The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti phospho smad1 5

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

Anti-phospho-SMAD1/5 is a lab equipment product that specifically recognizes and binds to the phosphorylated forms of SMAD1 and SMAD5 proteins. SMAD1 and SMAD5 are key components of the BMP signaling pathway.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using anti phospho smad1 5

1

Immunohistochemistry of SMAD1/5 and CTSK

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry staining of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue specimens was carried out using a primary antibody and a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody with appropriate concentration. Visualization of proteins was performed with diaminobenzidine and hematoxylin was used as counterstaining. The primary antibodies were anti-phospho-SMAD1/5 (Cell Signaling Technology, cat. 9516; 1:200) and anti-CTSK (Santa Cruz, cat. 48353; 1:200).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Phospho-Smad 1/5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were fixed and treated as described in [26 (link)]. The primary antibody was polyclonal anti-Phospho-Smad 1/5 (Cell Signalling; 1:10), the secondary was Alexa Fluor 488 Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (Invitrogen; 1:500), and nuclear staining was done with TO-PRO3 (Molecular Probes; 10 μM). Fluorescently labeled embryos were mounted in DAKO or 3:1 glycerol/PBS. Confocal images were collected using the Confocal Microscope C2+ (Nikon) and processed using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software (Nikon) and FIJI image analysis software [12 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Confocal Imaging of Drosophila Wing Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protocol was described previously (Harmansa et al., 2015 (link)). Each fly cross was set together with control and >10 wing imaginal discs from each genotype were processed in parallel. If the genotype could be distinguished, experimental and control samples were processed in the same tube. A representative wing disc was shown for all the experiments. Following primary antibodies were used; anti-Dpp (1:100; Matthew Gibson), anti-phospho-Smad1/5 (1:200; Cell Signaling, 9516S), anti-Brk (1:1000; Gines Morata), anti-Wg (1:120; DSHB, University of Iowa), anti-Ptc (1:40; DSHB, University of Iowa), anti-β-Galactosidase (1:1000; Promega Z378A), anti-mCherry (1:5000; Nigg lab, University of Basel). All the primary antibodies except anti-Dpp antibody were diluted in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) (Sigma) in PBT (0.03% Triton X-100/PBS). Anti-Dpp antibody was diluted in 5% NGS in Can Get Signal Immunostain Solution B (TOYOBO). All secondary antibodies from the AlexaFluor series were used at 1:500 dilutions. Wing discs were mounted in Vectashield (H-1000, Vector Laboratories). Images of wing discs were obtained using a Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope (section thickness 1 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Mechanisms of Glioblastoma Response to Temozolomide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagent and antibody sources were as follows: AG1478 (Calbiochem/Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), BMP4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride), MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide), temozolomide (TMZ) and anti-β-Actin-peroxidase conjugated antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany), anti-AKT, anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473), anti-phospho-AKT (Thr308), anti-BIM, anti-cleaved caspase 3, anti-cleaved caspase 7, anti-cleaved PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1), anti-EGF Receptor, anti-phospho-EGF receptor (Tyr1068), anti-FOXO3a, anti-phospho-FOXO3a (Thr32), anti-phospho-FOXO3a (Ser253), anti-phospho-FOXO3a (Ser318/321), anti-phospho-Rb (Ser807/811), anti-SMAD1, anti-SMAD3, anti-SMAD4, anti-SMAD5, anti-phospho-SMAD1/5 (Ser463/465), anti-phospho-SMAD3 (Ser423/425), anti-p27Kip1, anti-SOX2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly MA, USA), anti-OLIG2, anti-β-Tubulin beta III isoform (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA), anti-CYCLIN B1, p21CIP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA), anti-GFAP (BD Pharmingen San Jose, CA), anti-NESTIN (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and anti-CYCLIN D1 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Protein Levels in MEFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEFs grown on six wells were harvested in lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl and 1% Triton with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Tissues were minced by a Dounce homogenizer using 1-2 ml RIPA buffer. A total of 30 µg of protein were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. After blocking of the membranes by 5% dry milk/TTBS, membranes were incubated in following primary antibody solutions: anti-Smurf1 (Novus, 1D7); anti-Smurf2 (Abcam, EP629Y3); anti-Smad1 (Cell Signaling, 9743); anti-Smad2 (Abcam, EP784Y); anti-Smad3 (Abcam, ab28379), anti-Smad5 (Abcam, EP619Y), anti-phospho-Smad1/5 (Cell Signaling, 41D10), anti-phospho-Smad2 (Cell Signaling, 138D4); anti-phospho-Smad3 (Rockland, 600-401-919), GAPDH (Santa Cruz, 0411), HSC70 (Santa Cruz, B-6). Protein detection was carried out using HRP-coupled species-specific secondary antibodies and ECL solution, exposed to Hyperfilm ECL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analyzing Signaling Pathways in C2C12 and BRITER Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell extracts were collected from C2C12 or BRITER cells in complete lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 1% NP40 substitute, HALT protease inhibitor cocktail (ThermoScientific). Proteins were resolved by electrophoresis on pre-cast 10% NuPage Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked in 5% BSA-TBS-0.5% Tween-20 for 15 minutes, then incubated at 4° overnight with primary antibodies. Antibodies used were: rabbit anti-phospho-p38 MAPK (cat. no. 9211), anti-p38 MAPK XP (8690), anti-phospho-SMAD1/5 (9516), anti-SMAD1 XP (6944), anti-phospho-SMAD2/3 (8828), anti-SMAD2/3 XP (8685), anti-phospho-JNK (4668), anti-SAPK/JNK (9252), anti-phospho-Akt XP (4060), pan anti-Akt (4691), anti-phospho ERK p42/p44 (4377), anti-ERK p42/p44 (9102), anti-phospho-MKK3/6 (12280), anti-MKK3 (8535), anti-phospho-TAK1 (4531), anti-TAK1 (5206), anti-HA (3274), and anti-FLAG (14793); all from Cell Signaling); and mouse anti-p38α (cat. no. 33-1300), anti-p38β (33-8700; both ThermoFisher) and anti-β-actin (Sigma A1978). Proteins were visualized with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Bio-Rad) with WestPico (ThermoFisher) or Immobilon (Millipore) chemiluminescence reagents. Images were obtained and analyzed for relative densitometric relationships on a LI-COR C-DiGit scanner using Image Studio software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescent Analysis of Hindlimb Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hindlimb samples were dissected and fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C overnight. After fixation, samples were washed three times, 10 minutes each in PBS. The fixed hindlimb samples were then soaked in 30% sucrose solution for 2 hours and embedded in O.C.T. Cryo-section was performed at 12 μm thickness in the sagittal orientation. Immunofluorescent staining was performed as previously described (28 (link)). The primary antibodies used include anti-phospho-Smad1/5 (Cell Signaling Technologies, catalog# 13820, 1:50 dilution) and anti-Sox9 (Santa Cruz, catalog# sc-20095, 1:25 dilution). The secondary antibody was Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Thermo Fisher, catalog# A11011, 1:500 dilution).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analysis of Smad and VEGFR Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were electrophoresed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose blotting membranes (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany). Blots were probed with monoclonal anti-Smad1, anti-Smad2/3, anti-phospho-Smad1/5, or anti-phospho-Smad2/3 antibodies (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). Signals were detected using a chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) and a luminescent image analyzer (LAS-3000; Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
To evaluate VEGF receptor phosphorylation, HUVEC extracts (400 μg of protein) were mixed with 4 μg of VEGFR1 or VEGFR2 polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and Protein G-agarose beads (Invitrogen/ThermoFisher Scientific), and incubated at 4°C overnight with gentle rotation. Immune complexes were precipitated by centrifugation and analyzed by western blotting using an anti-phospho-tyrosine antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mandibular Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry staining was performed on 4-μm-thick coronal sections prepared from 6 mandibles of KO or control mice using a DAB substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instruction. The primary antibodies used for immunohistochemistry are: anti-phospho-ERK (9101, 1:200, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Lef1 (C12A5, 1:200, Cell signaling, Danver, MA, USA), anti-β-catenin (sc-7963, Santa Cruz), anti-Sox2 (ab97959, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), and anti-phospho-SMAD1/5 (9516, Cell Signaling). Methyl green was used for counterstaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis in Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue specimens were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer supplemented with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, a protease inhibitor mixture, and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail-2 and cocktail-3 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and equal amounts of protein from each sample were subjected to immunoblot assay. Proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with anti-hepcidin, anti-ferritin (R&D, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), anti-NOX-2, anti-NOX-4, anti-phospho-STAT-3, anti-STAT-3, anti-phospho-SMAD1/5, anti-SMAD1, anti-SMAD5, and anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!