The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti fgf21

Manufactured by Abcam
Sourced in United Kingdom

Anti-FGF21 is a laboratory antibody product used for the detection and quantification of Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) in various biological samples. FGF21 is a metabolic regulator that plays a role in glucose and lipid homeostasis. This antibody can be used in techniques such as Western blotting, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry to measure FGF21 levels.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using anti fgf21

1

Western Blot Analysis of Islet Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Islet and cell proteins were extracted with RIPA. Extracted proteins were separated by 8–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-rad Heidemannstraße, Germany), which were blocked with 5% milk and then proved overnight with anti-FGF21 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-phospho-FRS, 2-anti-FRS2, anti-phospho-ERK1/2, anti-ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA), or anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) primary antibodies at room temperature (RT). Horseradish peroxide-conjugated secondary antibodies were incubated at RT with membranes for 2 h after washing with phosphate buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20. Labeled protein bands were visualized on autoradiography films (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan) following application of ECL detection reagent (GE healthcare, Chicago, IL). Protein bands were quantitated in Image software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and normalized to β-actin. The primary and secondary antibodies used are listed in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Molecular Signaling Analysis in FBS-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Cytiva (Marlborough, MA, USA). Reverse transcriptase and SYBR green reagents were obtained from ThermoFisher (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Antibodies were obtained from different sources: anti-β-actin (Novus Cat. # NB600-501; St. Louis, MO, USA), anti-FGF21 (abcam Cat. #ab171941), anti-phospho-Akt (Ser473) (Cell Signaling, Cat. # 9271; Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Akt (Cell Signaling, Cat. # 4691), anti-phospho-CREB (87G3) (Cell Signaling, Cat. # 9197), anti-CREB (48H2) (Cell Signaling Cat. # 9197), anti-phospho-JNK (Thr183/Thr185) (Cell Signaling, Cat. # 9251), anti-JNK (Cell Signaling, Cat. # 9258), anti-phospho-p38 (Thr182) (Santa Cruz Cat. # sc-7973), anti-p38 (Cell Signaling, Cat. # 9212), anti-phospho-NF-κB p65 (S536) (R&D Systems, Cat. # KCB7226; Minneapolis, MN, USA), and anti-NF-κB p65 (Cell Signaling, Cat. # 8242). The materials for the animal diets were obtained from Research Diets Inc. (New Brunswick, NJ, USA). Glucosamine hydrochloride (Cat. 66842), along with all other unspecified chemicals and reagents utilized in this project, was procured from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis in Kidney

