The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistical 22

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics 22.0 is a comprehensive statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a wide range of analytical tools for data management, visualization, and advanced statistical analysis. The software is designed to help users collect, analyze, and interpret data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using spss statistical 22

1

GABAA Receptor Modulation Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS statistical 22 software. Data were expressed in mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between two groups were performed using one sample unpaired t-test, whereas comparisons between multiple groups were conducted using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The GABAA receptor current in response to drug treatment and the control GABA assessment (20 μM) were adjusted for data obtained after an electrophysiological examination. Further, we calculated the enhancement drug ratio to the GABAA receptor current. The values of *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 were considered statistically significant. The GraphPad Prism 8.4 software was used for image plotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of Genetic Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistical 22 software. For normally distributed metrics, data were represented as mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD), and one‐way ANOVA analysis was used to compare means between groups. Count data were expressed as constituent ratios or rates (%), and group comparisons were made using χ2 tests. p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance in differences.
The main observation indicators are the proportion of embryos carrying homozygous mutations, heterozygous mutations, and pathogenic CNVs, as well as the number of transplantable embryos, comparing the success rate and accuracy of NGS, SNP array, Sanger sequencing, and Gap‐PCR. The secondary observation indicators include the distribution of female ages and their relationship with the number of harvested blastocysts, as well as the success rate of transplantation, clinical pregnancy rate, and healthy child birth rate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Epidemiological Trends of Microbial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were presented as percentages. The comparison between 2012–2016 isolates and 2017–2021 isolates was analyzed by logistic regression or Fisher’s exact test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyzes were performed using SPSS statistical 22.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We express all experimental data as the mean value ± standard deviations in triplicate. We analyzed all variance in the data (one-way ANOVA) using the IBM SPSS statistical 22.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). We defined p values < 0.05 as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Clinical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical, laboratory, and meteorology data were recorded in a Microsoft Excel database (Microsoft, Richmond, US). For continuous variables, non-normally distributed variables were expressed as medians and ranges; for categorical variables, data were presented as percentages. The differences between the two groups were determined by using the Wilcoxon Manne-Whitney U test for quantitative data and Fisher’s exact test for qualitative data, respectively. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS statistical 22.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Epidemiological Surveillance of Non-typhoidal Salmonella

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical, laboratory and meteorology data were recorded in a Microsoft Excel database (Microsoft, Richmond, US). For continuous variables, normally distributed continuous data were presented as means ± standard deviations (SDs), and non-normally distributed variables were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs); for categorical variables, data were presented as percentages. The comparison between iNTS and non-iNTS infections was calculated by logistic regression analysis; however, when zero observation was contained for a particular variable of one group, the P value was calculated with a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test instead. The Mann-Whitney test was used for the comparison of median age (non-normally distributed data) between iNTS and non-iNTS infections. Inter-annual linear trends of drug resistance were assessed by linear regression analysis. The numbers of NTS infection between every two seasons were compared using the chi-square test (categorical variables). The number of NTS infection cases and rainfall and temperature were examined by Spearman’s rank coefficient test. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical 22.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Analysis of Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were processed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) and ImageJ software version 1.50i (National Institute of Health), and the measurement data were analyzed as the mean ± standard deviation using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test with SPSS Statistical 22.0 software (IBM, Corp.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All assays were repeated three times independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Analysis of Treatment Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data are presented as the means ± standard errors (SEs). The data were analyzed by independent sample t-test using the IBM SPSS statistical 22.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences in the means between groups at the same time point were compared. Asterisks (* and **) were used to represent significant differences at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chromatographic Fingerprint Similarity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analysed and evaluated by a similarity evaluation system for the chromatographic fingerprint of TCM (2012, China), which was recommended by SFDA [31 ]. The similarity among different chromatograms was quantified by calculating the correlative coefficient. The similarity between the samples was acquired by computing the correlation coefficients of different chromatograms. R language conducts HCA according to the similarity degree of each component among different samples. IBM SPSS Statistical 22.0 software (IBM, New York, USA) applies the square Euclidean distance computing of the content of each component in the sample to perform HCA. HCA based on R language and SPSS distinguish herbal species. In order to verify the feasibility of QAMS, the other five active components in dandelion samples were determined by applying cichoric acid as an internal reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!