The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Liquid chromatographic system

Manufactured by Shimadzu
Sourced in Japan

The Liquid chromatographic system is a laboratory instrument used for the separation, identification, and quantification of chemical compounds in a liquid mixture. It functions by passing the sample mixture through a column filled with a stationary phase, where the compounds are separated based on their interactions with the stationary phase and a mobile phase. The separated compounds are then detected and quantified by various detection methods, such as UV-Vis, mass spectrometry, or refractive index detection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using liquid chromatographic system

1

Quantification of EVG in Mouse Plasma and Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse plasma and brain samples were analyzed for EVG concentration, using the same LC–MS/MS method as described before [30 (link)]. Briefly, EVG and internal standard (RTV) were quantified, using a tandem mass spectrometer AB SCIEX Triple Quad 5500 that was equipped with electron spray ionization. The isolation of analyzed compounds was conducted in a Shimadzu liquid chromatographic system (Kyoto, Japan). The sample extraction was performed by adding 9-volume of cold acetonitrile to an aliquot of plasma or brain homogenate. The multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) transitions (m/z) Q1/Q3 selected for quantitative analyses were 447.9/343.8 for EVG and 721.3/296.1 for the RTV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of MS using HPLC-UV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analysed using a liquid chromatographic system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a CBM-20A system controller connected to an LC-20AD solvent delivery unit, DGU-20A3 degasser system, CTO-10ASVP column oven, SIL-20AHT autosampler and SPD-20A ultraviolet-visible detector. The isocratic mobile phase used was methanol and 0.1% of trifluoroacetic acid in distilled water at a volume ratio of 85:15 and a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45 µm nylon membrane filter under a vacuum condition and sonicated before use. A Phenomenex® Luna C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm; Torrance, CA, USA) fitted with a Thermo Scientific Uniguard™ guard column (Waltham, Boston, MA, USA) with an ODS C18 cartridge (10 × 4 mm ID, 5 μm) was used as stationary phase. UV detection was set at 305 nm and a sample injection volume of 40 μL was used with a column temperature of 40 °C. An internal standard of MS was used during method development and validation. The retention time of MS was ~4.6 min. The limits of detection and quantification for MS were 0.08 and 0.25 µg/mL for a low drug concentration range of 0.25–7 µg/mL, respectively, as well as 4.20 and 12.72 µg/mL for a high drug concentration range of 5–150 µg/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Profiling of Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC profiling was performed in the Shimadzu Liquid Chromatographic System (Tokyo, Japan), consisting of an LC-20AT pump and a double UV-VIS spectrophotometric detector. The eluents were monitored at 330 nm at 30°C. The isocratic mobile phase consisted of methanol −0.1% formic acid (80 : 20, v/v) and ran at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Diamonsil C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, particle size 5 μm, Beijing Dikma Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of AS-IV in Huang Qi Injection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of AS-IV in Huang Qi injection (HQI) was determined using a liquid chromatographic system from Shimadzu Instruments (Kyoto, Japan). The system consisted of an LC-10AVP binary pump and an evaporative light-scattering detector, connected to a computer system (for data acquisition) from LC-Solution. The analytical column used was the Agilent Zorbax Extend C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) from Agilent Corporation. The mobile phase was a mixture of acetonitrile and water in a ratio of 36 : 64 at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume, detector temperature, and pressure were 10 μL, 40°C, and 0.35 MPa, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Liquid Chromatography Analytical Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatographic system (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) equipped with dual LC-20 AT solvent delivery modules connected with DGU-20A3/20A5 on-line degasser, tted with rheodyne manual injector connected with SPD-20A/20AV UV/VIS detector and Shimadzu CBM-20A communication bus module.
Data acquisition was performed on LC solution GPC Chromatographic software (version 1.25). λ max was measured on Shimadzu-1800 double beam UV/vis spectrophotometer. Rotary evaporator (Heidolph G 3 Germany) was used to concentrate the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC-DAD Analysis of Citrus Flavonoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-DAD analysis was performed on a Shimadzu liquid chromatographic system (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Rheodyne injection valve with a 1 μL fixed loop, an SCL-10 AVP pump, and an autosampler. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min, and a thermostated column oven was used with a reverse-phase C18 Purospher STAR tracer 3 μm (55 × 4 mm) (Merck, Germany) column with sample and column temperatures of 5 and 25°C, respectively. Compounds were monitored at 240 and 280 nm using a UV-Vis photodiode array detector (Shimadzu model SPD-MD), and UV spectra were recorded from 200 to 400 nm and were controlled by a GPC/LC solution workstation (version 1.21 SP1).
A gradient mobile phase consisting of methanol (solvent A) and acid H2O (1.0% acetic acid) (solvent B) was used for HPLC analysis. The conditions were as follows: initial conditions of 20% A for 5 min, followed by an increase to 60% A for 10 min, 80% A for 20 min, and 60% A in the following 40 min, and then back to the initial conditions for 10 min. The total run time was 50 min at 0.3 mL/min. Compounds were identified by comparing their retention times (Rt NAR = 9.0 min; Rt HESP = 15.0 min; Rt PON = 17.0 min; Rt NARG = 22.0) and their UV-vis spectra with corresponding standards. Concentrations were determined using an external standard curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!