The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statview software version 5

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

StatView software version 5.0 is a data analysis and presentation software developed by SAS Institute. It provides users with tools for data management, statistical analysis, and graphical presentation of results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

45 protocols using statview software version 5

1

Statistical Analysis of Protein Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Fischer’s LSD post hoc means comparison test using Stat View software version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC, US). Values are represented as the standard error of the mean (SEM) compared to control unless stated otherwise. P values were considered statistically significant as followed: *p<0.05, ** p< 0.01 and *** < 0.001.
Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). The average percent positive area values measured by immunohistochemistry were normalized to the GFP controls. Protein levels measured by Western blot were normalized to levels of either actin or GAPDH expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Normalized Immunohistochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance followed by Fischer’s LSD post hoc means comparison test using Stat View software version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary NC, US). Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). The average% positive area value measured by immunohistochemistry was normalized to the PBS controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statview software version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc) was used for data analysis. Differences between groups were assessed using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests for proportions, Student’s t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate for continuous variables. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biomarker and Neuronal Density Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical computations were based on Statview software version 5.0 (SAS Institute, NC, USA). Descriptive statistics are reported where results represent means ± standard deviations. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean levels of each biomarker across all groups (C, C-EE, TPS, TPS-EE, MPS, MPS-EE), followed by Fisher’s post-hoc tests or pairwise Student t-tests. The alpha level was set to 0.05 and significant P-values were designated with an asterisk or hashtag in all tables and figures.
As rCALM is an ordinal scoring system and is not normally distributed, the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare the distributions of rCALM scores across all groups. Pairwise comparisons were performed by collapsing groups and applying separate Mann–Whitney U tests. To investigate whether rCALM levels, along with individual biomarkers, predict neuronal density we computed Simple regressions (R) to determine the relationship between biomarkers, rCALM and MGV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mean, median, and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. Differences between the mean was determined using Student’s unpaired t test, and for the median, the Mann–Whitney U test was applied. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to test differences in gender distribution and the association between the mtDNA copy number and the disease. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Analyses were performed using Stat View software version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Primary Diseases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using StatView software version 5.0 (SAS, Cary, USA). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the data between the two groups. The chi-square test was used to compare the primary diseases between the two groups. The results are expressed as mean ± SD, and a value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Real-Time RT-qPCR and RNA-seq Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analysis for real time RT-qPCR and RNA-seq are presented as the mean±S.E.M [15 (link)]. Each experiment was performed at least three times and subjected to statistical analysis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was first performed to determine differences among groups (*: p<0.05; **: p<0.01). Fisher’s post hoc test was then performed to determine significant differences between pairs. Values of p<0.05 and p<0.01 were considered significant. Statistical tests were performed using Stat View software version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genetic Association Analysis Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The deviation from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) and dichotomous variables such as gender distribution between cases and controls, allele and genotype frequency distribution between cases and controls were tested using Pearson’s Chi-square analysis and Fisher’s test where applicable. Normality testing of continuous variables was done using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Accordingly, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for a two-group comparison and the Kruskal-Wallis test for a three-group comparison. Logistic regression analysis was performed to test the effects of multiple risk factors (age, sex, and genotypes) on disease outcomes. The analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA), Stat View software version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and SNPStats online software (https://www.snpstats.net/start.htm) [47 (link)]. The combined allelic effect was estimated using SHEsis (http://analysis.bio-x.cn/myAnalysis.php). Power analysis used an open-source online PS program version 3.1.2 for unmatched case-control (dichotomous) testing (https://vbiostatps.app.vumc.org/ps/). A p < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant. Bonferroni’s correction p-value for multiple testing was considered where applicable.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Hepatocyte NTCR Correlation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The values of measured variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median with a range of values. The median NTCRs of the donor and recipient hepatocytes were compared between cases using the Mann-Whitney test or Wilcoxon test. Correlations were analyzed with the Spearman correlation coefficient test and a single regression analysis using the software package Dr.SPSS II (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The relationships among NTCR values, donor age and group (lower versus comparable NTCR) were assessed by multiple regression analyses using StatView software version 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). Differences were considered significant at p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Predictors of Overall Survival in Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous quantitative variables were compared using Student’s t test, ordinal quantitative variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U test, and qualitative variables were compared using chi-squared test with Fisher’s exact test. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC), overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates, and group comparisons were made using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors of OS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Multivariate analyses were performed for variables with probability (p) values of < 0.20 in univariate analysis, and differences were considered significant when p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using StatView software version 5.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!