The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using spherisorb ods2 column

1

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of DXA3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Several different LC separations were used on a 4000 Q-Trap platform. For high resolution mass analysis and fragmentation of free DXA3, a reversed-phase UPLC Fourier Transform MS method was used (Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Elite) using a Spherisorb ODS2 column (5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm; Waters) with a flow rate of 1 ml·min−1. Solvent B was increased from 20 to 42.5% over 50 min, then increased to 90% over 10.5 min, held for 4 min, and then returned to 20% over 1 min. Equilibration time between runs was 4.5 min. Analysis was performed using heated ESI in negative ion mode at sheath, auxiliary and sweep gas flows of 70, 20, and 0, and capillary and source heater temperatures at 300 and 350 °C, respectively. LC/MS of parent ions was monitored using accurate mass in Fourier MS mode. Negative MS/MS spectra were acquired using higher energy collision-induced dissociation. Data-dependent MS3 of m/z 351 was carried out in ion trap-MS mode on the LTQ ion trap.
For MS/MS of m/z 351 or m/z 359, collision-induced dissociation (CID) was used with a resolving power of 30,000 in negative FTMS mode. Data-dependent MS3 of m/z 351 or m/z 359 from DXA3-d8 was carried out in negative FTMS mode with a resolving power of 15,000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Etoposide Quantification by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Etoposide was measured by HPLC with UV detection. The method was a modification of the method of Haim et al [78 (link)]. Aliquots of cell medium and of supernatant of cell extracts were diluted 1:1 with methanol, in order to obtain a 50% methanol solution [79 (link)]. HPLC was equipped with a Waters Spherisorb ODS2 column (particle diameter 5μm) [80 (link)]. The isocratic elutions were performed with a mobile phase constituted by 0.01M Na acetate buffer pH 3.8 and acetonitrile in 7/3 ratio. The flow rate was 1ml/min and the detection was by absorbance at 250 nm. Peak identification and quantification were made by peak comparison with standard etoposide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Liver DHA and AA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver tissue (25 mg) was homogenized in 100 μl of PBS with 0.01% BHT (2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol, Merck Ref. 822021). Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Ref. 500–0006). Lipid extraction was carried out following the protocol described by Bligh and Dyer53 . DHA and AA were quantified using multiple reaction monitoring performed in a linear ion trap triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (QTrap 4000; Sciex, Concord, Ontario, Canada) coupled with an electrospray ionization source to an Ekspert UltraHPLC 100 (Eksigent, Dublin, CA, USA) with a Spherisorb ODS2 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm × 5 μm) (Waters). The instrument control, data acquisition, and lipid mediator quantification were performed using Analyst 1.5.2 software (Sciex). Mass spectrometry was carried out in negative ion mode using specific transitions 327/287 and 327/229. Calibration curves were constructed with an internal standard 332/288 and r values of curves were > 0.99 in all cases. DHA and AA (Sigma D2534 and A9673) were used as standard in the LC-MS/MS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification and Characterization of DXA3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DXA3 was purified from lipid extracts of thrombin-activated platelets or COX-1 reactions using HPLC/UV on a Spherisorb ODS2 column (5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm; Waters) with a gradient of 20–42.5% solvent B (acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) in solvent A (water, 0.1% formic acid) over 50 min, 42.5–90% solvent B from 50 to 60 min, 90% solvent B from 60 to 64.5 min, 90 to 20% from 64.5 to 65.5 min, and 20% solvent B from 65.5 to 75 min with a flow rate of 1 ml·min−1, and fractions collected at 30-s intervals. DXA3-containing fractions were identified using MS using m/z 351.2 → 165.1, and then H2O was removed using Sep-Pak C18 cartridge purification (Waters). DXA3 was stored in methanol at −80 °C, prior to derivatization and GC/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Paclitaxel-Loaded Nanoemulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nanoemulsions (500 μL) were freeze-dried and dissolved in 1.5 mL ethanol with sonication for 1 h. The solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter, and the amount of lipiodol was determined at 260 nm using UV-visible absorption spectrophotometry (UV-1601, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). As for the loading yield and efficiency of paclitaxel, the nanoemulsions (1 mL) were freeze-dried and dissolved in 1 mL acetonitrile with sonication for 1 h. The solution was filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter, paclitaxel in the filtrate was determined using reversed phase HPLC (Agilent 1100 series, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, USA) equipped with a Waters Spherisorb ODS2 column (C18, 5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm). Acetonitrile was used as an isocratic mobile phase at a rate of 1 mL min−1. The absorption of the eluted solution was determined at 227 nm using a standard curve of paclitaxel in acetonitrile.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Neurotransmitter Release Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The secreted amino acids (Asp, Glu, Gly and GABA) were analysed by HPLC performed following the procedure described by Márquez and coworkers [40] (link). Cells, after 10 culture days, were washed twice with 1 ml of Locke medium. The medium was removed and cells were stimulated for 15 min at 37°C with 0.5 ml of fresh Locke medium containing the different SNAP concentrations indicated in each case. After stimulation, we followed these steps: (i) the solution containing the released amino acids were collected (ii) the cells were lysed by adding 0.5 ml of distilled water and this suspension, containing the unreleased neurotransmitters, was centrifuged at 13000×g for 5 min. Supernatants were collected out.
