The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

M8823

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

The M8823 is a laboratory equipment product offered by Merck Group. It is a precision instrument designed for conducting various scientific analyses and experiments. The core function of the M8823 is to provide accurate and reliable data collection and measurement capabilities for researchers and scientists working in a laboratory setting. Further details about the specific intended use or technical specifications of the M8823 are not available at this time.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using m8823

1

GATA3 and RUNX3 Transcription Factor Overexpression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human GATA3 or RUNX3 was inserted into pcDNA3.1 vector by PCR-based amplification. The cloning primers were as follows: RUNX3-FLAG F: 5′ AACTAGCTAGCATGGACTACAAAGACGATGACGACAAG atggcatcgaacagcatcttcg 3′; RUNX3-FLAG R: 5′ TTTGGCGCGCC tcagtagggccgccacac 3′; GATA3-HA F: 5′ AACTAGCTAGCATGTACCCATACGATGTTCCAGATTACGCT atggaggtgacggcgga 3′; and GATA3-HA R: 5′ TTTGGCGCGCC ctaacccatggcggtgacc 3′. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with any 2 combinations of the following plasmids: pcDNA3.1-RUNX3-FLAG, pcDNA3.1-GATA3-HA, and empty vector. After 48 hours, cells were harvested and lysed (cell lysis buffer, Cell Signaling Technology, catalog 9803). Cell lysates were incubated with mouse anti-FLAG magnetic beads overnight with gentle rocking in cold room (Sigma, catalog M8823); beads were washed several times using PBST (0.1% Triton X-100); and pellets were resuspended in 30 μL 3X or 6X SDS sample buffer, heated to 95–100°C for 5 minutes and spun down for Western blotting on 12%–15% SDS-PAGE gels. The following rabbit Abs were used: anti-HA, anti-RUNX3, and anti-GATA3 Ab (Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rapid Immunoprecipitation for Transient Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hsf1-3xFLAG-V5 was serially immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG (M8823; Sigma-Aldrich) and anti-V5 (M167-11; MBL) magnetic beads, and eluates were blotted for IP/Western blot analysis (Zheng et al., 2016 (link); Zheng and Pincus, 2017 (link)). For IP/MS of Sis1-3xFLAG and Hsf1-3xFLAG, the protocol was modified to only perform the anti-FLAG IP using a short incubation of the anti-FLAG beads with total lysate for 15 min before washing and eluting with 3xFLAG peptide. The short incubation was designed to increase the likelihood of capturing transient interactions while reducing nonspecific interactions. All IP experiments were performed in biological triplicate. Triplicate IPs were also performed on an untagged strain exposed to the same conditions to subtract background and calculate significance. Immunoblots were performed with anti-FLAG (M2, F1804; Sigma-Aldrich), anti-V5 (V5-10, V8012; Sigma-Aldrich), or anti-Ssa1/2 (rabbit polyclonal; gift from Elizabeth A. Craig, Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Lopez-Buesa et al., 1998 (link)) antibodies as indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Analysis of Organelle-Specific Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confluent HEK293T cells that stably expressing LAMP1-GFP-FLAGX3 (LGF) or STK11IP-GFP-FlagX3 (SGF) were rinsed with cold PBS, scraped, spun down, and resuspended in 750 μl of fractionation buffer: 140 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM Sucrose, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, supplemented with protease inhibitors. The cells were mechanically broken with a pellet pestle and were spun down at 1000 × g for 10 min to remove the nucleus and cell debris. The samples were then spun down at 20,000 × g for 25 min to yield the organelles pellets. The pellet was resuspended in the fractionation buffer and subject to IP with 100 μl of a 50% slurry of anti-FLAG magnetic beads (M8823, Sigma). Four hours later, beads were washed four times using the fractionation buffer, then eluted with 1% SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 U ml−1 universal nuclease), and the proteins were subjected to immunoblot or MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Yeast Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed as previously described [52] (link). In brief, 100 ml of exponentially growing yeast cultures were arrested with 20 µg/ml nocodazole for 3 h at room temperature and subsequently cross-linked with formaldehyde at a final concentration of 1%. The cross-linking reaction was stopped with glycine; the cells were harvested and lysed using Silica beads. Chromatin was sheared to 300–500 bp fragments by water-bath sonification (Bioruptor UCD-200, Diagenode). FLAG-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated using the monoclonal ANTI-FLAG antibody coupled to superparamagnetic beads (Sigma-Aldrich, M8823). DNA was recovered by phenol/chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the Light Cycler LC480 system (Roche) to evaluate the enrichment of analyzed proteins. The ratio of DNA-IP to DNA-Input was calculated for centromeric/pericentromeric regions (0.1 kb away from CEN1, 1.1 kb away from CEN4 and 5 kb away from CEN12) as well as for the rDNA locus (NTS1-2). The relative enrichment was calculated by normalization to the IP/Input ratio for a control locus on the arm of chromosome 10. Three independent immunoprecipitation experiments from metaphase-arrested cells were performed for FLAG-tagged Smc2 and Ipl1; Rts1 and Mcd1 ChIP experiments were performed twice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UV-Induced RNA Interactome Capture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tet-on HeLa cells expressing eGFP fusion proteins were generated as described elsewhere (Castello et al., 2012 (link)). Upon induction, cells were UV irradiated and subjected to small scale RNA interactome capture (Castello