The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss version 23.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

SPSS version 23.0 for Windows is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides tools for data analysis, data management, and data visualization. SPSS is designed to handle a wide range of data types and offers a variety of statistical techniques, including regression analysis, cluster analysis, and time series analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

125 protocols using spss version 23.0 for windows

1

Survival Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. OS was defined as the time from the starting day of the first-line chemotherapy to death. Data on survivors was censored as of the last follow-up. Differences between the survival curves were analyzed by the log-rank test. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the different groups for categorical variables. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the joint effects of several variables on survival and to assess interactions between treatment and subgroup in subgroup analyses. Factors with p values < 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in the Cox proportional hazards regression model. All statistical analyses were two-sided and performed with SPSS version 23.0 for Windows.
We used propensity score matching (PSM), the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching, to minimize the selection bias by adjusting variables that may affect the survival of patients. SPSS version 23.0 for Windows was also used for PSM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Occlusal Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analyses were performed by SPSS version 23.0 for windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The means, standard deviations (SD), and ranges of each item were calculated using standard descriptive statistics. Because ABO-OGS scores are discontinuous grading numbers, non-parametric tests such as Kruskal-Wallis were used to compare differences between groups. After the normality test, the T-Scan system results conformed to the normal distribution, so they were tested using one-way ANOVA tests, followed by a posthoc analysis using the least significant difference (LSD) test to compare the differences of the same item between different groups. The Spearman test was also applied to analyze the correlation between ABO-OGS parameters and T-Scan variables. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cognitive Assessment of BAFME Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are presented as means (± standard deviation), and categorical variables are shown as numbers (%). SPSS version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States) was used for calculation. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the severity (FTRS, UMRS) and the duration of the disease. Two-sample t-test was used to assess the cognitive difference between BAFME patients and unrelated healthy controls. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chronic Ankle Instability Biomechanical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All outcomes were analyzed using a normal analysis with a Shapiro–Wilk test. An unpaired t-test was used to compare the demographic information of the subjects between the CAI and healthy groups. The comparisons of the TMG value, mean normalized peak torque, mean normalized maximal work done, muscle thickness of the PL and TA between the CAI side and non-CAI side and healthy subjects were conducted using a one-factor ANOVA test. The effect sizes were calculated using eta-squared (η2) statistics and the post-hoc observed power was generated by G*Power 3.1 (Kiel University, Kiel, Germany). For the follow-up, a Tukey post-hoc analysis was carried out to statistically analyze the difference between the CAI side, non-CAI side and the healthy group. Cohen’s d statistics were calculated as the effect sizes for post-hoc comparisons. The significance level was defined at 5% (p < 0.05). SPSS version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for analyzing the data. A pre-study sample size was estimated from the Td of the PL of three legs in the CAI side (mean 18.66), three legs in the non-CAI side (mean 16.30) and three legs in the healthy group (mean 16.12) with an alpha level p < 0.05 and power of 0.8 using G*Power 3.1 because there was no previous study that used the TMG value of the PL as an outcome. A minimum of 33 subjects was calculated to be needed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Nasal TaperGuard ET Cuff Pressure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A pilot study using 10 volunteers showed that cuff pressure of nasal TaperGuard ET was increased by 6.5 ± 1.9 (mean ± standard deviation) cmH2O after head extension from neutral position. In this study the differences in the mean cuff pressure between two groups was 50% considered as significant and it was calculated that 23 patients in each group were required with α = 0.05 and β = 0.2. Considering a 10 % drop out rate, 26 patients in each group were required.
Statistical analysis was performed using statistical software (SPSS, version 23.0 for Windows; SPSS, Chicago, IL). Student’s t test was used for analysis of continuous data such as cuff pressure and distance from the carina to tube tip. Fisher’s exact test or chi-squared test was used for analysis of categorial data sch as postoperative airway complications and the incidence of cuff pressure more than 30 cmH2O. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Predictors of COVID-19 Sleep Disturbance and Suicidal Thoughts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive analysis was used to summarize the variables. Univariate logistic regression with crude odds ratios (cOR) was used to identify potential COVID-19-related factors associated with sleep disturbance and suicidal thoughts. Furthermore, all potential predictive variables identified from the first step were eligible for inclusion in the forward stepwise logistic regression models with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to determine the independent predictors for sleep disturbance and suicidal thoughts. All tests were examined using a two-tailed test with the alpha level set at <0.05. All data were processed using SPSS version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Factors Affecting Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables were described using numbers and percentages. For comparison between different groups, analysis of variances (one-way analysis of variance) test and independent sample t-test were used. The categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test. To analyze the significant parameters that affect outcome, univariate logistic regression analysis was applied, and using multivariate logistic regression, possible confounders were adjusted in different models. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All statistical tests were 2-sided and P-value of <.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Effects of Infrared Laser on Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data analyzed were from SPSS version 23.0 for Windows and the Kruskal-Wallis to determine whether there was a difference between treatments for gonadal maturity level parameters; if there were significant results, further tests were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. The parameters of the gonadosomal index and hepatosomal hepatic index are compared using the one-way ANOVA test, and the data is said to differ if the significance value is greater than p < 0.05. Using the Tukey method post hoc test; we can determine which treatment has the greatest effect on infrared laser exposure in mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Predicting New-Onset Diabetes in Pancreatectomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data distribution was verified by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Categorical variables between 2 groups were compared using the Chi-square or Fisher exact test. The continuous variables were compared using Students t test or the Mann–Whitney U test, where appropriate. A logistic regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. The cutoff value of the pancreas volume reduction rate for predicting new onset DM was determined by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Insoluble Glucan Formation Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from three independent experiments. In each experiment, the test was performed in triplicates. Differences between groups were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed Tukey HSD method. SPSS version 23.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. Significantly different insoluble glucan formation was indicated by different superscripts in lower case in Tables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!