The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prismafit scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Prismafit scanner is a laboratory equipment used for scanning and capturing high-quality digital images. It is designed to provide reliable and accurate scanning results for a variety of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using prismafit scanner

1

High-Resolution Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MRI data were collected using a 3T Siemens Prisma_Fit scanner with a 20-channel phased-array head coil at the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lab, South China Normal University, Guangdong, China. A gradient echo-planar imaging sequence was used with the following parameters: slice thickness = 3 mm, interslice gap = 1 mm, echo time (TE) = 30 ms, repetition time (TR) = 2,000 ms, flip angle = 90°, matrix size = 64 × 64, field of view = 192 mm, and 32 axial slices that covered the whole brain. The T1-weighted three-dimensional structural images were acquired by using a magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo sequence, TE = 2.52 ms, TR = 2,530 ms, flip angle = 7°, and voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Neuroimaging: Structural and Functional

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We acquired structural (T1-weighted) and functional BOLD images with a 3T Siemens Prisma_fit scanner. Structural data were acquired first, followed by 4 runs of BOLD data acquisition. The parameters of structural scanning were as follows: Resolution (1 × 1 × 1 mm3), TR (2,530 ms), TE (2.98 ms), TI (1,100 ms), flip angle (7 deg), acceleration factor PE (2), slice per slab (192), FoV read (256 mm). The parameters of functional scanning were as follows: Resolution (2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm3), TR (1,000 ms), TE (30 ms), flip angle (73 deg), acceleration factor slice (4), slices (56), FoV read (195 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Longitudinal Brain Imaging of PLWH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All imaging was conducted on either a Siemens TIM Trio 3-Tesla MRI
scanner with a 12-channel head coil or Siemens Prisma fit 3-Tesla scanner with a
64-channel head coil. In order to mitigate measurement error across head coils,
participants who switched scanner from baseline to follow-up were not included
in the study. We acquired 3D-T1-weighted Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient
Echo (MP-RAGE) sequences (240×256 matrix; FOV =256 mm; 160 slices; voxel
size =1.0 ×1.0 ×1.0mm3; TR =2300 ms; TE =2.98 ms; flip
angle =9°). Quality assurance was performed by visually inspection.
Images with excessive motion or image artifact and subsequently excluded.
Acquisition parameters were near identical on the Siemens Prisma Fit scanner,
but acquired with a 64-channel head coil. Cross-sectional volume extraction and
longitudinal analyses consisted of using a framework previously
described.21 (link) A single
group template was created using a mix of PLWH and uninfected controls for final
target registration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Functional Connectivity Mapping of Brain Networks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants undergo whole brain MRI on a Siemens 3 Tesla Prisma Fit Scanner with a 64-channel coil to collect 3D-T1 Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE) sequences (1.0x1.0x1.0mm3 (link)) and rs-fc scan at resting state with eyes open. We will calculate functional connectivity strength within networks from 2 six-minute blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) rs-fc MRI scans wherein the participant is asked to rest quietly in the scanner with eyes open and without falling asleep. T-1 isometric structural scans are used for co-registration.50 (link),93 (link),94 (link) The BOLD time-series will be extracted from a total of 36 previously defined seeds constituting the DMN and SAL networks as well as the dorsal attention (DAN), executive control (CON), and sensorimotor (SMN) networks.93 (link) Relationships between each of the 36 seeds will be calculated by constructing 36x36 cross-correlation matrices and Fisher z-transforming the resulting correlation values.50 (link) DMN and SAL data will be summarized as composite scores representing mean intra-network functional connectivity. A whole-brain analysis will then be performed on the entire matrix of pairwise relationships to explore treatment effects in other functional brain systems.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Longitudinal Neuroimaging Study of Cognitive Aging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For this case study, the patient completed the following over the course of one month: a neurological consultation, a neuropsychological evaluation, and a brain MRI on a research-dedicated 3T Siemens Prismafit scanner with a 32-channel head coil, acquiring: T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo sequence, T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequence, T2-weighted susceptibility weighted imaging, DTI, and FBI. Total scan time was 1 hour and 50 seconds (see Supplementary Material for acquisition parameters and image analysis procedures). Her images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist, who had the patient’s scans from one, three, and six years prior for comparison.
