The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prepit l2p

Manufactured by DNA Genotek
Sourced in Canada, United States

The PrepIT-L2P is a DNA/RNA extraction system designed for use with a wide range of sample types. It is a pre-filled and sealed extraction device that automates the extraction process, providing consistent and high-quality nucleic acid samples for downstream applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

40 protocols using prepit l2p

1

Saliva and Cell Line DNA Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oragene DNA saliva collection kits (DNA Genotek, Ottawa, Canada) were used to collect saliva samples for gDNA isolation (Subjects C01~C05, F1-01~-05, F2-01 and F2-02). Fibroblasts (Subjects F2-03, F2-05, F2-06) and myoblasts (Subject F2-04) were cultured, as previously described [36 (link)], for gDNA isolation. The gDNA was isolated using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and prepIT•L2P (DNA Genotek).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Infant DNA Sample Collection and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With assistance, mothers collected saliva samples from their infants at the 4-month assessment using Oragene·DISCOVER DNA collection kits (#OGR-575, DNA Genotek). After mixing samples with stabilizing reagents in collection tubes, samples were shipped to the University of Pittsburgh for extraction and purification of DNA using PrepIT L2P DNA Genotek). Resulting DNA was then evaluated for the rs373863828 SNP, per the manufacturer’s instructions, with a pre-designed TaqMan® SNP assay (Assay ID# C_203097374_10, Applied Biosystems) and using an ABI 7900HT instrument and TaqMan® Genotyper Software. All attempted genotypes were successfully measured except one sample, which was not sufficient to produce a result.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Omics Analysis of Saliva and Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva samples (whole-genome sequencing [WGS], methylome, and microbiome) were incubated for 2 hours at 56 °C, followed by DNA isolation using PrepIT L2P (DNA Genotek). DNA from whole blood (methylome) was isolated using the DNA Blood 200,360 prefilling H96 Kit (CMG-717, PerkinElmer), and 200 µL of whole blood on the Chemagic 360 system (PerkinElmer) was used. Microbial DNA was extracted from saliva aliquots using a modified protocol from Teng et al [21 (link)] using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). All extracted DNA was evaluated using the Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) and the Nano Drop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and sequenced using the Invitrogen Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (P7589) on the Hamilton Microlab Star before storage at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Saliva DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A commercial kit (prepIT-L2P, DNA Genotek, Ottawa, ON, Canada) was used to extract DNA from each saliva sample, collected with a specific Oragene DNA tube at the first time point of the field study, after which the DNA was stored at −20 °C. The DNA was then analyzed with commercial genotyping assays for the SNP CC16 G38A polymorphism (rs3741240) and SNP UGRP1 G112A (rs1368408) as previously described [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pediatric Cataract Evaluation in South Asia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Children under 16 years of age attending blind schools in Bhutan (Farmer et al., 2015), Cambodia (Sia et al., 2010), and Sri Lanka (Gao et al., 2011) underwent an ocular examination and review of records as part of audits of the causes of childhood blindness in each community as described previously (Farmer et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2011; Sia et al., 2010). While all children were examined at the time of recruitment, it was not possible to access historical medical records to determine age of onset, or to interview the family for a detailed history. The recruitment of additional family members was only possible if the family decided to attend the school on the day of the survey.
Patients were included in this analysis if they were observed to have bilateral pediatric (or congenital) cataract, with or without other ocular or systemic features. Patients with aniridia were excluded, even if cataract was also present. Where possible, additional affected and unaffected family members were also examined and recruited. Saliva was collected from each participant in the DNA saliva collection kit (Oragene DNA saliva collection kit) and extracted using prepIT L2P (DNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genomic DNA extraction from diverse samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using the Puregene Blood Core Kit (QIAGEN), saliva using the Oragene Saliva Kit (DNA Genotek), buccal cells from Oragene Saliva Kits following centrifugation, and skin fibroblasts following a skin biopsy. Fibroblasts were grown