The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultrasoundgate 416h

Manufactured by Avisoft
Sourced in Germany

The UltraSoundGate 416H is a high-performance data acquisition system designed for recording and analyzing ultrasonic signals. It features four independent input channels, each capable of sampling at up to 1 MHz. The device offers a compact and portable design, making it suitable for a variety of applications requiring high-quality ultrasound data capture.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using ultrasoundgate 416h

1

Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrasonic vocalizations produced by the rats were recorded using four microphones (condenser ultrasound CM16/CMPA, frequency range 10–200 kHz, Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany) placed under the elevated platforms (Figure 1A). Data were acquired using UltraSoundGate 416H at a sampling rate of 250 kHz and 16-bit resolution using Avisoft-RECORDER USGH software (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Playback experiments on tethered moths

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Playback experiments took place in an outdoor flight arena (18×5.5×3 m L×W×H) on the WFU campus. Galleria mellonella females were deafened by ablating their tympanic membranes, so that escape behaviors in response to bat echolocation would not be enacted. The moths were tethered by the abdomen to a fine monofilament line (1 m) attached to the ceiling of the flight cage. Individual bats were trained to remove food items (mealworms and adult moths) from the tether prior to the initiation of playback experiments. Bat echolocation cries produced during attacks on the tethered female wax moths were recorded using an ultrasonic microphone connected to an Ultrasound Gate 416H (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany), operated by a computer running Avisoft RECORDER USGH, sampling at 250 kHz (Fig. S2). The microphone was placed 1 m above the moth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pup Vocalizations Analysis in Anechoic Chamber

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pup vocalizations were recorded at P7, P9, and P11 as described previously (49 (link),60 (link)). Pups were placed in an anechoic, sound-attenuating chamber (Med Associates Inc.) within a round plastic tub that was positioned under a CM16 microphone (Avisoft Bioacoustics) in the center of the chamber. Sound was amplified and digitized using UltraSoundGate 416H at a 250 kHz sampling rate and a bit depth of 16 while Avisoft RECORDER software was used to collect the recordings. The USVs of each pup were monitored for 2 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Courtship Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female mice in estrus were identified using vaginal lavage, followed by cytological staining (Giemsa solution, Polysciences) and visual assessment. Male mice were habituated to the experimental arena (40 × 20 cm) for 3 min. Next, an unfamiliar female mouse in estrus was added to the arena, and the mice were allowed to interact freely for 3 min. Ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) between 40 and 250 Hz produced by the male mice were recoded using a preamplifier (UltraSoundGate 416 H, Avisoft Bioacoustics) connected to a microphone (UltraSoundGate CM16, Avisoft Bioacoustics). The total number of USVs and their duration was analyzed using SASLabPro (Avisoft Bioacoustics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Acoustic Monitoring of Soil Fauna

