The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dnadvance kit

Manufactured by Beckman Coulter
Sourced in United States, Canada

The DNAdvance kit is a laboratory reagent designed for the extraction and purification of DNA from various sample types. The kit utilizes a silica-based membrane technology to capture and elute DNA, enabling efficient and reliable DNA isolation for downstream applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using dnadvance kit

1

Chitin Degradation Community Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the data presented in Fig. 4, all isolates were pregrown in individual wells of a 96-well plate containing MB media for 48 hours. The individual precultures were then combined in equal volumes, washed in MBL salts, and inoculated into deep-well 96-well plates containing MBL with 40 mg of colloidal chitin as the sole carbon source. In each dilution cycle, communities were allowed to grow for 84 hours and then diluted into fresh media with the appropriate dilution factor (1/10, 1/100, or 1/1000). To determine community dynamics through time, DNA was extracted using the Beckman-Coulter DNAdvance Kit and sequenced using the EMP 16S amplicon protocol [using 515F (parada)–806R(apprill) primers] at the Environmental Sample Preparation and Sequencing Facility (ESPSF), which is located in the Argonne National Laboratory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Variant Identification in Cats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic DNA of each cat was extracted from whole blood or buccal swab samples or reproductive tissues removed by castration. DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Netherlands) was used for DNA extraction from reproductive tissues and blood according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Likewise, Chemagic ™ DNA Buccal Swab Kit (PerkinElmer, U.S.) and DNAdvance Kit (Beckman Coulter, U.S.) were used for DNA extraction from the oral mucosal tissue. The extracted DNA samples were used to identify MYBPC3 (p.A31P, p.R820W, and p.A74T), MYH7 (p.E1883K), and ALMS1 (p.G3376R) variants. The genotypes of MYBPC3 p.A31P and p.R820W were confirmed by the Taqman assay, while the others were identified by Sanger sequencing (primers and probes are shown in S1 Table) performed at Eurofins Genomics Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). The obtained DNA sequences were aligned using MEGA 7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets [29 (link)]. The genotype of each sample was classified as wild-type (WT), heterozygous, or homozygous.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

