The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti mouse f4 80 antibody

Manufactured by BioLegend
Sourced in United States

The Anti-mouse F4/80 antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and analysis of the F4/80 antigen, which is expressed on the surface of mouse macrophages. This antibody can be used in various immunological techniques, such as flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting, to identify and study macrophage populations in mouse biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using anti mouse f4 80 antibody

1

Isolation and Immunostaining of Liver Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-parenchymal cells from mouse liver were isolated by 2-step collagenase perfusion (24 (link)). Macrophage positive selection from non-parenchymal cells was performed using QuadroMACS column separation Kit (Miltenyi Biotech, Cambridge, MA). Anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) and specific microbeads were used according to the manufacture’s instruction. After the column separation of macrophages, cytospin was performed. Cells were centrifuged at 500 rpm for 5 minutes on glass slides followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes. Rat Anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC) was used for immunofluorescent staining as described elsewhere (25 (link)).
Additional methods in online supplement
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Histological Characterization of NASH in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice (N = 5) were euthanized at 2 and 42 days post-PFC injection for correlative histology. Samples were either fixed for staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), or fresh-frozen in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) freezing medium for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. For fixation, mice were perfused transcardially with saline followed by 10% neutral buffered formalin, and excised livers were stored in formalin for 72 h and then transferred to 70% ethanol. Samples for IHC were harvested fresh, rinsed in cold PBS, and then embedded in OCT and frozen at − 80 °C.
The NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) scoring system [19 (link)] was used for evaluation of steatosis and steatohepatitis in mouse livers. Hepatocellular steatosis (scale 0–3), lobular inflammation (scale 0–3), and ballooning (scale 0–2) were scored using the H&E slides by a pathologist blinded to treatment. Anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (Clone 8, BioLegend, San Diego, CA) was used to identify macrophages by IHC. Localization of macrophages with the fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled PFC nanoemulsion was performed using fluorescent micrographs by an independent histologist blinded to treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of Alveolar Macrophages from Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were infected with M.tb strains as described above, and mouse bronchoalveolar lavage was prepared as described previously (Gonzalez-Juarrero et al., 2003 (link)). Alveolar macrophages in bronchoalveolar lavage were further purified using Dynabeads Protein G (cat. 10003D; Invitrogen) conjugated with anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (cat. 123102; BioLegend). Cytosolic RNA and total cellular RNA were purified as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Purification of Colonic Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were isolated from colonic tissues according to a published protocol [57 (link)]. Briefly, the colon tissues were minced into a 1.5-cm pieces and washed with warm Ca2+ and Mg2+-free PBS. Afterward, the samples were treated with pre-warmed 2 mM EDTA in Ca2+ and Mg2+-free HBSS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 88,284) with 2% FBS for 20 min at 37°C to remove the epithelial layer. For digestion of intestinal tissue, the samples were digested in pre-warm collagenase VIII (Sigma‐Aldrich, C2139), DNAse I (Sigma‐Aldrich, 4,536,282,001) solution for 20 min at 37°C and then centrifuged at 250 × g for 5 min. For antibody staining, cell pellets were incubated in the flow cytometry staining buffer and incubated with 2.5 ug purified anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (Biolegend, 157,310) and anti-mouse PTPRC/CD45 (Biolegend, 103,155) for 30 min on ice. For storing, 3 × 105 cells were isolated and washed once with PBS and then sorted by a BD FACSAria Fusion Flow cytometer. All data and figures were analyzed and created using the FlowJo Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Nanoparticle-Based Therapies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SnMP, DNR hydrochloride, poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid) (PLGA, lactide: glycolide 50:50, 7000–17000 Da), and biotin‐FITC were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 1,2‐Dipalmitoyl‐sn‐glycero‐3‐phosphocholine (DPPC) and 1,2‐distearoyl‐sn‐glycero‐3‐phosphoethanolamine‐N‐[biotinyl(polyethylene