The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using filgrastim

1

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Hematopoietic stem cells mobilization is induced in the donors using subcutaneous administration of 5 to 10 µg/kg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim, Amgen) for 4 consecutive days. Then, peripheral blood stem cells were harvested using apheresis Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Lakewood). The CD3+ cells (FITC-conjugated human anti-CD3, Beckman Coulter) and CD34+ cells (PE-conjugated human anti-CD34, EXBIO) were counted by flow cytometry (Attune NxT, Invitrogen). All patients received 5×108 and 2-4 ×1066mononuclear cells and CD34+ cells/kg, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mobilizing Stem Cells for Transplantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
8-week old, female C57BL/6J mice were divided into seven groups (n = 3 per group). Mice from each group received G-CSF (Neupogen, Filgrastim, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) intra-peritoneal injections (125 μg/kg) every 12 hr for 4 consecutive days to mobilize resident HSCs prior to transplantation. AMD3100 (Mozobil, Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA) was administered (5 mg/kg) through subcutaneous injection 14 hr after the last dose of G-CSF and 1 hr prior to HSC transplantation. 8-week old GFP+ lineage-negative donor cells (2.0 × 106) were transplanted into each G-CSF/AMD3100-treated mouse via tail vein injection. This procedure was repeated once every 2 weeks for a number of cycles corresponding to individual group numbers (i.e., group 1 received one transplant, group 2 received two transplant cycles, and so on, with group 7 receiving seven transplant cycles). HSC transplant efficacy was assessed by determination of percentage of GFP-positive cells in peripheral blood by flow cytometry at 1 and 4 months after the last transplantation cycle. Data represent mean ± SD from three animals per different cycle of HSCT group (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Expansion and Drug Treatment of BP CML Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood (PB) samples were obtained with appropriate consent and IRB approval from patients with CML at the University of California, Irvine (S. T. Ong, #IRB 01–59) and patients seen at the Singapore General Hospital (under SingHealth IRB approved protocols). Patient diagnosis and clinical responses are listed in the electronic supplementary material, table S1 [30 (link)]. PB mononuclear cells were obtained by centrifugation through Ficoll-Hypaque, washed in PBS and cryopreserved. CD34+ cells were selected by immunomagnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotech). To expand CD34+-enriched BP CML cells in vitro, cells were thawed and grown (overnight) in serum-free StemPro media (Invitrogen) supplemented with 1× nutrient supplements (Invitrogen) and a growth factor cocktail consisting of 200 pg ml−1 granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), 1 ng ml−1 granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 200 pg ml−1 stem cell factor (SCF), 50 pg ml−1 leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), 200 pg ml−1 macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1α) and 1 ng ml−1 interleukin 6 (IL-6). Cells were then subjected to drug treatment for 48 h in the same media. All cytokines were from PeproTech, except for GM-CSF (sargramostim, Immunex) and G-CSF (filgrastim, Amgen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Filgrastim for Muscular Dystrophy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of eleven muscular dystrophy patients were enrolled in this study. Detailed clinical characteristics of all patients are summarized in Table 1. Patients received their current standard treatment which was supplemented only by administration of filgrastim (Neupogen, Amgen) at the following doses: 5 μg/kg of body weight/day for five consecutive days (course 1). Such treatment course was repeated after 1 month (course 2) and after 2 months (course 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mobilization of Sheep Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For mobilization of stem cells to peripheral blood, two sheep received three doses every 24 h of G-CSF (Filgrastim; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) at a dose of 10 μg/kg body weight, subcutaneously (sc). On day 4, they were administered 20 mL of MPB from the jugular vein mixed with heparin 100 IU/mL, also sc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Synthesis and Formulation of Drug Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
R-BC154 and BOP were synthesized according to previously published methods21 (link)22 (link). BIO5192 (Tocris Bioscience), AMD3100 (octahydrochloride hydrate salt) (Sigma-Aldrich) and human G-CSF (Filgrastim, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) were used without further purification. For in vivo experiments, lyophilized powders of R-BC154 and BOP sodium salts were dissolved in 10% hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) in saline (w/v). A stock solution of BIO5192 in DMSO (10 mg ml−1) was diluted to 0.1 mg ml−1 in 10% HPβCD/saline immediately before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electrospun PLLA Scaffolds with GCSF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GCSF-releasing PLLA scaffolds (PLLA/GCSF sample) were prepared by electrospinning as previously described [18 ]. Briefly, GCSF (Filgrastim, 30 MUI/mL, sodium salt, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) was combined to a 13% w/w PLLA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) polymer solution at a concentration of 250 UI/g, corresponding to the dosage routinely used in literature and in clinical settings [19 (link)]. Procedural parameters [16 (link)] and sterilization techniques [20 ] are described elsewhere.
