The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using za 0508

1

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After deparaffinization, rehydration, and washing of the 5‐μm sections, endogenous peroxidase was blocked (3% H2O2 for 10 minutes), and microwave antigen retrieval was undertaken in Tris‐EDTA (pH 9.0). The sections were first incubated with blocking serum at room temperature for 30 minutes and with a mouse anti‐IDO1 mAb (4.16H1 Ab, 1:1000; a kind gift from Benoit J. Van den Eynde), a rabbit anti‐CD8 Ab (SP16 Ab, 1:100; #ZA‐0508, ZSGB‐BIO, Beijing, China), a rabbit anti‐CD34 mAb (EP373Y Ab, 1:100; #ab81289, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), a mouse anti‐DC‐LAMP mAb (104G4 Ab, 1:50; #DDX0190A546‐100, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA), a rabbit anti‐CD68 polyclonal Ab (1:100; #25747‐1‐AP, ProteinTech Group), a mouse anti‐CD4 Ab (UMAB64 Ab; #ZA‐0418, ZSGB‐BIO, Beijing, China), or a rabbit anti‐NCAM1/CD56 polyclonal Ab (1:400; #14255‐1‐AP, ProteinTech Group) at 4°C overnight. The second incubation was carried out using a goat anti‐mouse/rabbit Ab and visualized with DAB, following counterstaining with hematoxylin after serial rinsing. The observation and images acquisition of these sections were carried out by advanced research microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Lymphocyte Infiltration in Rectal Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Previous studies have defined four components of lymphocyte reaction, including peritumoral lymphocytic reaction, Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction, IPL, and TIL [15 (link)]. Limited by the size and depth of pretherapeutic biopsy samples, peritumoral lymphocytic reaction and Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction could not be evaluated in most cases. Therefore, we investigated the other two components: IPL, defined as lymphocyte in tumor stroma within tumor mass; and TIL, defined as lymphocyte on top of cancer cells.
Tissue sections from all rectal-cancer cases were examined by two pathologists unaware of other data. For this study, slides were available for 134 cases for immunohistochemistry staining with CD4 and CD8 [CD4 (1:250, ZA0519; ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China) and CD8 (1:500, ZA0508; ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China)] (Supplementary Figure 1). CD4+ (Figure 1A–F) and CD8+ T-cells (Figure 1G–N) were counted at five random fields at 400× magnification and analysed in quantiles. Limited by the size of pretherapeutic biopsy samples, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were counted at three random fields for two cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiplex Immunohistochemistry for Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiplex staining was performed using the Opal 4-Color Manual IHC Kit (NEL810001KT) with the anti-CD3 (1:150; ZA-0508, ZSGB-BIO), anti-CD20 (1:100; ZM-0039, ZSGB-BIO), anti-CCL4 (1:50, PA5-23681, ThermoFisher), anti-CD8 (1:100, ab4055, abcam), anti-PNAD (1:100, #120801, Biolegend), anti-PD1(1:100, ab52587, Abcam) and anti-CD103 (1:100, ab254017, Abcam) antibodies with subsequent visualization with fluorescein AF-690 (1:75), AF-520 (1:75) and AF-570 (1:50). The nuclei were counterstained with 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (1:3,000). All sections were covered with Vectashield Hardset 895 mounting media, and scanned using the Vectra slide scanner (PerkinElmer).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CCL23 and CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin sections were deparaffinized, dehydrated, and antigen retrieved. The sections were blocked by 5% goat serum for 1 hour to reduce nonspecific background staining and incubated with primary antibody against CCL23 (abcam #ab171751) or CD8 (ZSGB‐BIO #ZA‐0508) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the sections were rinsed with TBS, treated with 3% H2O2 to block endogenous peroxidase activity, incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody, and visualized by using a DAB Kit (ZSGB‐BIO #ZLI‐9018). Immunostaining degree of each sample was scored based on staining intensity (intensity score: 0, no staining; 1, weak staining; 2, intermediate staining; 3, strong staining) and proportion of positive cells (extent score: 0, < 5%; 1, 5%‐25%; 2, 26%‐75%; 3, 75%‐100%). The final immunoreactivity score of CCL23 expression for each case is the product of the intensity score and the extent score. The counts for CD8+ T cells represent an average number of positively stained cells within three random intratumor areas under a 20X objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence Profiling of Kidney Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded kidney tissue sections were used for immunohistochemistry. Briefly, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies to CD3 (1:100, ab5690, Abcam, USA), CD4 (ZM-0418, ZSGB-Bio, China) and CD8 (ZA-0508, ZSGB-Bio, China) overnight at 4 °C and then analyzed with streptavidin peroxidase detection system (Maixin Technology Co., Ltd., China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Immunofluorescence staining was performed to localize the expression of CCL21 and CD3 with tissue sections using anti-CCL21 (1:100, AF366, R&D Systems, USA) and anti-CD3 (1:100, ab5690, Abcam, USA) antibodies in a chamber overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with fluorescein-labeled secondary antibodies (Invitrogen, USA) for 1 h. DAPI was used for cell nuclei staining. Immuno-stained samples were visualized using a confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Lymphocyte Infiltration in Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The density of the lymphocyte infiltration in tumors was assessed by pathologist. A condition that is characterized by prominent lymphocytic infiltration was defined as high-lymphocyte infiltration; otherwise it was defined as low-lymphocyte infiltration (2 (link), 18 (link)). The staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol with the CD8 marker (ZSGB-BIO, ZA-0508). In brief, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies to CD8 (1:100) overnight at 4°C and then analyzed with streptavidin peroxidase detection system (Maixin Technology Co., Ltd., China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Staining of PD-L1, CD8, and p16