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acoustic measurements began in March 2018. Equipment measuring the acoustic activity of the soil fauna was installed across the three treatments (irrigation/irrigation stop/control, Fig 1A). Three acoustic sensors were distributed randomly in the control (K1–K3), two in the irrigation, and one in the irrigation stop treatment (B1–B3) at distinct distances from the recording computer (Fig 1C), and two additional sensors were mounted to distinguish airborne and soil sounds (K4, B4).
The recording equipment consisted of an array of specially designed contact microphones (see S1 Fig), covering a soil depth of approx. 10 cm and a volume of approx. 1000 cm3. The signal from the sensors was amplified by +40 dB (a factor of 100) using modified hydrophone preamplifiers by Avisoft, Berlin. Signals from both plots were digitized by two 4-channel audio interfaces (Avisoft UltraSoundGate 416h) and recorded on a minicomputer at 10-min intervals (20-s recordings) using Avisoft’s Recorder software (Fig 1C). The loss of signal strength due to long audio cables (25 m) was compensated by +18 dB in the internal amplifiers of the audio interfaces, and the captured signals were recorded with a high-pass filter of 0.05 KHz (512 taps, filtering low-frequency noise out) and a sampling rate of 50 KHz. The whole system was powered by a fuel cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Simultaneous Recording of Locomotor Activity and 50-kHz Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As performed in our laboratory, locomotor activity and 50-kHz USVs were recorded simultaneously in customized sound-attenuating chambers (Kim et al., 2021 (link); Lee et al., 2022 (link)). The chamber consisted of two boxes to minimize exterior noise (inside box: 54 × 38 × 35 cm, outside box: 68 × 50 × 51 cm). A condenser ultrasonic microphone (Ultramic250K; Dodotronic, Castel Gandolfo, Italy) and a digital camera were positioned at the center of the ceiling of the chamber. The 50-kHz USVs were recorded using the ultrasonic microphone with an UltraSoundGate 416H data acquisition device (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienicke, Germany). Ultrasonic vocal signals were band-filtered between 38 and 96 kHz for the 50-kHz USVs and analyzed using Avisoft-SASLab Pro (version 4.2; Avisoft Bioacoustics, Glienicke, Germany). Locomotor activity was measured with a video-tracking system (Ethovision XT; Noldus Information Technology BV, Wageninge, Netherlands). After recording baseline activity for 30 min, the rats were given an intraperitoneal injection of cocaine (15 mg/kg) and/or MS and monitored for up to 60 min after cocaine injection. The data were expressed as the distance traveled for locomotor behaviors and the numbers of 50-kHz USVs during each 10 min period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Acoustic Analysis of Mouse Vocalizations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vocalizations were recorded using an UltraSoundGate condenser microphone CM16/CMPA (Avisoft Bioacoustics; Berlin, GER) connected via an UltraSoundGate 416H audio device (Avisoft Bioacoustics) to a personal computer. Acoustic data were recorded as a WAV file with a sampling rate of 250 kHz in 16‐bit format by Avisoft RECORDER USGH (version 4.2.30). Specific recording conditions for each experiment are described below. Avisoft SASLab Pro (version 5.2.15) with a 256 fast Fourier transform was used to generate spectrograms. An investigator blinded to the experimental condition identified calls manually. Calls were categorized as either ultrasonic (>20 kHz) or audible (<20 kHz) mouse squeaks. A separate investigator blinded to the experimental condition listened to the audio files to confirm mouse squeaks. The false‐positive rate for audible mouse squeaks called from the spectrogram was 2.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Pup Ultrasonic Vocalizations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We measured pup ultrasonic vocalizations in a social isolation task at P7, P9, and P11. The ultrasonic vocalizations of each animal were monitored for 2 min in a sound-attenuating chamber (Med Associates Inc.). For Atoh1Cre/+;Vglut2fl/fl mice and littermate controls, vocalizations were recorded using a CM16 microphone (Avisoft Bioacoustics). Sound was amplified and digitized using UltraSoundGate 416H at a 250 kHz sampling rate, and bit depth of 16 while Avisoft RECORDER software was used to collect the recordings. For Ntsr1Cre;Vglut2fl/fl mice and littermate controls, we measured vocalizations using a Noldus microphone and UltraVox XT software. Due to minimal congruency between the number of vocalizations recorded between these two recording systems79 (link), we only compared mutants to control littermates whose vocalizations were measured using the same system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Male Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrasonic vocalisations were obtained from five male C57BL/6 mice in response to urine samples from conspecific females in oestrus, across 11 recording sessions. The urine stimulus consisted of the tip of one sterile cotton bud soaked in a mixture of freshly collected urine from at least two animals. Sounds were recorded at a sampling frequency of 250 kHz (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Germany) using a condenser ultrasonic microphone (CM16/CMPA), recording interface (UltrasoundGate 416H), and software (Avisoft Recorder version 5.2.09, all from Avisoft Bioacoustics).
The stimulus set used in the playback experiments (‘intact/original songs’) consisted of a subset of seven songs produced by three C57BL/6 male mice (median age 22 wk) over six recording sessions. The sound files were high-pass filtered above 40 kHz and were denoised using the frequency-domain noise reduction algorithm in Avisoft SASlab Pro (version 5.2.09, Avisoft Bioacoustics). Syllable detection and segmentation was verified manually. Sound files were up-sampled to 260,420 Hz with anti-aliasing for playback.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Rodent Pups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
According to previously described protocols,13, 16, 22, 23, 24 at P6, each pup was separated from its mother and littermates, placed on a transparent plastic round dish (10 cm diameter) with fresh woodchip bedding, and transferred to a sound‐attenuating chamber for USV recording at P6. An ultrasound microphone (Avisoft Bioacoustics CM16/CMPA) was inserted through a hole in the middle of the cover of the chamber, about 10 cm above the offspring in its dish, to record vocalizations. The recorded vocalizations were transferred to an UltraSound Gate 416H detector set (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Germany) at 20–125 kHz. The control pups were tested and then the target pups. After a 5‐min recording session, pups were sacrificed immediately or isolated 2 h before sacrifice. This procedure was repeated in sequence until all pups had been recorded. Room temperature was maintained at 22°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!