Pristine PLLA scaffolds (PLLA/CTRL sample) were manufactured using the same experimental conditions to obtain a control for biological experiments.
Mechanical and microstructural characterization of the materials, as well as determination of the drug release profile, have been reported elsewhere [18 ] and performed by means of field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), longitudinal uniaxial testing according to Sell et al. with peak stress (PS) and strain at failure (SF) evaluation [21 (link)], and specific ELISA assay for GCSF quantitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Filgrastim and Plerixafor for PBMNC Collection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Donor dogs were mobilized using 5 μg/kg filgrastim (Neupogen, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) SC q12h for 5 days, as previously described.7, 8, 15 Six of fifteen dogs also received 400 μg/kg of the CXCR‐4 inhibitor plerixafor (Mozibil, Sanofi US, Bridgewater, NJ), in addition to filgrastim, ~10 h before apheresis,16, 17 based on clinician preference. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMNC) collections were performed using either a CobeSpectra or Spectra Optia Apheresis System, as the previously described.7, 8, 15 Two dogs required more than one procedure to collect an adequate number of CD34+ cells to ensure complete hematologic reconstitution. After the collection was complete, the donor dogs recovered uneventfully, had their jugular and peripheral catheters removed, and released from the hospital the same day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mobilization and Enrichment of Human HSPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human HSPCs were mobilized in the PB of healthy donors, aged 18 to 60 and spanning both genders, through a five-day regimen of subcutaneous Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) (Filgrastim, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) injections at a dose of 10 μg/kg. This was followed by leukapheresis, conducted using the Cobe Spectra Apheresis System (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO, USA). The leukapheresis product, primarily mononuclear cell concentrates, underwent enrichment for CD34+ HSPCs utilizing the CliniMACS Plus instrument (Miltenyi Biotec, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and were subsequently cryopreserved for future use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Glycosyltransferase Activity Assay for HisDapGalNAcT2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The activity of HisDapGalNAcT2 was monitored using a glycosyltransferase activity kit (EA001, R&D Systems Europe Ltd., United Kingdom) based on the release of phosphate during transfer of glycosyl residues to an acceptor peptide. UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine was used as donor substrate in combination with the acceptor substrates mucin EA2 (Eurogentec SA Anaspec, Belgium) comprising the peptide sequence PTTDSTTPAPTTK [10 (link)] or Filgrastim (Neupogen®, Amgen Inc.). Prior to use, the elution buffer of the purified HisDapGalNAcT2 (50 mM Tris, 300 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole; pH 8) was exchanged by 25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.3. The protein sample was stored at 4–8°C for about 3 weeks. Control assays were carried out using purified rhGALNT2 isolated from murine myeloma NS0 cells (7507-GT-020, R&D Systems Europe Ltd., United Kingdom). The enzyme was provided by the manufacturer in 25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% w/v Brij-35; pH 7.5 and stored in the freezer at −80°C.
Samples with EA2 as acceptor substrate were desalted, concentrated (ZipTip®μC18, Millipore, USA) and embedded into a HCCA matrix (α-cyano-4-hydrosycinnamic acid) for subsequent MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. Filgrastim samples were digested with trypsin prior to Electrospray Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (ESI-MS). Both analyses were carried out at the life science center of the University of Hohenheim (Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!