glycol)‐2000] (DSPE‐PEG2000‐Biotin), 1,2‐distearoyl‐sn‐glycero‐3‐phosphoethanolamine‐N‐[amino(polyethylene glycol)‐2000] (DSPE‐PEG2000) were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. (Alabaster, AL, USA). Anti‐human CD33, CD64 antibodies and anti‐mouse CD11b, CD45, CD206, Ly6c, Gr1, TNF‐α, IL12p70, Rat IgG1 Isotype antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (USA) (Table 1, Supporting Information). Anti‐mouse F4/80 antibody and Avidin‐FITC were purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti‐human CCR2 antibody was obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Anti‐His‐Tag, anti‐human HO1 (P249), and β‐actin antibodies (13E5) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Macrophage Characterization in Glrx Knockout Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glrx knockout (KO) mice were generated by Dr. Y-S. Ho (Wayne State University, MI) [28 (link)]. Homozygous Glrx KO and genetically-matched wild type (WT) control mice were transferred and bred in the Laboratory Animal Science Center (LASC) on the Boston University Medical Campus as approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Boston University. Mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation according to a protocol approved by Boston University Animal Care and Use Committee. Peritoneal macrophages were collected from WT and KO mice (8–10 months old) by injection of cold PBS containing glucose into the peritoneal cavity immediately after euthanasia and collection of peritoneal fluid. Cells from 4–5 mice were pooled and centrifuged at 1000 rpm, re-suspended in DMEM containing 10% FBS, and plated into 24 wells. After one hour, cells were washed with warm PBS to remove non-adherent cells and adherent cells were cultured in DMEM +10% FBS with penicillin-streptomycin [29 (link)]. The following day the medium was changed, and cells were treated with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 6 hours followed by RNA extraction. Before LPS stimulation an aliquot of cells was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (BioLegend). F4/80 positive cells assessed by Image J of total cell number which was counted by Hoechst staining,
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PDTC Modulates Inflammatory Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) and ATP were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Nigericin was purchased from Tocris (Bristol, UK). Salmonella typhimurium flagellin and poly (dA:dT) were purchased from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-phospho-IκB, anti-phospho-NF-κB (p65), anti-IL-6, and anti-COX-2 antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The anti-IL-1β antibody was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Anti-NLRP3 and anti-caspase-1 antibodies were purchased from AdipoGen Life Science (San Diego, CA, USA). The anti-β-actin antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). The anti-mouse F4/80 antibody was purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Analysis of Liver NPCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non‐parenchymal cells (NPCs) were isolated from whole livers (sham) or ischaemic lobes (I/R) following 12 hours of reperfusion. Cells were stained with antimouse F4/80 antibody (BioLegend), Ly6G (BioLegend) and CD11b (BioLegend) to detect neutrophils and macrophages infiltration according to the manufacturer's protocol. We defined Kupffer cells as CD11b+F4/80+ and neutrophils as CD11b+Ly6G+. After 30 minutes incubation at 37°C in the dark, suspensions were washed with PBS and suspended with 300 μL PBS. Samples were determined and sorted by FAC‐SCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), and the data were analysed with Flow Jo (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Assessing Tumor Immune Response to Combination Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 12 mice excluded from the antitumor study were divided into 4 groups (control, mogamulizumab, PUVA and their combination groups) and treated with mogamulizumab and PUVA the day after grouping. Grouping and treatment were conducted in the same way as described above. Approximately 24 h after treatment, mice were euthanized, and the tumour tissues were collected and stored in 10% formalin neutral buffered solution.
Samples were embedded in paraffin and sectioned. One section was stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) by a standard procedure, and the other two sections were stained with monkey‐absorbed anti‐human IgG heavy and light chain antibody (Bethyl Laboratories) or anti‐mouse F4/80 antibody (BioLegend) as the primary antibody, followed by staining with anti‐goat IgG or anti‐rat IgG as the secondary antibody, respectively, and 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (DAB). The sections were examined microscopically to observe any morphological changes or the distribution of mogamulizumab and F/80‐positive monocytes and macrophages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!