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis was performed to measure the protein levels in kidney tissue and HK-2 cells. Protein in total cell lysates was extracted and quantified by BCA Protein Assay. Protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules). After blocking the membrane in a TBST solution containing 10% (w/v) non-fat milk for 1.5 h at room temperature, different proteins were probed with corresponding antibodies overnight at 4°C. The following antibodies were used: anti-FGF21 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-SIRT1 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-TIM-1 (1:20,000, Abcam), anti-Bax (1:10,000, Abcam), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-β-Klotho (1:1000, Abcam), anti-β-actin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-GAPDH (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology). Subsequently, membranes were washed three times with TBST and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Protein signals were detected using a Tanon 5200 Chemiluminescence Imaging system (Tanon-5200) and bands were quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Islet Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Islet and cell proteins were extracted with CytoBuster Protein Extraction Reagent (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). Extracted proteins were separated by 8–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-rad, Heidemannstraße, Germany), which were blocked with 5% milk and then probed overnight with anti-FGF21 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-LC3 (Novus, St. Charles, MO, USA), anti-phospho-AMPKα, anti-AMPKα, anti-phospho-ERK1/2, anti-ERK1/2, anti-phosphomTOR, anti-mTOR (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA, USA), or anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) primary antibodies at room temperature. Horseradish peroxide-conjugated secondary antibodies were incubated at RT with the membranes for 2 h after washing with Phosphate buffered saline with Tween-20. Labeled protein bands were visualized on autoradiography films (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan) following application of ECL detection reagent (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The protein bands were quantitated in ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) and normalized to β-actin. The primary and secondary antibodies used are listed in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Evaluation of Kidney Tissue Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to histological analysis, kidney tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for over 24 h, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5 μm sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), sealed with neutral resin, and observed under an optical microscope. Tissue damage and necrosis were assessed by microscopy (×400) in 10–20 randomly selected fields of view. Tissue damage was scored by the percentages of renal tubular injury, cell debris, brush border loss, and cast formation (0, no damage; 1, less than 25% damage; 2, 25–50% damage; 3, 50–75% damage; 4, more than 75% damage).
For immunohistochemistry analysis, 5 μm kidney tissue sections were incubated with anti-FGF21 (Abcam; Cambridge, United Kingdom) and anti-SIRT1 (Abcam; Cambridge, United Kingdom), followed by the secondary antibody (ZSGB-Bio, Beijing, China) and DAB. For each mouse, 10–20 randomly selected fields of view were scanned under an upright microscope. The percentages of positive staining regions of FGF21 or SIRT1 were quantified using Image-Pro 6.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoblot Analysis of Mouse Liver Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse liver tissue or cultured cells were lysed with RIPA buffer and subjected to immunoblot analysis as described previously [47 (link)]. The membranes were probed with anti-ERRγ (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; diluted 1:1000), anti-β-actin (AbFrontier, Seoul, Korea; diluted 1:5000) [24 (link)] and anti-FGF21 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK; diluted 1:1000) [48 (link)] antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Protein Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used: anti‐p62 (SQSTM) (Abnova), anti‐LAMP2 (Abcam), anti‐FGF21 (abcam), anti‐Bip (BD Biosciences), anti‐Gapdh (Santa Cruz), anti‐SREBP1c (Santa Cruz), anti‐SREBP2 (abcam), anti‐ATF6 (abcam), anti‐LC3 (Nanotools), anti‐Tom20 (SantaCruz), anti‐lipin1 (SantaCruz, sc‐376874). All other antibodies were from Cell Signalling.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of Hippocampal Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was followed by the standard protocol as we previously described [47 (link)]. Protein samples were extracted from the stored hippocampus tissues, and they were homogenized in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Life Technologies) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE eletrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 1 h and incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibodies: anti-FGF21 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-FGFR1 (1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-phospho- FGFR1 (1:1000, Abcam), anti-β-Klotho (1:1000, Abcam), anti-Akt (1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-phospho-Akt (1:100, Santa Cruz), anti-GSK-3β (1:1000, Cell Signaling), antiphospho- GSK-3β (1:1000, Cell Signaling), anti-IL-1β (1:1000, Abcam), anti-TNFα (1:1000, Abcam), anti-IL-6 (1:500, Novus), anti-PSD95 (1:1000, Abcam), antisynaptophysin (1:1000, Cell Signaling), and anti-actin (1:10,000, Sigma). Membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare). Quantitative densitometry was performed on the protein bands by using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of FGF21 and Vimentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (Geller et al., 2019 (link)). Mice were transcardially perfused with saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were collected and stored in 4% PFA overnight followed by 30% sucrose for 48 h. Coronal brain sections (50 μm) were collected using a cryostat (Leica). Free-floating sections were washed in 1X PBS and incubated in Citrate Buffer (Abcam) for 15 min at room temperature (RT), followed by 2 min at 60 C° and 90 C°. Slices were incubated in blocking buffer (5% donkey serum in PBST) for 1 h at RT and incubated in primary rabbit monoclonal anti-Fgf21 (1:100, Abcam) for three nights and chicken anti-Vimentin (1:2000, Millipore) overnight at 4 C°. Sections were subsequently washed and incubated in secondary antibody donkey anti-rabbit AF594 and donkey anti-chicken AF647 (Jackson Immunoresearch) or goat anti-rabbit Texas Red and goat anti-chicken AF488 for 2 h at RT. Slices were mounted on slides with Vectashield antifade mounting media with DAPI and imaged using an Olympus BX61 Light Microscope or an Olympus FV3000 confocal laser scanning microscope. Staining for cFos was performed as previously using a cFos antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling) (Jensen-Cody et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of FGF21 and Vimentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (Geller et al., 2019 (link)). Mice were transcardially perfused with saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were collected and stored in 4% PFA overnight followed by 30% sucrose for 48 h. Coronal brain sections (50 μm) were collected using a cryostat (Leica). Free-floating sections were washed in 1X PBS and incubated in Citrate Buffer (Abcam) for 15 min at room temperature (RT), followed by 2 min at 60 C° and 90 C°. Slices were incubated in blocking buffer (5% donkey serum in PBST) for 1 h at RT and incubated in primary rabbit monoclonal anti-Fgf21 (1:100, Abcam) for three nights and chicken anti-Vimentin (1:2000, Millipore) overnight at 4 C°. Sections were subsequently washed and incubated in secondary antibody donkey anti-rabbit AF594 and donkey anti-chicken AF647 (Jackson Immunoresearch) or goat anti-rabbit Texas Red and goat anti-chicken AF488 for 2 h at RT. Slices were mounted on slides with Vectashield antifade mounting media with DAPI and imaged using an Olympus BX61 Light Microscope or an Olympus FV3000 confocal laser scanning microscope. Staining for cFos was performed as previously using a cFos antibody (1:1000, Cell Signaling) (Jensen-Cody et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!