The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Waters 1525 binary pump

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The Waters 1525 binary pump is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) pump designed to deliver precise and consistent flow rates of mobile phases to the HPLC system. It features two independent pump heads that can operate in parallel to provide stable and accurate binary gradients. The pump is capable of delivering flow rates ranging from 0.001 to 10.000 mL/min and can operate at a maximum pressure of 6000 psi.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using waters 1525 binary pump

1

Validated HPLC Method for Fluconazole

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The concentration of fluconazole in the test solutions was analyzed using an HPLC system that consisted of Waters 1525 binary pumps, 2489 dual absorbance detector, and Waters Breeze Software 2.0 versions (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). A C-18 reversed-phase HPLC column (4.6 mm × 150 mm) with a 5-μm particle size packing material (Mightysil RP-18 GP, Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used. The mobile phase was acetonitrile:water (30:70) with a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The detection wavelength was set at 210 nm. The retention time of fluconazole was approximately 2.8 min. Under these conditions, good linearity and reproducibility were demonstrated over the 20–60 μg mL−1 fluconazole range. The limit of detection and limit of quantification, which were determined and computed using a linear regression curve [20 (link)], were found to be 18.22 and 55.21 µg mL−1, respectively. Additionally, the relative standard deviations of the intra-day and inter-day variations of the fluconazole peak area at the concentrations of 20 and 40 µg mL−1 were less than 1 and 2%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RP-HPLC Analysis of HMF and DFF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses of HMF and DFF were implemented by RP-HPLC using Waters 1525 Binary Pumps and a Waters 2489 UV-Visible detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) on a Zorbax SB C-18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, Agilent) The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and 0.1 wt% trifluoroacetic acid aqueous solution (v/v = 15:85) at 0.8 mL/min. The column oven temperature was maintained at 35 °C. The UV detection wavelength was 284 nm. Under these conditions, the retention times of HMF and DFF were 5.1 and 6.9 min, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Analysis of Arbutin Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC analyses were performed according to Rathi et al., 2019 [36 (link)], with some modifications, as described below. The quantification was conducted on Waters HPLC system, consisting of Waters 1525 Binary pumps with Waters 2487 Dual λ Absorbance Detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), equipped with a reverse-phase Kinetex® C18, 100 Å (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) core-shell column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), operating at 26 °C. The mobile phase consisted of water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B), with a flow rate 0.5 mL/min and gradient elution as follows: 0–2 min 99% A; 2–6 min decreased to 40% A; 6–15 min gradually increased back to 99% A arbutin was detected at 285 nm. Six solutions of the arbutin, with different concentrations ranging from 25 to 200 μg/mL dissolved in methanol, were used to construct a linear calibration curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All 22 standards (GR grade, 1-22) of respective essential oil components were purchased from following sources: BA (100%), BNZLD (99%) from Merck, Germany, TCNMA (99%), CNMOH (98%), EGL (99%), CVL (97%), ATPNOL (90%), GRNL (98%), MYR (95%) from Aldrich, Germany, SFRL (97%), TCRPHLN (98.5%) from Sigma, Germany, CMN (90%), TCNM (99%), CVN(98%), DHCVN (98%), LNL (97%), BBZT (99%), LMN (90%) from Across Organics, ATPA (90%), PNN (98%) from Fluka. Methanol and acetonitrile gradient grade for HPLC analysis were obtained from Merck (Germany). High purity water was prepared using Milli Q purification system from Millipore (Peenya, Bangalore, India); all commercial oils were purchased from International Flavors and Fragrances India Limited, India.
The HPLC system consisted of Waters 1525 binary pump, Waters 717 plus auto sampler and Waters 2487 dual λ absorbance detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Reversed phase columns, Hypersil ODS C18 (100×4.6 mm, i.d. 3μ) from Thermo Fischer, USA, Spherisorb C18 (125×4.6 mm, i.d. 3μ) from Waters, USA and Wakosil-II C18 (150×4.6 mm, i.d. 3μ) from SGE, Australia were used. Free statistics software, version 1.1.23-r7m Wessa, P. (2013) was used for statistical calculation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isoperidone Encapsulation Efficiency in Microspheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the encapsulation efficiency of isoperidone in the microspheres, 2 mg of the lyophilized microspheres were dissolved in 1 ml acetonitrile. Next, the resulting solution was diluted in methanol:ultrapure water (80:20, v/v) to 20 ml, filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and the isoperidone content was analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The HPLC system consisted of a Waters 1525 binary pump and a Waters 2487 Dual Absorbance Detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) set at 280 nm. An Agilent Extend C18 column (4.6×250 mm, 5 µm; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used for drug separation. A mixture of methanol:water:triethylamine [80:19.5:0.5 (v/v/v)], adjusted to pH 10.22 with acetic acid, was used as the mobile phase, as previously described (21 (link)). The flow rate was set at 1 ml/min. Chromatography was performed at 25°C with an injection volume of 20 µl. The drug loading percentage and encapsulation efficiency were calculated as follows: Encapsulation efficiency (%)=(drug loading determined by HPLC/theoretical drug loading) ×100 (1 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Spectroscopic Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and were used without purification. Water was purified (18 MΩ cm) using a standard Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). “PE” (petroleum ether) refers to petroleum ether with a boiling point in the range of 40–60 °C. NMR spectra (including 1H-decoupled 13C NMR) were recorded on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer (Bruker, Milano, Italy) operating at 11.74 T and 298 K, corresponding to a protonic resonance frequency of 499.8 MHz. 