Prior clinical and research data are also summarized here. Specifically, clinical evaluations from neurology, neuroradiology, and neuropsychology were reviewed from 6 years prior (when the participant was age 68), and neuropsychological test results from another research study was reviewed from 3 years prior (when the participant was 71) in which an author (A. B.) was the principal investigator. This case study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Medical University of South Carolina. The control FBI data were obtained from a separate IRB-approved study. Both were compensated for their participation in research.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Shoulder MRI Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In addition to the clinical evaluation, the athletes underwent noncontrast MRI
scans of both shoulders at our research MRI facility with the use of 3.0-T
scanners (PRISMA-Fit scanner; Siemens) and a dedicated shoulder phased-array
coil. Table 1describes the imaging sequences used in the study. After the completion of the
MRIs, the images were blindly reviewed by 2 board-certified radiologists
specialized in musculoskeletal radiology with extensive experience in reading
shoulder MRIs (D.F., T.M.). Data from the reviews were recorded on a
standardized form evaluating the following 7 areas for each side: joint fluid,
bone marrow signal, rotator cuff tendon, biceps tendon,
superior/anterior/posterior/inferior labrum, AC joint, and determination of
whether chondral injuries of the glenohumeral joint were present. Three months
later, both radiologists, blinded to their previous readings, reviewed the MRIs
for a second time and recorded their findings on a new standardized form. Thus,
there were 4 interpretations for each MRI.
Regarding overall prevalence, a finding at a given shoulder site and side was
considered positive for abnormality if at least 3 of the 4 interpretations (ie,
>50%) were classified as positive; otherwise, a negative finding was
recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Resting-state fMRI Acquisition Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For 46/55 TLE patients and 8/16 controls, we used a Siemens 3T Magnetom PrismaFit scanner. rs-fMRI data were acquired during a 9-min interval with an axial, 72-slice gradient echo-planar sequence, TE/TR=37/800ms, with a 2mm isotropic voxel size (protocol 1). For the remaining 9/55 TLE patients and 8/16 controls of the Penn cohort, we used a Siemens 3T Magnetom Trio scanner. For this subset of patients, resting-state fMRI data were acquired during a 6-min interval with an axial, 72-slice gradient echo-planar sequence, TE/TR=37/800ms, with a 2mm isotropic voxel size (protocol 2). High-resolution T1-weighted images, with a sagittal, 208-slice MPRAGE sequence, TE/TR=2.24/2400ms, with a 0.8mm isotropic voxel size were acquired in all participants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Auditory Localizer and Repetition Adaptation fMRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI data were acquired on a 3.0 Tesla Siemens Prisma-fit scanner. We used whole-head echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences (flip angle = 70°, echo time [TE] = 35 ms, field of view [FOV] = 205 mm, 102 × 102 matrix) with a 64-channel head coil. Building off other auditory localizer (Damera et al., 2021 (link)) and RA paradigms (Chevillet et al., 2013 (link)), a slow (repetition time [TR] = 9,000 ms, acquisition time [TA] = 1,680 ms) and a fast (TR = 3,360 ms, TA = 1,680 ms) clustered acquisition paradigm were used for the auditory localizer and RA scans, respectively. Fifty-four axial slices were acquired in descending order (thickness = 1.8 mm, 0.18 mm gap; in-plane resolution = 2.0 × 2.0 mm2). A T1-weighted MPRAGE (magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo) image (resolution 1 × 1 × 1 mm3) was also acquired for each subject.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparing B0 Shim Techniques for Water Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before building a B0 shim module to incorporate into the automated protocol, three different B0 shim techniques were compared: Siemens-provided Advanced shim (double-echo steady state sequence (12 )) and “Brain” mode shim (gradient-echo sequence) and the FAST(EST)MAP (FM) protocol (13 (link)). Five healthy participants (32±10 years old, 4 females) gave informed consent approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board prior to the scan. Water signal was measured using sLASER (8 (link)) from six different VOIs on a 3T Siemens Prismafit scanner running Syngo VE11C. Water peaks were post-processed offline using MRspa (14 ): eddy-current corrected followed by measurement of their linewidth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

High-resolution T1-weighted MRI Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All MR Images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Prisma-fit scanner with a standard 32 channel head coil located at Southwest University. High-resolution T1-weighted (T1w) structural image was obtained using a three-dimensional gradient sequence in order to facilitate alignment of individual subject images into a common space: repetition time (TR) = 2530 ms, time of echo (TE) = 2.98 ms, field of view (FOV) = 256 × 256 mm2, thickness = 1 mm, voxel size = 0.5 × 0.5 × 1 mm3, flip angle = 7°, resolution matrix = 256 × 256, slices = 192, slice oversampling = 33.3 %, phase encoding direction = AC » PC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!