The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Plant efficiency analyser

Manufactured by Hansatech
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Plant Efficiency Analyser is a lab equipment designed to measure and analyze various parameters related to plant efficiency. It provides objective data on the physiological condition and performance of plants under different environmental conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using plant efficiency analyser

1

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chlorophyll a fluorescence yields were measured using a portable fluorometer Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech Instruments Ltd., Kings Lynn, UK) as described by Ďurkovič et al. [37 (link)]. The parameters such as maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), variable-to-initial fluorescence ratio (Fv/F0), and potential electron acceptor capacity of photosystem II—“area” (i.e., area above the induction curve between F0 and Fm) were determined. Measurements were performed on adaxial surfaces of 4–5 leaves per plant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Photosynthetic Efficiency Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The maximum quantum yield of PS II was measured after 25 days of transplanting as Fv/Fm ratio from dark-adapted leaves (15 min in darkness) using the Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech Instruments, King’s Lynn, UK) according to He et al. [58 (link)]. Measurements of the Fv/Fm ratio were taken at midday from leaves, which were attached to the plants’ stems in the greenhouse. New fully expanded leaves were also harvested at 0900 h on day 28 after transplanting to determine △F/Fm’, ETR and NPQ from dark-adapted leaves (15 min in darkness) using the IMAGING PAM MAXI (Walz, Effeltrich, Effeltrich, Germany) in the laboratory. The images of fluorescence emission under different actinic lights were digitized and transmitted via an ethernet interface (GigEVision®) to a personal computer for storage and analysis. The △F/Fm’, ETR, and NPQ were then calculated as described by He et al. [58 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Photosynthetic Efficiency Using PSI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The capacity of PSI was determined by measuring the absorbance at 820 nm (ΔI/Io) using a Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech, King's Lynn, UK) after the leaves were treated in the dark for 30 min (Schansker et al., 2003 (link); Qin et al., 2011 (link)). The first reliable measurement point for fluorescence change was at 20 μs, whereas the first measurement point for transmission change was at 400 μs. The transmission measurement point was 100 μs. Light intensity was 3,000 μmol m−2 s−1 photon flux density. The far-red source was a QDDH73520 light-emitting diode (LED; Quantum Devices Inc., Barneveld, WI, USA) filtered at 720 ± 5 nm. The modulated (33.3 kHz) far-red measuring light was provided by an OD820 LED (Opto Diode Corp., Newbury Park, CA, USA) filtered at 830 ± 20 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Photochemical Efficiency of PSII

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII was estimated in dark-adapted samples by the Fv/Fm ratio. After 12 days of transplanting, Fv/Fm ratio were measured during mid-photoperiod using the Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech Instruments, UK) according to He et al. [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantum Efficiency and Photosynthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fv/Fm ratios (maximum potential quantum efficiency of PSII) of dark-adapted attached leaves were measured using the Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech Instruments Ltd, England) during mid-photoperiod. The ETR, ΔF/Fm’, qP and NPQ were determined from detached leaf using the IMAGING PAM MAXI (Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) at 25°C in the laboratory. The details of Fv/Fm ratio, ETR, ΔF/Fm′, qP and NPQ measurements were described by He et al. (2011) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fv/Fm ratio were measured from the dark-adapted leaves (15 min in the darkness) during midday (1200 to 1300 h) using the Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech Instruments Ltd., King’s Lynn, England). The initial fluorescence, Fo, was recorded before assessing the maximum fluorescence, Fm, by 0.8 s of saturated pulse (>6000 μmquol∙m2 s1). Variable fluorescence, Fv, was calculated as Fv = Fm − Fo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measuring Photochemical Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The maximum photochemical efficiency of PS II was estimated in dark-adapted samples by the Fv/Fm ratio. Predawn and midday Fv/Fm ratios were measured from the attached youngest fully expanded leaves in the greenhouse before photoperiod and during mid-photoperiod on sunny days after transplanting for 34 days using the Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech Instruments, UK) according to He et al. (2001).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measuring Photochemical Efficiency in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The maximal efficiency of PS II photochemistry was measured by the fluorescence Fv/Fm ratio from the dark-adapted leaves (15 min in darkness) using a Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech Instruments Ltd., England) during the mid-photoperiod [48 (link)]. The initial fluorescence, Fo, was first recorded. Fm, maximum fluorescence, was assessed by 0.8 s of saturated pulse (>6000 μmquol∙m−2 s−1, which completely reduces all primary acceptors for PS II). Variable fluorescence, Fv, was calculated as Fv = Fm − Fo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Simultaneous gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured in leaves of control and 24 h stress treated WT and transgenic tobacco using LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system (LICOR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Plants were dark-adapted for 45 min and fluorescence parameters were recorded. Steady state fluorescence yield was achieved by exposing plants to ambient light (1,200 μmol m−2s−1) for 60 min in a plant growth chamber (PGC-105, Percival Scientific, US). The gas exchange measurement conditions were 1,200 μmol m−2 s−1 PPFD, ambient atmospheric CO2 (380 μmol−1 mol−1) and RH (60–65%) and 26°C block temperature. The net photosynthetic rate (PN; μmol m−2s−1), stomatal conductance (gs; mmol H2O m−2s−1), intercellular CO2 (Ci) concentration (μmol m−2s−1), transpiration rate (E; mmol m−2s−1), PSII operating efficiency (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), photochemical quenching (qP), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) were determined.
Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient (Strasser and Strasser, 1995 ) in leaves was measured on dark adapted stressed and unstressed plant using plant efficiency analyser (Hansatech Instruments Ltd., England). Chlorophyll fluorescence was recorded thrice (sub-replicate) at different regions of 03rd leaf of 03 plants (biological replicate) from each treatment (n = 9).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Chlorophyll Fluorescence Analysis of PSII

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chl fluorescence induction (FI) measurements were carried out at room temperature using Plant Efficiency Analyser (Hansatech, Kings Lynn, Norfolk, UK). The assay medium contained 20 mM MES-NaOH (pH 6.2), 15 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 400 mM sucrose, PSII submembrane fractions at 25 μg Chl.ml-1 and the specified concentrations of Al3+. Samples were adapted for 1 min in the dark and then excited with saturating red actinic light (peaking at 655 nm and intensity of 3000 μmol photons m-2 s-1) provided by light emitting diodes. As the fluorescence signal during the first 40 μs is ascribed to artifacts due to delay in response time of the instrument, these data were not included in the analysis of FI traces. The signal at 40 μs is taken as F0, the initial fluorescence intensity. Variable fluorescence, Fv (the difference between F0 and the maximal fluorescence, Fm in dark adapted samples) was used to calculate the Fv/Fm and Fv/F0 ratios.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!