et al., 2013b (link)). Eluates were measured in a plate reader. For PNK assays, cell monolayers were irradiated with 150 mJ/cm2 UV254 (Castello et al., 2013b (link)). After cell lysis and RNase treatment, FLAG-HA tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody coupled to magnetic beads (M8823, Sigma Aldrich) and processed as in Beckmann et al. (2015) (link). More detailed information can be found in the Supplemental Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoprecipitation of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For worm samples, 30,000 young adult worms with the indicated genotype were washed off by M9 buffer and resuspended in 3 ml lysis buffer (50 mM tris-HCl pH 8.0, 137 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, proteinase inhibitor). Samples were homogenized with a glass homogenizer and sonicated. For HEK293T cells, cells in one 10 cm dish with 90% confluence were washed with 1X PBS buffer, then resuspended in 1 ml lysis buffer and sat on ice for 30 min. The worm or cell lysate was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was then transferred into a new tube and rotated at 4 °C overnight in the presence of the designated antibody anti-GFP antibody (Abcam #ab290, 1 µl per sample), anti-FLAG magnetic beads (Sigma #M8823, 40 µl per sample), anti-Myc magnetic beads (Bimake #B26302, 20 µl per sample). For anti-GFP immunoprecipitation, protein G beads (Invitrogen #10004D, 40 µl per sample) were subsequently added to each sample and rotated at 4 °C for additional 2 h. After binding, the beads were washed three times with lysis buffer and boiled in 50 µl 2X SDS Laemmli buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02% bromophenol blue, 0.125 M Tri-HCL, pH 6.8) at 95 °C for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mycelial Protein Extraction and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For preparation of the protein samples from mycelium, conidia (5 × 105 conidia/ml) of wild type and BagA::Flag strains were inoculated in 50 ml of liquid minimal media and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Mycelial samples were collected, freeze dried and stored at −80°C. Prepared mycelial samples were resuspended in lysis buffer B250 (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, and one Roche Complete Protease inhibitor tablet without EDTA per 50 ml) as previously described (Park et al., 2012 (link); Patananan et al., 2013 (link)), broken by a mini-bead beater for 2 cycles (1 min homogenization with 10 min sitting on ice) and centrifuged in a microcentrifuge for 15 min at 15,000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was incubated with anti-FLAG M2 magnetic beads and elution was performed according to manufacturer's protocol (M8823, Sigma). Total elution fractions were sent for sequencing and further processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomic Analysis of BEAF-32B Interactome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A P-element based transgenic fly line with an insulated FLAG-BEAF-32B-EGFP gene expressed from its endogenous promoter (Avva and Hart 2016 (link)) on the X chromosome was used to collect 4- to 20-h embryos. These flies also had the wild-type BEAF gene. Control embryos were collected from y1 w67c23 flies. Nuclear extracts were prepared as previously described (Zhao et al. 1995 (link)) and immunoprecipitations were done using anti-FLAG M2 coupled to magnetic beads according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma-Aldrich M8823). Two experimental and 3 control coimmunoprecipitation samples passed quality control (SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot for BEAF and silver stain for total protein) and were sent to the Thermo Fisher Scientific Center for Multiplexed Proteomics at Harvard Medical School for tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Differences between the experimental and control samples were evaluated for statistical significance by the Student’s t-test and corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Results are in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FLS were lysed in an immunoprecipitation lysis buffer containing a protease inhibitor. After centrifugation, the collected supernatant was incubated with magnetic beads (Sigma, M8823) at 4°C overnight. Then, the beads were rinsed, and the bound proteins were eluted and then evaluated using a Western blot assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Investigating SCRIB-ZDHHC7 Physical Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To test the physical interactions between SCRIB and ZDHHC7, Flag-SCRIB and HA-ZDHHC7 were co-transfected into HEK293A cells. ZDHHC7-interacting proteins were immunoprecipitated by anti-HA magnetic beads (88836, Thermal Scientific), and SCRIB was detected in the complex by western blot using anti-SCRIB antibody (sc-11049, Santa Cruz, 1:1000). Similarly, SCRIB-interacting proteins were immunoprecipitated by anti-Flag magnetic beads (M8823, Sigma-Aldrich), and ZDHHC7 was detected in the complex by western blot using anti-HA antibody (H3663, Sigma Aldrich, 1:1000). To validate the interactions between endogenous SCRIB and ZDHHC7, HEK293A cells was transfected with HA-ZDHHC7 construct or vector control, and the cell lysate was subjected to immunoprecipitation using anti-HA magnetic beads. Endogenous SCRIB was detected in the IP samples by western blot using anti-SCRIB antibody (sc-11049, Santa Cruz, 1:1000). To determine the domain requirements for SCRIB to interact with ZDHHC7, Flag-SCRIB full-length or truncation mutants and HA- ZDHHC7 were co-transfected into HEK293A cells. ZDHHC7-interacting proteins were immunoprecipitated by anti-HA magnetic beads (88836, Thermal Scientific), and anti-Flag antibody (F1804, Sigma Aldrich, 1:2000) was used to detect Flag-SCRIB truncations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!