The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Biocoat matrigel invasion chamber

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, China, Spain, Italy, Canada

The BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers are a laboratory equipment used to assess the invasive potential of cells. The chambers are pre-coated with Matrigel basement membrane matrix, which acts as a barrier to mimic the extracellular matrix. Researchers can use these chambers to study the ability of cells to invade through this barrier.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

877 protocols using biocoat matrigel invasion chamber

1

Matrigel Invasion Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion across a basement membrane was performed using BD BioCoat™ Matrigel™ Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a total of 105 cells were placed in the upper compartment of the invasion chamber (BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber, BD Biosciences) for 24 h at 37 °C. Non-invading cells were removed with a swab and the filters were then fixed in methanol and stained with crystal violet. Quantification of the invasion assay was performed by spectrophotometry after resuspension of the stain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Invasion Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion potential of ovarian cancer cells treated with recMFAP5 was evaluated using a Matrigel invasion assay with a BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 3×104 A224 or ALST cells were seeded onto an 8 µm BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber in serum-free medium and inserted into a BD Falcon TC companion plate with or without 200 ng mL−1 recMFAP5. The cells were incubated in a humidified tissue culture incubator at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 15 hours. Cells were then stained with calcein AM, and non-invading cells were removed from the upper surface of the invasion chambers. Counting of the invaded cells was facilitated by photographing the membrane under a fluorescent microscope, and the numbers of invaded cells were analyzed using the Image-Pro Plus 7.0 software program (Media Cybernetics Inc., Rockville, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Matrigel Invasion Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion across a basement membrane was performed using BD BioCoat™ Matrigel™ Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a total of 105 cells were placed in the upper compartment of the invasion chamber (BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber, BD Biosciences) for 24 h at 37 °C. Non-invading cells were removed with a swab and the filters were then fixed in methanol and stained with crystal violet. Quantification of the invasion assay was performed by spectrophotometry after resuspension of the stain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Invasion Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion potential of ovarian cancer cells treated with recMFAP5 was evaluated using a Matrigel invasion assay with a BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 3×104 A224 or ALST cells were seeded onto an 8 µm BD BioCoat Matrigel invasion chamber in serum-free medium and inserted into a BD Falcon TC companion plate with or without 200 ng mL−1 recMFAP5. The cells were incubated in a humidified tissue culture incubator at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 15 hours. Cells were then stained with calcein AM, and non-invading cells were removed from the upper surface of the invasion chambers. Counting of the invaded cells was facilitated by photographing the membrane under a fluorescent microscope, and the numbers of invaded cells were analyzed using the Image-Pro Plus 7.0 software program (Media Cybernetics Inc., Rockville, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transwell Assays for Cell Invasion and Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed cell transwell invasion and migration assays using 24‐well BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (8 μm pore size; BD Biosciences, SanJose, CA, USA). 1 × 105 serum starvation OS cells were re‐suspended in 200 μL serum‐free medium and added to the upper wells of BD BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers for invasion (with matrigel basement membrane matrix over the PET membrane) and migration (without matrigel basement membrane matrix). MEM (400 μL) containing 10% FBS was filled into the bottom chambers. After 24 hours of incubation, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 15 minutes. And then, the nonmigrated cells were wiped off from the surface of PET membrane with swab, the cells that migrate through the pores will be counted under the microscope and photographed in ten randomly selected fields. All the assays were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Endometrial Cancer Cell Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ARF6, NEDD9, and MT1-MMP knocked down HEC-1B and Ishikawa cells and their scrambled siRNA transfected cells were used to assess the effects of knockdown of these proteins on the invasive property of endometrial cancer cells. The Biocoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) were rehydrated at 37°C for 2 h. Control and knockdown cells were detached by trypsin and resuspended in serum-free medium. Medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum was applied to the lower chambers of BD Biocoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers as chemoattractant and then cells were seeded on the upper chambers at a density of 2.5 × 104 cells/well in 100 ml of serum-free medium. The chambers were incubated for 16–18 h at 37°C. At 18 h after plating, noninvading cells were removed from the upper surface of the membrane by scrubbing. The cells on the lower surface of the membrane were fixed for 2 min in 100% methanol and stained with 1% toluidine blue in 1% sodium borate for 2 min. Cells that invaded through the insert were counted in five random fields per slide. All slides were coded to avoid biased counting. The assay was run in triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Matrigel Invasion Assay for Cell Motility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell invasion was assessed using the Biocoat matrigel invasion chambers with 8 micron pores (BD, Biocoat matrigel invasion chambers, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). 2.5×105 cells resuspended in OptiMEM without FBS were seeded into the matrigel coated 6-well inserts. OptiMEM plus 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After 48 hours, non invading cells located in the upper side of the chamber were wiped off using cotton swabs. Invaded cells were fixed in 100% methanol and stained with tolouidine blue. Invasion was measured by counting the number of cells in 10 microscopic fields (magnification 20X) and results are expressed as fold change of invasive cell subpopulation respect to proliferative one, which was set as 1 for definition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cell Invasion Using Matrigel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BioCoatMatrigel Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences-Discovery Labware, Inc Bedford, MA) was used to measure cell invasion according to manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, A549 cells were stimulated with chronic CSE alone or in combination with GSK343 as described above. After 14 days of stimulation, cells were allowed to invade for 22 hours toward 5% FBS. The cells on the upper surface of the matrigel were removed, fixed with methanol and the membranes stained with Diff quick, and the cells adherent to the outer surface of membrane evaluated, counting at least six fields per filter in each group at 40X magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Matrigel Invasion Assay for Myxoid Liposarcoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Invasion assays were performed using the Biocoat Matrigel invasion chamber (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) as described previously (Harimaya et al, 2000 (link)). Myxoid liposarcoma cell lines (1.0 × 105 per well) were suspended in 100 μl serum-free RPMI and seeded in the Matrigel-coated upper chambers. The lower chambers were placed in 600 μl serum-free RPMI containing CM or the indicated growth factors and antibodies. The indicated inhibitors were added to both upper and lower chambers. After 24-h incubation, the filters were fixed and the number of cells was determined as described for the transwell migration assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell migration assays were conducted with transfected cell lines using uncoated Transwell inserts (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA).
Cell invasion assays were conducted with transfected cell lines using a 24-well Biocoat Matrigel invasion chamber (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocol and the methods described previously 21 (link), 22 (link).
1×104 transfected cells were seeded into the upper chamber in serum-free media. The outer wells were filled with media containing 10% FBS. The cells were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h (migration assay) or 36 h (invasion assay), and then nonmigrating or noninvading cells were removed by wiping the chamber surface with a cotton swab. Cells that had migrated or invaded through the filter and adhered to its lower surface were fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The number of migrating or invading cells on the membrane was counted in five microscopic fields (×400). The results are expressed as the mean number of cells per field. Each assay was conducted in quadruplicate and repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!