The amino acid concentrations were determined by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography using a precolumn derivation with dansyl chloride and UV detection at 254 nm. Peaks were integrated using a Spectraphysic integrator and then quantified and compared with standards for these neurotransmitters. The separation of dansyl derivatives was carried out using a Waters Spherisorb ODS 2 column (5 μM particle size; 15×0.46 cm).
Results were expressed as % of amino acid release as compared to the total amino acid content (amino acid in the medium plus amino acid inside the cells).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Doxorubicin Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system used was an Agilent 1100 Series (Wilmington, DE) equipped with a scanning fluorescent detector with excitation and emission wavelengths set at 480 and 560 nm, respectively. Agilent Chemstation software was used for data acquisition. Separation was achieved on a Waters Spherisorb ODS2 column (4 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) fitted with a guard cartridge (BDS-Hypersil-C18, 5 μM). Elution was performed with mobile phase comprised of 65% 50 mM monosodium phosphate, pH 2.2, and 35% acetonitrile. A constant flow rate of 1.25 ml/min was used for the separation. The column was set to 28°C and the injection volume was 25 μl.
Doxo, Aldoxo, and the internal standard daunorubicin (Sigma-Aldrich, cat # 30450) demonstrated average retention times of 4.06, 4.39, and 6.52 min, respectively, and were sufficiently resolved under the applied assay conditions. In the organ samples analyzed, Aldoxo eluted with the retention time of Doxo. No interfering peaks were observed under the chromatography conditions used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of [14C]DXA3 by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
[14C]AA was oxidized using COX-1 as described for unlabeled AA above. The amount of [14C]DXA3 was determined by comparison with a [14C]AA standard curve analyzed using LC separation with radiochemical detection (Berthold Technologies) using a Spherisorb ODS2 column (5 μm, 150 × 4.6 mm; Waters) with a gradient of 20–42.5% solvent B (acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) in solvent A (water, 0.1% formic acid) over 50 min, 42.5–90% solvent B from 50 to 60 min, 90% solvent B from 60 to 64.5 min, 90 to 20% from 64.5 to 65.5 min and 20% solvent B from 65.5 to 75 min with a flow rate of 1 ml·min−1, and fractions were collected at 30-s intervals for LC/MS/MS confirmation of [14C]DXA3. The same gradient was also used for LC/MS/MS detection of [14C]DXA3 (m/z 353.2 → 165.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Fungal Biomass and APAP Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbial dry biomass was estimated gravimetrically in duplicate. Each sample of 50 mL was filtered through quantitative filter paper (VWR International, Leuven, The Netherlands). The fungal pellets were dried at 60 °C for 48 h. The samples were placed in a desiccator for 60 min and weighted afterwards. The concentration of biomass was calculated as grams of dry biomass per liter of medium. To determine glucose consumption in fungal cultures, the glucose concentration was measured using the commercial kit D-Glucose GOD-POD (NzyTech, Lisbon, Portugal).
APAP concentrations were quantified in the fungal culture supernatants by using a high-performance liquid chromatography system L-7100 (LaChrom HPLC System, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) consisting of a quaternary gradient pump, and L-7400 UV detector. The whole system was controlled using the Merck HPLC System Manager software. The separation of the analytes was performed at ambient temperature in a Waters Spherisorb ODS2 column (5.0 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), using an isocratic condition with a mobile phase composed of water (pH 3.5, adjusted with orthophosphoric acid) and acetonitrile, at a 90:10 (v/v) and a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Detection was performed at 254 nm. Under these conditions, APAP, HQ, CAT, and APA could be separated within 12 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Calliterpenone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For residue analysis, plant samples (rice leaves, straw, grains, husk, and soil) were collected from the plants on which morphological data were recorded. Samples (in triplicate) that received maximum concentration treatment were considered for the study. After harvesting the plants, straws, leaves, and grains were separated. Furthermore, husks were removed from grains by hand hulling. Samples were grounded to a fine powder, and a total of 1.0 g of the powdered tissue was extracted in 10 ml of 2% alkaline water (200 mg NaOH in 10 ml water) for 2 h, followed by portioning of the extracts using dichloromethane. The dichloromethane extracts were then dried and later dissolved in methanol. Before HPLC injection, solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). For extraction of calliterpenone, the HPLC analysis was performed as per the method described by our group (Verma et al., 2009 (link)) using an LC-10A HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) with acetonitrile:water (45:55) as mobile phase and detection was made at 220 nm using a Waters Spherisorb ODS-2 column (250 × 4.6 mm I.D., 10 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!