The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Matrigel coated transwell chamber

Manufactured by Corning
Sourced in United States

Matrigel-coated Transwell chambers are a laboratory tool used for cell migration and invasion studies. The chambers consist of an upper compartment separated from a lower compartment by a porous membrane. The membrane is coated with Matrigel, a basement membrane-like matrix, which serves as a barrier to cell migration. This setup allows for the evaluation of a cell's ability to migrate through the Matrigel layer and into the lower compartment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

89 protocols using matrigel coated transwell chamber

1

Tumor Cell Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 600 μl medium containing tumor cells (HOS and U2OS) were added into the basolateral chamber of the Matrigel-coated Transwell chambers (Corning Costar, Tewksbury, MA, U.S.A.), and serum-free medium containing 5 × 104 tumor cells was added into the apical chamber. After 24-h culture at 37°C, with serum-free medium sucked away, cells attached to the upper surface of chamber were removed. The rest of cells was fixed with 100% methyl alcohol, and then stained with Crystal Violet. The number of cells invading Matrigel was counted in three random fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Invasion Assay with Matrigel Transwell

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell invasion assays were performed using Matrigel-coated Transwell chambers (8 μm pore size; Costar). A total of 100 μL transfected cell suspension (2 × 104 cells/mL) was added to the upper chamber of the Transwell plates. A total of 500 μL complete medium was added to the bottom chambers. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, nonmigrating cells were removed using cotton swabs. Cells that had permeated the Matrigel-coated membrane and migrated to the bottom were immobilized with paraformaldehyde and then stained with crystal violet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Migration and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wound-healing assay was used to detect cell migration in vitro. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates and reached confluence in 24h. A thin mark was drawn vertically with a pipette tip in the 6-well plate. Cells were then washed three times with PBS to remove the floating and detached cells. Fresh serum-free medium was added, and photos were taken at 0, 24, 48 and 96h to assess cell migration using a light microscope (Leica Corporation, Germany).
Cell invasion was assessed using Matrigel-coated Transwell chambers (Costar Inc., UK). Cells were initially cultured in serum-free medium for 12 h. A total of 1×105 (200 μl) cells were then plated in serum-free medium with BSA on 24-well Transwell inserts pre-coated with 40 μl Matrigel (1:4 dilution; BD Bioscience, CA). The lower chambers were filled with medium that contained 10% fetal bovine serum. After incubation for 24h (KYSE-150 cells) or 48 h (ECA-109 cells), the cells remaining in the upper chambers were scraped off, and the invading cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde and stained with crystal violet. The penetration of cells through the membrane was photographed under a microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Invasion and Wound Healing Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The invasion assay was performed using Matrigel-coated Transwell chambers (8-μm pore size; Corning Costar, Bodenheim, Germany), as previously described 16 (link). Briefly, cells (2×104) in 200µl serum-free DMEM were seeded into the upper part of the chamber, and 500 µl DMEM containing 15% FBS was added to the lower part of the chamber. Following 24 h of incubation, cells were fixed with 100% methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Cells on the lower side of the membrane were counted under a light microscope (Olympus BX41, Tokyo, Japan) at 100× magnification. For the wound healing assay, cells (1×105) were plated in 24-well plates and allowed to attach overnight. Scratch through the cell monolayer was introduced by using a 10 µl pipette tip. At the indicated times (0 and 24 h), images of the wound areas were captured under a microscope at 100× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Matrigel-Based Cell Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell invasion assay was performed using Matrigel-coated transwell chambers (8 μm pore size; Costar). A total of 100 μL transfected cell suspension (2 × 104 cells/mL) was added to the upper chamber of the transwell plates. A total of 500 μL complete medium was added to the bottom chambers. After incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, nonmigrating cells were removed using cotton swabs. The cells that permeated the Matrigel-coated membrane and migrated to the bottom were fixed using paraformaldehyde and then stained using crystal violet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assaying Cancer Cell Invasiveness and Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assay cell invasiveness, Matrigel-coated transwell