The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas software for windows

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS software for Windows is a comprehensive data analysis and statistical software suite. It provides a wide range of tools for data management, analytics, and reporting. The software is designed to run on the Windows operating system and offers a user-friendly interface for efficient data manipulation and statistical modeling.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

42 protocols using sas software for windows

1

Peri-Implant Disease Risk Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A descriptive analysis was performed to assess all the obtained data. Continuous quantitative variables were described as medians and interquartile ranges, and categorical qualitative variables as frequencies and percentages (%). The continuous variables are graphically represented using boxplots [the box shows the first (Q1), second (median), and third quartiles (Q3), and as whiskers, the values correspond to 1.5 times Q3] and categorical variables using bar graphs. The quantitative variables were compared using the non‐parametric Mann–Whitney test and qualitative variables using the chi‐square test or Fisher's exact test. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted risks (odds), respective 95% confidence intervals, and probability (p‐value) of developing peri‐implantitis and mucositis. All analyses were performed using SAS for Windows Software (Version 9.4, SAS Institute). All statistical tests were applied to 2 sails, and values were considered significant if the calculated probability was <0.05. The following two types of analyses were performed: the first analyzed the variables individually in the entire study population and the other in the population divided into two groups according to the type of implant‐prosthetic rehabilitation performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

hTAS2R38 Genotypes and Food Consumption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The food consumptions were energy adjusted using the residual method (Willett 2012 ), which is an established and a widely used method in nutritional epidemiology to enable the investigation of the quality, rather than the quantity, of foods in the diet. Energy-adjusted intake variables were computed as the residuals from the regression model, with total energy intake as the independent and the food consumption as the dependent variable. Multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) models were used to investigate the group differences in food consumption between the AVI/AVI and PAV/PAV genotypes, and an additive linear regression analysis was carried out to examine the allele-specific effects of the hTAS2R38 genotypes. All models were adjusted for age, and the multivariate models were further adjusted for total energy and body mass index (BMI). The women and men were studied separately. All statistical analyses were performed with the SAS for Windows software package version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gene expression of TLR2, TLR4, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10 and TGF-β was compared using ANOVA in repeated-measurement design on time, followed by an adjusted Tukey's test for multiple comparisons when the data presented a normal distribution. In the case of a non-normal distribution of data on TLR2, TLR4, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, TGF-β and IL-17 levels in patients and controls, the same design was fitted using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution. Differences in values for sputum smears between groups of patients were assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-test All of the analyses were performed using SAS for Windows software, V.9.2. The results were considered significant when p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Primary Patency of Endovascular Intervention

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient and lesion characteristics and clinical outcome measures are summarized with descriptive statistics. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation; categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages.
A sample size of 57 patients was enrolled to provide statistical power >80% to assess the primary patency performance goal of 75%, justified by expected primary patency of 90%, a performance margin of 15%, a 1-sided alpha of 5%, and 20% attrition rate. The 9-month primary patency was defined as a success if the lower bound of the exact 95% confidence interval (CI) was greater than the prespecified performance goal of 75%. Kaplan-Meier estimates were plotted for primary patency through 12 months, and standard errors were calculated using the Society for Vascular Surgery standard.16 (link) All statistical analyses were performed with the SAS for Windows software (version 9.3 or higher; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ECG Data Analysis and Correlation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis on ECG data and the relevant correlation with treatment plasma concentrations were performed at eResearch Technology (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) using SAS for Windows software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) version 9.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating HHCR Treatment Efficacy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as medians or the means ± standard deviations (SDs) for continuous variables and as numbers with percentages in parentheses for categorical variables. The primary positive outcome in the study would be an improvement in the SGRQ score and BSS after 12 weeks of HHCR treatment. Changes from baseline to the endpoints were analyzed using the paired t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS for Windows software (9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A value of p < 0.05 was considered to denote significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Demographic Trends in Age Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviations and medians. Categorical variables are shown as frequencies and percentages (%). Significant differences between age groups were determined by the Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square tests. The significance of trends was assessed by the Cohran-Armitage test. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were carried out using the SAS for Windows software package, ver. 9.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Prognostic Significance of Slug Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical data are presented as quantity and proportion. Pearson’s χ2 test for categorical variables and Student’s t test for unpaired data for continuous variables were performed to compare clinicopathological characteristics among the three Slug expression groups. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method, with the date of gastrectomy as the starting point. Patients who were alive were censored at the time of the last follow-up. Differences in survival were examined by the log-rank test. Multivariable analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model with a backward stepwise selection procedure. All analyses were performed by SAS for Windows software (version 8.02, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Dry Eye Prevalence and LASIK Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to the results of the Hong Kong study [10] , 15.6% of the patients had subjective dry eye symptoms before LASIK. A simple random sampling equation was used to calculate the sample size as n (required sample size) = Z 2 (p) (1 -p)/(B × p 2 ), p = 0.156, B = 0.20, Z = 1.96 (when significance level was 0.05). As a result, n equals 520. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS for Windows software (Version 9.4). The χ 2 test or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to determine whether there was a significant difference in dry eye symptoms and test results between the 2 groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pharmacokinetic Interactions with Danshen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical comparisons between control and drug treatments were initially performed by two-way ANOVA for repeated measures performed with SAS for Windows software (version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc.). For the ANOVA analyses of treatment effect with P < 0.05, post hoc a priori comparisons were performed between control and the treatment with the paired t-tests. Tmax⁡ was analyzed using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were constructed for the ratios of with- to without-danshen treatment using the log-transformed data for the geometric means of Cmax⁡, AUC0–24, AUC0–, t1/2, and CL/F. The resulting confidence limits were transformed by exponentiation and reported on the original measurement scale. The statistical limits were set at 0.80–1.25. The DAS statistical analysis system (version 1.0) was also used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!