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts are reported relative to TMS and are referenced using the residual proton solvent resonances. Samples were prepared in 5 mm NMR tubes by dissolving the compounds in appropriate deuterated solvents. Splitting patterns are described as singlet (s), broad singlet (bs), doublet (d), double doublet (dd), triplet (t) or multiplet (m). ESI mass spectra were recorded on a Waters SQD 3100 (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Analytical HPLC-MS was carried out on a Waters modular system equipped with Waters 1525 binary pump, Waters 2487 UV/Vis and Waters SQD 3100 (ESCI ionization mode) detectors using an XBridgeTM Phenyl 3.5 μm 4.6 mm × 150 mm column (Waters). Semi-preparative HPLC purifications were performed with a XBridgeTM Prep Phenyl 5 μm OBDTM 19 mm × 100 mm column (Waters). The HPLC methods are indicated for each procedure (Table 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Glycomonomers by NMR, GPC, and MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was performed with a Varian MercuryPLUS (300 MHz) spectrometer by taking an average of 128 scans (delay 5 s) using appropriate solvents (CDCl3 or D2O). Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) was performed on a Waters system with Waters 1525 Binary Pump and Waters 2414 differential refractive index detector utilizing two highly efficient PolySep GFC columns (elution range 3k to 400k Da). An aqueous solution containing 0.1 M NaNO3 and 0.01% (w/v) NaN3 was filtered and used as the eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min at 25 °C. The molecular weight calibration was performed with monodisperse linear poly(ethylene oxide) (Polymer Standard Service). For molecular weights, the entire signal of a major peak including its shoulder at a lower retention volume was integrated. Mass spectrometry was done on a ThermoFinnigan TSQ 7000 triple-quadrapole instrument that was equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. Glycomonomer samples (1 mg/mL) in a 1:1 (v/v) methanol/water solution containing sodium chloride (1 mg/mL) were injected into the ESI source at a rate of 10 µL/s. All data were analyzed using Xcalibur (FisherScientific, Inc.) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Sunitinib Release from DEB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5 μL of supernatant was sampled from sunitinib DEB treated HCT116 cells at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 24 hours of exposure, and it was then diluted 1:10 in phosphate buffered saline prior to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. HPLC analysis was performed using a c18 Luna (150 * 4.6 mm) column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) attached to a Waters 1525 binary pump (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with a mixed solvent of water (20%) and acetonitrile (80%) containing 0.1% TFA, and UV detector set to 425nm. Sunitinib concentration was calculated based on a standard curve of 20 μM sunitinib in cell culture medium. To evaluate the maximal release fraction of sunitinib from DEB after 24h, loaded DEB (5 mg/ml) were incubated in a surplus of supplemented McCoy’s 5a cell culture medium so that the maximal achievable concentration could be 20 μM in case of complete eluting from DEB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Dopamine Quantification in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were sacrificed, their brains removed and placed on ice. Dorsal striatum and nucleus accumbens were dissected and weighed, then flash-frozen and stored at −80 °C. Tissue samples were ultrasonicated in 0.1 M perchloric acid and stored at −80 °C until extraction. Upon thawing, the samples were homogenized in 0.1 M perchloric acid and centrifuged at 25,000 g for 12 min. Dopamine levels were measured by HPLC with electrochemical detection. The analytical column was a SunFire C18 5 lm (4.6–150.0 mm) from Waters (Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase was 0.01 M sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 0.01 M citric acid, 1.2 mM sodium EDTA, 1.2 mM sodium 1- heptane sulfonic acid, 10% methanol, pH 3.5; the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the column temperature was 34 °C. The installation consisted of a Waters 717 Plus automated injection system, a Waters 1525 Binary pump, and an ESA Coulochem III detector (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Waters Breeze system was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Organic Acids and Lactose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organic acids and lactose were extracted using a method modified from Upreti et al. (2006) . Permeates were analyzed at 10% solids. One hundred microliters of each sample was extracted in 900 μL of 0.013 N H 2 SO 4 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), vortexed, and centrifuged at 8,000 × g at room temperature (21°C) for 5 min. The top layer was removed and filtered using 0.45-μm nylon syringe filters (VWR International, West Chester, PA). Twenty microliters of each sample was injected on the HPLC (Waters 1525 Binary Pump, Waters, Milford, MA) using an autosampler (Waters 2707 Autosampler) onto the column (0.8 mL/min, 300 × 7.8 ion exclusion, 55°C; Bio-Rad Labs, Richmond, CA). Each replicate of each permeate was injected in duplicate. The temperature of the injector was 4°C and a photodiode array detector (Waters 2998) was used for organic acids and a refractive index detector (Waters 2414 Refractive Index Detector, 30°C) was used for lactose. The maxima used for organic acid calculation was 254 and 285 nm due to citric and orotic acids coeluting at 254 nm. Citric acid was not detected at 285 nm. A standard curve was created for each organic acid and lactose. Organic acid standards were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Pittsburgh, PA) and lactose standard was obtained from Sigma Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!