The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

μclear imaging plates

Manufactured by Greiner
Sourced in Austria, Germany

μClear imaging plates are a type of laboratory equipment designed for cell-based assays and high-content screening applications. The plates feature a clear bottom that allows for optimal imaging and analysis of cell samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using μclear imaging plates

1

Automated Single-Cell Immunofluorescence Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence stainings were performed in 96-well μClear imaging plates (Greiner bio-one), documented and quantified on a single-cell level with the automated fluorescence microscope BD Pathway 855 using the software Attovision (BD Biosciences). Cells were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or, for DNA damage detection, in ice-cold methanol/acetone (1:1) for 15 min. PFA-fixed samples were washed two times with 0.1 M glycin in PBS and permeabilized in PBS with 0.1% NP-40 (each 5 min, RT). Blocking was performed in permeabilization buffer supplemented with 5% FBS for 1 h at room temperature (RT). Cells were incubated with primary antibodies (listed in Supplementary data) diluted in blocking buffer for 1 h at 37°C. After washing in blocking buffer, samples were incubated with fluorescent secondary antibodies in blocking buffer supplemented with DAPI (200 nM) for nuclear counterstain and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing in permeabilization buffer, cells were kept in PBS, imaged and quantified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated Microscopy of Interferon Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This technique was previously developed in our laboratory (Zhou et al, 2016). U2OS or MCA205 wild‐type cells were seeded at 8,000 cells per well in 96‐well μClear imaging plates (Greiner Bio‐One) and let adhere for 24 h. Next, cells were treated for 6 h and medium was changed for the following 24 h. Afterward, the supernatant of each condition was transferred on HT29 MX1‐GFP plated at 4,000 cells per well in 96‐well μClear imagine plates 2 days before. As an additional control, HT29 MX1‐GFP was treated with IFNα1 (752802, BioLegend). Forty‐eight hours later, the plates were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde supplemented with 1 μg/ml Hoechst 33342 for 1 h at room temperature. The fixative was exchanged to PBS, and the plates were analyzed by automated microscopy. The amount of GFP intensity in the whole cell was measured, and the number of positive cells was calculated based on a threshold set between the distribution of the GFP intensity in untreated cells and the one in IFNα1‐treated cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing Autophagy in U2OS Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human osteosarcoma U2OS cells stably expressing GFP-LC3 or RFP-GFP-LC3 (PMID 21151176) were seeded at 1500 cells/well in μClear imaging plates (Greiner BioOne, Kremsmünster, Austria) and left to adapt for 24 hours before adding BCG at a MOI of 10:1, 30:1, 100:1, and 300:1. Torin (Tocris) at 0.3 μM was used as a positive control for autophagy induction. After 6 hours of incubation, cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (w/v in PBS) containing 1 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 30 minutes. The fixative was then removed, the cells were overlaid with PBS, and the plates were sealed with adhesive aluminum tape. Images were acquired by means of an IXMc confocal automated bioimager (Molecular Devices) equipped with a ×20 PlanApo objective (Nikon). Images were processed with R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Automated High-Content Imaging Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in tissue culture-treated 384-well μClear imaging plates (Greiner BioOne, Frickenhausen, Germany) and incubated under standard tissue culture conditions during 24 h at 37 °C. Then, cells were treated with the indicated compounds and after 6 or 24 h of incubation, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution containing 1 μM Hoechst 33342 overnight at 4 °C. The fixative was changed to PBS, and the plates were subjected to automated image analysis. For automated fluorescence microscopy, a robot-assisted Molecular Devices IXM XL BioImager (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with Sola light sources (Lumencor, Beaverton, OR, USA), adequate excitation and emission filters (Semrock, Rochester, NY, USA), and a 16-bit monochromes sCMOS PCO.edge 5.5 camera (PCO, Kelheim, Germany) and a ×20 PlanAPO objective (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to acquire nine view fields/well, followed by image processing with the custom module editor of the MetaXpress software (Molecular Devices). For the latter, the images were segmented and analyzed for GFP, RFP granularity or global fluorescence intensity (depending on the dyes) by comparing the standard deviation of the mean fluorescence intensity of groups of adjacent pixels within the cytoplasm of each cell to the mean fluorescence intensity in the same ROI using the MetaXpress software (Molecular Devices).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was performed in 96-well μClear imaging plates (Greiner Bio-One). Cells were fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS or in ice-cold methanol/acetone (1:1) for 15 minutes. PFA-fixed samples were washed 2 times with 0.1 M glycine in PBS and permeabilized in PBS with 0.1% NP-40 (each 5 minutes, room temperature). Blocking was performed in permeabilization buffer supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking buffer for 1 hour at 37°C. After washing in blocking buffer, samples were incubated with fluorescent secondary antibodies in blocking buffer supplemented with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (200 nM) for nuclear counterstain and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing in permeabilization buffer, cells were kept in PBS, imaged, and quantified on a single-cell level with the automated fluorescence microscope BD Pathway 855 using the software Attovision (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Live-cell imaging of CALR-GFP and HMGB1-GFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One day before treatment, 2,500 U2OS cells stably co‐expressing either CALR‐GFP or HMGB1‐GFP with H2B‐RFP per well were seeded in 384‐well μClear imaging plates (Greiner Bio‐One) and let adhere. The next day, cells were treated and CALR‐GFP and HMGB1‐GFP cells were observed by live‐cell microscopy as described before with a frequency of image acquisition at one image per hour for 12 and 24 h, respectively. The images were segmented and analyzed with R using the EBImage and flowcatchR packages from the Bioconductor repository (https://www.bioconductor.org). H2B‐RFP was used to segment nuclei, and the obtained mask was either used to measure GFP intensity in the nuclear compartment (HMGB1‐GFP) or as a seed to segment the cytoplasmic compartment (CALR‐GFP). Then, a top‐hat filter was applied and the area of CALR‐GFPhigh regions was measured. HMGB1‐GFP nuclear fluorescence intensity of single cells tracked over time was normalized to its value at first time point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Dose-Dependent Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS wild‐type cells were seeded at 8,000 cells per well in 96‐well μClear imaging plates (Greiner Bio‐One) and let adhere for 24 h before treatment. Cells were treated with a large range of concentrations for 24 h and then stained by the addition of propidium iodide (P4864, Sigma‐Aldrich) at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml and Hoechst 33342 at 2 μg/ml for 30 min. Plates were centrifuged in order to bring detached cells to the focal plane and then, images were acquired by automated microscopy using adequate filter sets as described above. The images were segmented with R by means of the EBImage package. Nuclei were segmented based on Hoechst 33342 signal; then, nuclear area and fluorescence intensities (in DAPI and Cy3) were measured. The assessed parameters were used to cluster cells as healthy (normal‐sized, Hoechstlow, PI), pyknotic (condensed, Hoechsthigh, PI), or dead (PI+). The number of healthy cells was then used to establish dose–response models, by fitting the data points with a 4‐parameter log‐logistic model. The model was then used to calculate the IC60 (concentration for which 40% of cell population is healthy) for each drug.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!