The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using lsr 2 facs machine

1

Annexin V Apoptosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Knockdowns were performed in 6 well dishes. Cells were collected 48 or 72 hours post-transfection, stained with the Pacific Blue Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (Biolegend) and analyzed on a BD LSR II FACS machine. Proportions of ANXAV- and propidium iodide-positive cells were assessed in FlowJo v10. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction test (GraphPad Prism v7.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Knockdowns were performed in 6 well dishes. Cells were collected 72 hours post-transfection, washed once in PBS, fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 min at 4°C pelleted pelleted at 850xg for 10 min, and washed again in PBS. Pellets were resuspended in 50ul 100ug/ml RNase A and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. 200ul 50ug/ml propidium iodide was added and the suspension was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 20 min. Cells were passed through a cell strainer filter and analyzed on a BD LSR II FACS machine. Proportions of G1, S and G2 cells were assessed in FlowJo v10. Significance was calculated by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple correction test (GraphPad Prism v7.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Xenograft Tumor Development Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight- to ten-week-old NOD/SCID IL2Rγ−/− mice were intravenously injected with 1*105 MOLM-13 cells. Beforehand, AML cells were cultured alone or in the presence of either purified ECAR or control vector modified T cells at an E:T ratio of 5∶1 for 4 h. Prior to the experiment, T cells were irradiated at 5 Gy to prevent xenograft reaction in recipient mice [50] . Mice were sacrificed when visible tumors developed at injection site and single-cell suspensions from bone marrow obtained from femur and tibia of the left hind leg were prepared. Erythrocytes were removed by lysis and nucleated cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45.1/PE-Cy7 (eBioscience, clone A20), anti-human CD3/APC-eFluor780 (eBioscience, clone SK7), CD19/APC (BD Bioscience, clone HIB19), CD33/PE (eBiosience, clone HIM3-4), and CD45/AlexaFluor700 (Biolegend, clone HI30) mabs. Doublet discrimination was routinely carried out and dead cells were excluded by 4, 6 diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)-staining (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). All measurements were performed on a BD LSRII FACS machine (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was realized using FlowJo-software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Xenograft Tumor Model with Human T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 8–10-week-old NSG mice were injected i.v. with 1 × 106 genetically modified human T cells. On day 28 after T-cell injection, 5 × 105 MOLM-13 cells were given i.v. to the mice and treatment was started 5 days later. For this purpose, 250 ng per g mouse body weight of the TM was injected i.p. twice a day over 2 consecutive days. Mice were killed when severe derogation of health occurred because of tumor development and single-cell suspensions from bone marrow obtained from femur and tibia of the left hind leg were prepared. Erythrocytes were removed by lysis and nucleated cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45.1/PE-Cy7 (clone A20, eBioscience), anti-human CD3/APC-eFluor 780 (clone SK7, eBioscience), CD19/APC (clone HIB19, BD Biosciences), CD33/PE (clone HIM3-4, eBioscience) and CD45/AlexaFluor 700 (clone HI30, BioLegend) mAbs. Doublet discrimination was routinely carried out and dead cells were excluded by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany). All measurements were performed on a BD LSRII FACS machine (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was realized using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HUVEC Apoptosis Induction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HUVEC were treated with 1 μM CA4P for 60 min +/- 30 min 1 μM S1P pre-treatment. Following treatment cells were washed in PBS then detached using 2 mM EDTA at 37°C for 15-20 minutes. Cell suspensions were collected, washed twice in PBS then resuspended in ice-cold Immunomix containing mouse anti-human CD144 (BD Pharmingen, BD555661) antibody at a dilution of 1:100. Cells were incubated at 4°C for 1 h, then washed twice and resuspended in ice cold Immuonomix containing Alexafluor 555 (Invitrogen) at 1:200. Cells were incubated at 4°C for 30 mins then washed twice in cold PBS and resuspended in 300 ul cold PBS before analysis on an LSRII FACS machine (BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Stem Cell Marker Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AP and SSEA1 staining were examined using Stemgent Alkaline Phosphatase Staining Kit II (Stemgent) and Phycoerythrin conjugated mouse anti-SSEA1 antibodies (R&D Systems), respectively, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. SSEA1 marker expression was evaluated on a LSR II FACS machine (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Peripheral Blood Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Weekly peripheral blood samples were drawn for immunophenotyping including flow cytometric analysis of T cell subsets and other markers consistent with immune activation. Peripheral blood cells and cells from tissue taken at the time of necropsy (splenocytes, graft infiltrating cells, and cells from the draining lymph nodes) were stained for CD3, CD4, CD8, CCR7, and CD45RA (Biolegend, San Diego, CA). Intracellular staining with anti-Foxp3 was performed using a Foxp3 intranuclear staining kit (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were analyzed using an LSR II FACS machine (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar, San Carlos, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Stem Cell Marker Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AP and SSEA1 staining were examined using Stemgent Alkaline Phosphatase Staining Kit II (Stemgent) and Phycoerythrin conjugated mouse anti-SSEA1 antibodies (R&D Systems), respectively, following the manufacturer’s recommendations. SSEA1 marker expression was evaluated on a LSR II FACS machine (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Allogenic Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly isolated lymph node-derived lymphocytes from naive Brown Norway rats were collected as responder cells for MLRs. Cryopreserved liver-resident immune cells, isolated from the livers of control and experimental Lewis rats, were recovered to serve as allogeneic stimulator cells. In Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml, stimulators were labeled with a 1:1,000 dilution of Cell Trace Violet (CTV), while responders were separately labeled with a 1:1,000 dilution of Cell Trace Far Red (CTFR) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Stimulator cells then received 20 grays of irradiation prior to culture. In a 96-well plate, 2 × 105 responders were plated with 0.5 × 105 irradiated stimulators in RPMI media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Negative controls were established using irradiated CTFR-labeled leukocytes derived from naive Brown Norway livers. Non-specific stimulation using activating plate-bound anti-CD3 (1ug/mL; BD Biosciences) and soluble anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml; BD Biosciences) served as positive controls. All experimental conditions were performed in triplicate. After 4 days of culture at 37°C, cells were collected and flow cytometry data were acquired using an LSR II FACS machine (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing Stem Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before flow cytometry analysis or sorting, cells were dissociated as described above or washed and dissociated using TrypLE (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were resuspended in a 100μL staining volume of fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (Hanks' balanced salt solution + 0.1% bovine serum albumin) and kept on ice. The following antibodies were used: CD133/1, and CD133/2 biotin (Miltenyi Biotech, San Diego, CA, USA), CD90 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD15 (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA), CD49f (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA), AB25 (Miltenyi Biotech, San Diego, CA, USA) and PE-CY7 strep (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). All analyses were conducted using a LSR II FACS machine (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) or sorted on an ARIA-II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) at the Stanford University FACS facility. Appropriate isotype controls were used to control for nonspecific isotype background.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!