chambers (Corning Costar) were used. Equal numbers of cells maintained in pH 7.4 or pH 6.5 were suspended in RPMI of each pH condition containing 1% FBS. Approximately 200 μL of the cell suspension was added to the upper portion of the insert, and medium containing 5% FBS was added to the lower portion of the inset. After 8 h (for AGS) and 18 h (for SNU601) of incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2, noninvasive cells were removed from the upper surface of the transwell membrane with a cotton swab, and the invaded cells on the lower layer surface were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and stained with crystal violet solution. The numbers of invaded cells were counted or imaged under high-power (×200) microscope magnification (Olympus). For the migration assay, cells incubated at pH 7.4 and pH 6.5 were sampled in the same manner as above and grown in 24-well plates in growth medium. After overnight culture, the middle of the cell surface was scraped with a micropipette tip to make a wound of constant width. Debris was washed out with PBS, and the wound closures were monitored and photographed at 6 h (AGS cells) and 18 h (SNU601 cells) under the microscope (× 100, Olympus). Migration distance was calculated applying the software program HMIAS-2000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Matrigel-Based Cell Invasion Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell invasion was evaluated by Matrigel-coated Transwell chambers (Corning-Costar, NY, USA). Briefly, cells were incubated in the upper chamber of a 24-well Transwell plate. After transfection for 48 h, 5 × 104 cells were seeded into the upper compartment, which contained RPMI1640 medium with 10% FBS. After 24 h incubation, non-invading cells were gently removed and the migrated cells were fixed with methanol followed by DAPI staining. The number of invaded cells was counted under light microscope (Nikon, ECLIPSE Ts2, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transwell Migration and Wound Healing Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell invasion was analyzed with Matrigel-coated transwell chambers (Costar, Corning, NY, USA). Cell migration was tested using transwell chambers without Matrigel and wound healing assay. For transwell assay, CAL27 and SCC25 cells (1 × 104 for migration assay, 3 × 104 for invasion analysis) in serum-free DMEM were plated into the superior chambers, whereas the lower chamber was supplemented with 500 μL DMEM with 10% serum. 24 h upon incubation, migrated or invasive cells were spotted with 0.1% crystal violet, and examined under a microscope (× 100 magnification, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with at least 6 random fields.
For wound healing assay, 2 × 105 CAL27 and SCC25 cells after various transfections were placed into each well of 6-well plates until 80% of confluency was reached. Next, a “wound” was made using a 200 μL pipette tip, and cells were allowed to migrate for additional 24 h. The images (× 100 magnification) at 0 and 24 h were recorded. Relative migratory rate was calculated by the formula: (si-circ_0011946(wound area)0h)-(si-circ_0011946(wound area)24h)/(si-NC(wound area)0h)-(si-NC(wound area)24h).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Invasion and Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell invasion assay, HCT116 and HT29 cells transfected with pCDNA3.1-DNM3 for 24 hrs were seeded into Matrigel-coated transwell chambers (8 μm pore size;Costar, Corning, NY, USA) with a total of 2.5×104 cells in 500 μLof medium. The lower chambers received 500 μL of medium containing 10% FBS. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. Residual cells on the upper surface of transwell membranes were removed. The invaded cells on the lower surface were fixed with methanol, stained by 0.1% crystal violet and imaged using phase contrast microscopy. Cell number was counted in five random fields of view. The cell migration assay was performed in the same way, but without matrigel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transwell Invasion Assay for Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transwell invasion assays, Caski and Caski/Taxol cells were plated atop Matrigel-coated transwell chambers with 8 μm pores (Costar Corp.) in serum-free media after being cultured in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium for 48 h. In the bottom chamber, media supplemented with 10% FBS was added. A total of 72 h after cell plating, the transwell chamber was extracted and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in room temperature for 20 min, washed with PBS twice, and put into well with 400 μl Giemsa A solution for 1 min in room temperature; 800 μl Giemsa solution was added into the well for 5 min; the transwell chamber was extracted and washed with PBS twice. The cells in the upper chamber were cleared using clean cotton tips, the lower chamber was dried and moved to slides, and three fields were observed under microscope, and the average number of cells was calculated. Each treatment was assessed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!