in DMEM/F12 with glutamine, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PenStrep (all three from Gibco). DNA was extracted both directly and from fibroblasts after digesting with proteinase K in Cell Lysis Buffer (both QIAGEN) using prepIT.L2P (DNA Genotek) and ethanol precipitation. Lymphocytes were separated from whole blood using Ficoll and subsequently transformed to lymphoblastoid (LB) cell lines using Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in RPMI 1640 media with glutamine, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PenStrep (all three from Gibco). Genomic DNA was then extracted using a Puregene Blood Core Kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA extraction from diverse samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood using the Puregene Blood Core Kit (QIAGEN), saliva using the Oragene Saliva Kit (DNA Genotek), buccal cells from Oragene Saliva Kits following centrifugation, and skin fibroblasts following a skin biopsy. Fibroblasts were grown in DMEM/F12 with glutamine, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PenStrep (all three from Gibco). DNA was extracted both directly and from fibroblasts after digesting with proteinase K in Cell Lysis Buffer (both QIAGEN) using prepIT.L2P (DNA Genotek) and ethanol precipitation. Lymphocytes were separated from whole blood using Ficoll and subsequently transformed to lymphoblastoid (LB) cell lines using Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in RPMI 1640 media with glutamine, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PenStrep (all three from Gibco). Genomic DNA was then extracted using a Puregene Blood Core Kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Saliva DNA Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GRaD. Saliva was collected using Oragene-DNA kits and DNA was then extracted with prepIT-L2P (OG-500; DNA Genotek Inc, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada). Participants were genotyped for >2 million SNPs using the Illumina Infinium Omni2.5-8 BeadChip at the Yale Center for Genome Analysis (Orange, CT, USA). Initial genotyping quality control and SNP genotyping calls were conducted using GenomeStudio (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and standard Infinium genotyping data analysis parameters were used to optimize genotyping accuracy. Individuals were removed if they were missing more than 3% of their genotypes (n = 39), if there were discrepancies between reported and inferred sex based on X chromosome heterozygosity (n = 52), and if IBD > 0.125 using REAP (n = 10) 61 (link) . SNPs were removed from downstream analyses if they had minor allele frequency of less than 5% (n = 926,457), missingness greater than 5% (n = 22,849), Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium p<0.0001 (n = 116,259) or were not autosomal (n = 60,551). 1,331 participants and 1,265,623 SNPs passed these quality control filters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping DNA Variants Using Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was collected from saliva using Oragene-DNA kits (DNA Genotek Inc.) and extracted with prepIT-L2P (DNA Genotek Inc.) using manufacturer protocols. READ1 genotyping was conducted using PCR amplification and purified of PCR reagents. Sanger sequencing was performed at the Yale W.M. Keck DNA Sequencing Facility using standard protocols. Primer sequences and amplification protocols are described in detail elsewhere.30 (link) READ1 genotypes were called from chromatograms using a custom program written in C + + (Dr. Yong Kong, available upon request). If the calling program identified errors, chromatograms were manually examined and deconvoluted for genotype calls. The genotype call rate for READ1 alleles in the GRaD sample was 0.987.
Allele-specific PCR was used to genotype the 2445 bp microdeletion in intron 2 of DCDC2, which encompasses READ1. Primer sequences and amplification protocols for microdeletion genotyping are described in detail elsewhere.30 (link) The deletion genotype call rate was 0.972 in the GRaD sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Epigenomic Profiling of Saliva DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saliva samples were incubated for 2 h at 56 °C, and DNA isolation carried out with PrepIT.L2P (DNA Genotek Inc., Canada) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and integrity of the genomic DNA preparations were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the quantity of DNA was determined using Quant-IT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). In preparation for DNA methylation analysis, 500 ng of DNA was bisulphite converted using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles were generated using the Infinium Methylation EPIC Beadchip Array, and the Beadchip images captured using an Illumina iScan (Cambridge Genomic Services, Cambridge, UK) for matched cases (n = 16) and controls (n = 16).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!