The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using jsm 7800f field emission scanning electron microscope

1

Characterization of Au-TiO2 Decorated Porous Silicon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface morphology and elemental analysis of PSi were performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) method using a JEOL JSM-7800 F field-emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Au–TiO2 decorated PSi was obtained in the 2θ range of 0–90° on a high-resolution X-ray diffractometer (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). The morphology and particle size of the Au NPs and Au–TiO2 NCPs were investigated through transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEM-2100 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of PVDF-HFP/CB Composite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Nicolet iS10 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to conduct FTIR experiments on films fabricated on a potassium bromide (KBr) disc (25 mm × 4 mm). Omnic software was used to estimate the FTIR peaks. An X-ray diffraction (XRD) model D8 Discover instrument with a Lynxeye XE detector (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was used for further analysis of the PVDF-HFP crystal structure. A JSM-7800F field emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA, USA) was used to provide images and investigate the morphological properties of the PVDF-HFP/CB and pure CB on interdigitated electrodes. An EZ digital FC-7015U 100 MHz universal counter (EZ Digital, Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) with a 9 MHz QCM lever oscillator was used to measure frequency change of modified QCM. Acetone and ethanol concentrations were quantified using a solid phase microextraction (SPME) fiber (divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) of collected samples analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Agilent 7890A/5975C, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UV-visible spectra were recorded on a Presee TU-1950 spectrophotometer (Purkinje, Beijing, China) at a resolution of 1 nm to scan the samples in a wavelength range from 200 to 900 nm. A JSM-7800F field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to image and study the size and morphology of AgNPs. The morphology, size, and electron diffraction pattern (SAED) of the silver nanoparticles were imaged using a JEM-2800 transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 300 kV. X-ray diffraction pattern (XRD) images of dry nanoparticle powder was obtained using an Ulitama IV X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) at the angle range of 2θ (10–80°) [24 (link)]. The Fourier transfer infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained on a Bruker Tensor 37 (Bruker-AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) FTIR instrument. The elemental compositions were detected using energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) using x-act with INCA® and Aztec® EDS analysis software (Oxford Instruments, London, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mounted specimens were removed carefully from slides, hydrated in distilled water, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, critical point dried, and coated with gold (Green, 1967 ), and observed under a JEOL JSM-7800F Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope at 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Characterization of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were obtained using a JEOL JSM-7800F field-emission scanning electron microscope at an acceleration voltage of 5 or 10 kV on a tilt stage. Before SEM imaging, the samples were coated with a layer of Pt using an Edwards Sputter Coater to enhance its conductivity. The optical images were collected via a COSSIM CMY-310 optical microscope. Raman spectrums were obtained via an inVia™ confocal Raman microscope system from Renishaw under a 532 nm laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Nanoparticle Characterization Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were observed under a JEOL-2010 electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 kV. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was performed on a JSM-7800F field-emission scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) with an X-Max50 energy spectrometer (Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK). Nanoparticle size and zeta potential were determined using a Malvern Zetasizer 3000HSA instrument (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) were obtained on a spectrum two infrared spectrometer (Perkinelmer, Walsham, MA, USA) using pressed KBr discs. UV absorption spectra were carried out using a LAMBDA 35 spectrophotometer (Perkinelmer, Walsham, MA, USA). The fluorescent spectra were recorded on a LS-55 fluorescence spectrometer (Perkinelmer, Walsham, MA, USA). Luminescence decay curves were obtained using an FLS-980 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments, Scotland, UK). The excitation light source for obtaining the fluorescence photos was a ZF1-2 UV analyzer (Shanghai Precision Instrument, Shanghai, China) with UV light (254 nm and 365 nm) and simulated sunlight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Drug Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM pictures of drug powders were obtained with a JEOL Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (JSM-7800F, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were fixed with a ribbon carbon double-sided adhesive and covered with a fine chrome layer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microparticle Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microparticles' internal and external morphology before and after exposure to the release medium was studied using a JEOL Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (JSM-7800F, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were fixed with a ribbon carbon double-sided adhesive tape and sputter coated with a thin chrome layer. In case of prior exposure to the release medium, the samples were freeze-dried, as described in Section 2.2 before analysis. Cross-sections of the microparticles were obtained upon inclusion into water-based glue (UHU, Bolton Group, Buehl, Germany), drying for 48 h, and slicing with a razor blade or using a cryostat (Leica CM3050 S, Wetzlar, Germany), as indicated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!