The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using axiozoom v16 macroscope

1

Histochemical Staining of GUS Activity in Plant Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GUS activity was detected using histochemical staining as previously described (Pichon et al.66 (link); roots were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C). After staining, roots were washed twice in sterile water and observed in bright field using an AxioZoom V16 macroscope (Zeiss, https://www.zeiss.fr) or a Leica DM550 B (Leica Microsystems). Root sections were included in 3% agarose and then sliced into 80-µm sections using a VT 1200S vibratome (Leica Microsystems, http://www.leica-microsystems.com/). Vibratome sections mounted in water were observed in bright field using with an Olympus BX53 microscope (www.olympus-lifescience.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Midrib Histochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seventy micrometers-thick transversal sections of the midrib of leaflets 4 or 5 from the L1 leaf were cut using a vibratome (Leica) and stained with periodic acid (1% w/v, Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MI, USA) and Schiff’s reagent (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). Observations were carried out with an Axiozoom V16 macroscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a Plan-Neofluar Z 2.3x/0.57 RWD 10.6-mm objective. At least eight sections from four plants per genotype and condition were observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Drosophila Morphology Responses to Light

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flies homozygous for Delta::CRY2, which are viable and fertile in the dark, were reared on standard German food (Bloomington Drosophila stock centre recipe) in standard acrylic fly vials and exposed to ambient light from larval stages until eclosion. These adults, along with their counterparts reared in the dark, were imaged on a Zeiss stereo‐dissection microscope in order to characterize variations in wing, notum and eye morphology. For embryonic analysis, homozygous Delta::CRY2 embryos were collected for two hours on apple‐juice agar plates in acrylic cages maintained either in the dark, or exposed to ambient light for 24 h at 25°C. Cuticle preparations of collected embryos were made using Hoyer's medium and imaged on a Zeiss stereo‐dissection microscope. For Delta‐CRY2 adult nota and eyes, the following protocol was used: pupae were collected at the puparium formation stage and illuminated under a white lamp source (20 W) or placed in the dark at 25°C until they hatched. Adults were frozen at −20°C for 15 min and then immediately prepared for bright‐field imaging using a Zeiss AxioZoom V16 macroscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Imaging and Analysis of Paper-Based Reactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of paper discs were collected on a Zeiss Axio Zoom V16 Macroscope (magnification 7x) with an AxioCam MRm in a humidified glass chamber or through the bottom of a clear bottom 384-well plate. Collected images were then stitched together using Zeiss Zen software into large composite images for further processing in ImageJ. Experiments were arranged so that images of matching control and treatment paper-based reactions were collected together such that parameters could be adjusted for all samples simultaneously. Once optimized, images of individual paper discs were cropped and arrayed into figures. For GFP expression in the S30 cell-free system, which exhibits a high level of autofluorescence, we used a Nuance camera to collect multispectral images between 500 and 620 nM. Perkin Elmer Nuance 3.0.2 software was then used to unmix the spectral signature of the GFP from that of the cell extract. A similar approach was used to create a absorbance signature (420 to 720 nM) for imaged paper discs with p-nitrophenol, the chitinase cleavage product of 4-Nitrophenyl N,N′-diacetyl-b-D-chitobioside. Images collected with the Nuance camera were scaled using bilinear transformation. For a few composite images, areas around the paper discs were masked to remove extraneous signal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PERLs-DAB Staining with Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PERLs-DAB staining was performed as described12 (link) with minor modifications. DAB intensification was performed for 5 min with a final concentration of 0.00625% DAB. Clearing solution was modified to a higher concentration (8:2:1 hydro-chlorate:water:glycerol (w/v)). Roots were observed and documented with the Axiozoom-V16 macroscope (Zeiss) using the × 2.3 objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal Imaging of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal imaging was performed on a Zeiss LSM 880 with the following objectives: 20X/0.8 NA Plan-APOCHROMAT, 40X/1.3 NA Plan-APOCHROMAT, and 63X/1.4 NA Plan-APOCHROMAT. WISH samples and whole-mount DAPI-stained worms were imaged using Zeiss AxioZoom V16 macroscope. Image processing was performed using ImageJ for general brightness/contrast adjustments, maximum-intensity projections, and tile stitching (Preibisch et al., 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescent Protein Visualization in Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FP visualization was realized at 5 dpa. Leaves were imaged with an AxioZoom V16 macroscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using 450‐ to 490‐nm/500‐ to 550‐nm excitation/emission wavelength filters for EG and of 538—562 nm/570—640 nm for TagRFP visualization. Images were processed using ImageJ (Schneider et al., 2012) and GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP, www.gimp.org).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Cutaneous Receptive Fields

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Receptive fields in cleared AP-stained skin were imaged using a Zeiss AxioZoom V.16 Macroscope. The number of LLEs per receptive field were manually counted using the Cell Counter plugin in FIJI/ImageJ. Receptive fields in representative images were semi-manually traced using the Simple Neurite Tracer plugin in Fiji/ImageJ [50 (link)]. Receptive fields in cleared immunohistochemically labeled skin were imaged on a Zeiss AxioImager M.2 microscope with an Apotome.2 structured illumination module. The number of LLEs and non-LLE terminal branches were counted manually using the Cell Counter plugin in FIJI/ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Embryo Imaging and Clearing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1% low‐melt agarose (ROTH, Karlsruhe, Germany)‐embedded embryos were imaged using a Leica MZ6 stereo microscope equipped with a Leica DFC425 camera (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wezlar, Germany) or a Zeiss Axio Zoom V16 macroscope equipped with an Axiocam 305 color camera, as well as a PlanNeoFluar Z 2.3×/0.57 objective (Carl Zeiss GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany). Transmitted light bright‐field and oblique illumination were used as contrast methods. Embryo clearing for β‐galactosidase‐stained samples was performed using 1:2 benzoic alcohol–benzyl benzoate (BABB) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 3 hr after dehydration through an alcohol series (50% ethanol, 95% ethanol, absolute ethanol, and methanol).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Swarming Colony Droplet Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plates and swarming colonies were prepared as explained above. Plates were taken out of the incubator and placed under a Axiozoom V16 macroscope (Zeiss), set at the lowest magnification (field of view is 25.7x21.5mm), equipped with a CMOS camera (BlackFly S, FLIR, USA), and illuminated through a transilluminator (Zeiss) with a mirror position that mimics DIC illumination. 1 µL droplets of swarming media (recipe identical to that of the swarming plate, but without agar) were deposited on the surface of the gel, either inside or outside the swelling front generated by the colony. A movie was recorded as tens of droplets were deposited. Footprint diameters were measured, immediately after deposition, using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!