The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quanta 200 feg

Manufactured by JEOL
Sourced in Japan

The Quanta 200 FEG is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) manufactured by JEOL. It is equipped with a field emission gun (FEG) source, which provides high-resolution imaging capabilities. The Quanta 200 FEG is designed for a variety of applications, including materials science, nanotechnology, and life sciences.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using quanta 200 feg

1

Structural Analysis of NiO/MoSe2 Heterostructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure of the NiO/MoSe2 was investigated by using a powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) spectrometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) (X’pert powder XRD system, Malvern Panalytical). The surface morphology of the samples were characterized by using FE-SEM (FEI Quanta FEG 200) and HR-TEM (TEM, JEM-2100 Plus, Jeol) with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. For TEM characterizations, 3 µL suspension of (0.5 mg/mL) NiO/MoSe2 was drop casted on copper grid and dried at room temperature. The sample coated copper grid was used for HR-TEM analysis. A PHI Versa Probe III Scanning XPS Microprobe was used for the XPS analysis (Physical Electronics, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fabrication of PLLA Films with Micro-Nano Topography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) soft mold was made from a micro- or nano-patterned template by soft lithography, as previously described [38 (link)]. Briefly, the PDMS 10:1 elastomer and curing agent mixture was degassed, dispensed onto the masters and cured at 65 °C.
PLLA films were made by solvent casting using 3% w/v PLLA (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dissolved in chloroform on the PDMS soft mold. The films were dried at room temperature covered with a glass dish. PLLA films were vacuum dried in a desiccator for 5 min to remove any residual solvent before demolding. The PLLA films were trimmed to 1.0-cm2 squares and sterilized with 70% ethanol (v/v) and ultraviolet irradiation.
To verify the surface morphology and fidelity of the micro- and nano-topography replication process, PLLA films were sputter coated with gold (JEOL JFC 1600 Fine Gold Coater, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta FEG 200 and JEOL JSM-5600LV Scanning Microscope, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Materials Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopy images were taken
using a scanning electron microscope (Quanta 200FEG, Jeol Co.) and
a high-resolution scanning electron microscope (Gemini 300, Zeiss).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning TEM (STEM) and
energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were conducted
using a Themis Z system. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) was resolved
using CrystBox diffractGUI. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
measurements were conducted using a Scanning 5600 AES/XPS multitechnique
system (PHI, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were conducted
using a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Material Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological features of the samples were characterized using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI Quanta 200 FEG) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL 2011). Elemental distribution mapping was performed by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) coupled with SEM. The crystal structure was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/max 2500) with Cu Kα radiation (k = 1.5406 Å) operating at 40 kV. Raman measurements were performed by laser Raman spectroscopy (Jobin Yvon, T6400). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out using an AXIS ULTRA DLD instrument with aluminum Kα X-ray radiation. The resistance test was carried out on a semiconductor powder resistance tester ST2722 (JINGGE Electronics Co., Ltd, Suzhou, China). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area and pore features were determined using nitrogen adsorption desorption (JW-BK 122W, JWGB, China) at 77 K.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Synthesized Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structures of as-synthesized materials were measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Cu Kα, λ = 1.54056 Å) with a Rigaku D/max-IIIA diffractometer at 293 K. The morphology and microstructure of the materials were characterized using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Quanta 200 FEG), and their detailed microstructure was further evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Model JEM-2011, JEOL, Japan) with a Rontec EDX system. XPS spectra were obtained using a Thermo Fisher Scientific ESCALAB 250. All of the XPS spectra were calibrated with the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV as the binding energy reference. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra were obtained using a Bruker A300 spectrometer (microwave frequency = 9.74 GHz; modulation amplitude = 2 G; modulation frequency = 50 KHz; time constant = 10 ms; conversion time = 25 ms). The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were collected using KBr as the reference sample on a Spectrum Two FTIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA). The TG spectra were measured using a Labsys evo TG-DTA/DSC (Setram, Lyon, France). The Raman spectra were obtained using a Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, London, UK). N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were performed on an A Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer (Micromeritics, Georgia, USA) at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Characterization of Powder Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of the samples was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Philips, FEI Quanta 200 FEG) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tokyo, Japan, JEOL 2100F). The composition of the sample was analyzed by an energy dispersive spectroscope (EDS, INCA) attached to the SEM. Infrared spectra were recorded on a PE (Spot-light 3000) Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer using the KBr disk technique to investigate the different functional groups in the powders before and after annealing. Raman spectroscopy (Spex Raman Log 1403) was employed to verify chemical bonding characteristics of carbon. Thermogravimetric analysis TG-DSC (SETARAM, LABSYS evo) was carried out in the temperature range 30 to 1000 °C at a scanning rate of 10 °C min−1 in air.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Surface Materials via XPS and SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XPS measurements were performed
using the 5600 Multi-Technique System (PHI, U.S.A.). SEM images were
taken using Environmental SEM (Quanta 200FEG, Jeol Co.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!