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1, CD8, and p16 (as a surrogate of HPV infection)20 (link),21 (link) were stained using a standard protocol as previously described.22 (link) Briefly, freshly cut formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens were dewaxed in xylene, hydrated in graded alcohol, and washed in phosphate-buffered saline; after neutralizing endogenous peroxidase (0.3% H2O2 for 10 min), the microwave antigen retrieval method was applied using Tris–EDTA (pH 9.0). Subsequently, the slides were preincubated with blocking serum and then were incubated overnight at 4°C with each primary antibody: p16 (1:100, ZM0205; ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, People’s Republic of China), CD8 (1:100, ZA0508, ZSGB-BIO), and PD-L1 (1:100, #13684; Cell Signaling Technology, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China). Once the above procedure was completed, the sections were serially rinsed, incubated with secondary antibodies, visualized using diaminobenzidine, and counterstained with hematoxylin. Tonsil tissues were used as positive controls for PD-L1 and CD8, and cervical squamous cell carcinoma specimens were used as positive controls for p16 (Figure S1). Specimens of identical tissues stained without primary antibody were used as negative controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating CD8+ TILs in Pretreatment Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pretreatment biopsy samples were obtained before the initiation of nCRT. TILs were assessed by immunohistochemical staining of slides from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor blocks using mouse monoclonal antibodies against CD8 (1:100, ZA0508; ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). For each slide, three random fields were chosen for the enumeration of CD8+ TIL within the area where tumor cells were considered to be most strongly stained. Then, an average was reached and considered as the number of CD8+ TIL per field. The density of TILs was defined as the number of positive CD8 lymphocytes per square millimeter and was then graded as either “high” or “low” (cutoff=80/mm2). This cutoff value yielded a minimal “P-value” in the analysis of correlation with pCR and was thus applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tissue sections were subjected to IHC as previously described [23 (link)]. In brief, paraffin‐embedded sections were cut 4 μm thick, then deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigenic retrieval was processed with sodium citrate. The sections were then incubated in 3% H2O2 for 10 min, blocked in 1% BSA for 60 min followed by immunostaining using anti‐PD‐L1 mAb (Zsbio, Beijing, China, #ZM‐0381, clone UMAB199, 1 : 100 dilution), anti‐CD4 (Zsbio, #ZM‐0418, clone UMAB64, 1 : 75 dilution) and anti‐CD8 (Zsbio, #ZA‐0508, clone EP334, 1 : 75 dilution). The IHC images were quantified by a number of cells·mm−2. The most and least filtrated regions were defined as regions with maximum and minimum values, respectively, as determined by IHC quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Liver Cancer Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCC samples were fixed in neutral formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Then, they were cut into 4 µm sections. Immunohistochemistry was performed on these sections using previously described methods.
14 (link) The slides were stained with primary antibodies: CD63 (OTI2G6, OriGene), S100A9 (OIT3F8, OriGene), RPRD1B (OTI1C7, OriGene), ALOX5 (OTI3F1, OriGene), PD‐L1 (66248‐1‐Ig, Proteintech), HSF1 (67189‐1‐Ig, Proteintech), RAN (67500‐1‐Ig, Proteintech), XPO1/CRM1 (D6V7N, CST), MPO (ZA‐0197, ZSGB) and CD8 (ZA‐0508, ZSGB). The slides were then imaged under a light microscope (BX63, Olympus Microsystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!