COMT Val158Met Genotyping from Saliva

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from saliva in Oragene collection vials (DNA Genotek Inc., ON, Canada) using the DNAdvance kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics, Danvers, MA, USA) and genotyped as previously reported (25 (link)). The COMT Val158Met SNP, rs4680, was genotyped using the Sequenom iPlex chemistries and the MassARRAY system (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The assay cell rate was 97.6%. Within and across plate duplicates were used for quality control. All duplicates were concordant. Genotypes for control samples (identified as those without PTSD) were in Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (p > 0.05). HWE was performed in all genotyped samples and was used to confirm that the genotype is accurate. Participants who were homozygous for the G-allele (Val/Val; N = 38) were compared to individuals who carried at least one A-allele (Met/Val or Met/Met; N = 35). This “dominant” model has previously been used to address the skewed genotypic distributions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Grady Trauma Project GWAS Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples from the Grady Trauma Project (GTP) were used to assess the ability of each algorithm to call CNVs from a GWAS pipeline. The participants are all adult, primarily African American, female, and have been previously described (Binder et al., 2008 (link); Gillespie et al., 2009 (link); Ressler et al., 2011 (link)). Samples were collected from the general medical clinics of Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA. Participants who were waiting for appointments in the primary care and obstetrics and gynecology clinics were approached by a member of the research team to conduct screening interviews and collect saliva samples. After completion of initial interviews, study participants were invited to participate in a secondary phase of the study in which blood samples were collected. DNA was extracted from saliva by Oragene collection vials (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada) using the DNAdvance kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics, Danvers, MA, USA) for genotyping. DNA was extracted from blood samples using the E.Z.N.A. Mag-Bind Blood DNA Kit (Omerga Bio-Tek, Nocross, GA, USA) or ArchivePure DNA Blood Kit (5 Prime, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and assessed for DNA methylation. This study was approved by the Emory Institutional Review Board.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genotyping Saliva and Blood DNA Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from saliva in Oragene collection vials (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada) using the DNAdvance kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics, Danvers, MA, USA), while DNA from blood was extracted using either the E.Z.N.A. Mag-Bind Blood DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) or ArchivePure DNA Blood Kit (5 Prime, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). N = 4,791 subjects were genotyped on the HumanOmniExpress (6%) and the Omni1-Quad BeadChip (94%) (Illumina Inc), and genotypes were called with Illumina’s Genome Studio. The HumanOmniExpress interrogates 730,525 individual SNPs per sample, whereas the Omni1- Quad BeadChip interrogates 1,011,219 individual SNPs (for further details see Supplementary Material).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Yellowtail Fin Cells Transfection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both the calcium phosphate precipitation method [29 ] and the lipofection method using the Lipofectamine 2,000 Reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) were used to transfer the Geneticin® resistant gene, pSV2neo, into the yellowtail fin cells. The treated cells were cultured in L-15 medium (Invitrogen, USA) containing Geneticin® (1 mg/mL, Invitrogen, USA) at 22°C to select the transformed cells. More than 300 independent Geneticin®-resistant clones were pooled for the fusion experiments. These cells were irradiated by exposure to 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 8,000, or 10,000 rads (MBR-1520R; Hitachi Power Solutions Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan), and were fused with derivative mouse B78 cells at a 2:1 ratio in the presence of polyethylene glycol 1500 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The cells were cultivated with DMEM medium (Invitrogen, USA) containing Geneticin® for 3–4 weeks until hybrid clone colonies appeared. DNA was extracted from individual clones using a DNAdvance Kit (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted using the Agencourt DNAdvance kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beckmann Coulter, CA, USA). The extracted DNA was quantified and analyzed for its quality using the Spectrophotometer 190 (Molecular Devices, CA, USA) device. As quality criteria, a concentration higher than 40 ng/µl and an absorbance ratio 260/280 of 1.8–2 were used. The integrity of the DNA was also taken into account by electrophoretic running. Next, the Infinium HTS Automated Protocol (Illumina) [19 ] was followed with the objective of genotyping the samples. For this, the beadchip Global Screening Array-24 + V1.0/HTS CODIGO46_2017_01 was used. Genotypes described in Table 1 were determined using Genome Studio software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Rapid Bacterial DNA Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA purification was done using the DNAdvance Kit (Beckman Coulter, A48705) following the manufacturer’s protocol with the modification that the input for the kit is 100 μl of Lysis Master Mix combined with 100 μl of bacterial culture that is diluted to an OD600 of less than 0.2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DNA Methylation Profiling from Saliva Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from saliva in Oragene collection vials (DNA Genotek Inc, Ontario, Canada) using the DNAdvance kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics, Danvers, MA). Approximately 2 ml of saliva was collected from each participant. Our previous research comparing methylation in brain, blood and saliva found that saliva produced methylation data comparable to brain tissue26 (link). Genomic DNA was bisulfite converted using the EZ-96 DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research), and DNA methylation levels were interrogated for >480,000 CpG sites using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip. Hybridization and processing was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions as previously described27 (link). Beta values were generated with BeadStudio and were set to missing (no call) if detection p-values exceeded 0.001. All samples had probe detection call rates <95% and an average intensity value of either <50% of the experiment-wide sample mean or <2,000 arbitrary units (AU). CpG sites with missing data for >10% of samples were excluded from analysis. Normalization of probe distribution and background differences between Type I and type II probes was conducted using Beta Mixture Quantile Normalization (BMIQ)28 (link), and ComBat was used to account for sources of technical variations including batch and positional effects29 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genetic Identification of Farmed Salmonids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from eggs was isolated as described by Mateos‐Rivera et al. (2020 ), while cod tissue was suspended in lysis buffer from the DNAdvance kit (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA) and processed using a Biomek i5 Automated Workstation (Beckman Coulter), following the manufacturer's instructions.
All samples (eggs and tissues) were genotyped with 21 microsatellite loci. Microsatellites were chosen as the marker of choice as extensive experience in genetic identification of farmed salmonids and gadoids (Glover et al., 2008 , 2010 (link), 2011 ) has illustrated that they are effective at detecting founder effects and drift that are rife in aquaculture and that they effectively resolve parent‐offspring and sibship relations (Duval et al., 2021 (link); Quintela et al., 2016 ). Detailed genotyping conditions are summarized in Table S1. PCR products were diluted 1:20 and analysed on an ABI3730 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, MA, USA). Microsatellite alleles were scored using GeneMapper v6.0 (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!