EE was calculated by converting the measured RER values to their caloric equivalent and multiplying this by the corresponding V· O2 values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Treadmill Ramp Test for V̇max and V̇O2peak

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess Vmax and VO2peak, a ramp test was performed on a treadmill with a starting inclination of 1%, to reflect the energetic cost of outdoor running [27 (link)]. After a 2 min warmup at 2.4 m·s− 1, the test started at 2.4 m·s− 1 and increased by 0.2 m·s− 1 every minute. If participants reached 5.2 m·s− 1, the incline was increased by 1° for each increment. Spirometric data was recorded breath by breath and interpolated for values for each second (Metalyzer® 3B; Cortex Biophysik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany), while heart rate (Polar H7 Sensor; Polar Electro, Kempele, Finland) was recorded every second. The spirometer was calibrated weekly with a reference gas (5% CO2 and 15% O2) and before each test with ambient laboratory air and with a 3-l syringe according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Participants were verbally encouraged to reach voluntary exhaustion. Vmax was defined as the highest increment completed, while for additional degrees of inclination 0.2 m·s− 1 was counted. VO2peak was defined as the highest 30-s moving average oxygen uptake.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Assessing Body Composition and CRF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition was estimated by a dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan using a Hologic Delfia W 4500 (Hologic, Bedford, USA). CRF was assessed by a maximal treadmill test. The Bruce protocol was chosen so as to challenge even the fittest people in our heterogeneous group, which spanned a wide spectrum of lifestyles, from fairly sedentary to very active people. The volunteer wore an air-tight mask (Hans Rudolph Inc., MO, USA), which had a gas sensor (Metalyzer 3B, Cortex Biophysik GmbH, Germany) attached to it, while heart rate was monitored using a Polar Electro T61 chest heart rate monitor (Polar Inc., Lake Success, NY, USA). The participant was asked to run on a treadmill (Woodway, GmbH, Germany) until exhaustion, unless they experienced chest pain or felt unwell. VO2max was taken to be the final steady-state value for oxygen consumption. The Foster [25] (link) and Pollack [26] (link) equations, which are functions of the time spent on the treadmill under the Bruce protocol, were used for men and women respectively, to estimate CRF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!